Have you ever felt like your mind holds images you can’t quite “see”?

One of the most common experiences shared in our community is the challenge of explaining to others how people with aphantasia (who can’t consciously visualize) can “know” what something looks like without being able to “see” it in our minds. Many can instantly recognize our car in a parking lot, navigate our home in the dark, or describe a loved one’s face in detail – all without being able to conjure up a mental image. This raises an intriguing question: how are we storing and accessing this visual information?

New research published in Current Biology might offer some fascinating insights. Scientists studied brain activity in people with and without aphantasia while they looked at simple patterns and then tried to imagine them. They found that when aphantasics attempted to imagine these patterns, their visual brain areas actually became active – similar to people who can visualize. However, there was a key difference: the patterns of brain activity during actual seeing versus imagining were distinctly different in aphantasics, unlike in people who can visualize.

This suggests that the aphantasic brains might be processing visual information in a unique way – one that doesn’t result in conscious mental images but still allows for the storage and access of visual memories. Rather than having a “broken” visualization system, we might have a different way of processing visual information that bypasses conscious imagery but still maintains the essential information.

What do you think about this? Does it align with your experience of knowing without seeing? How do you think your brain stores visual information without creating mental images?

Share this post

You must be signed in to comment
Total Comments (6)

I definitely have the feeling that an image is there that I can’t see and yet I can still describe it. I have a good sense of direction and I give directions the way I’d think a visualizer would. I tend to say turn right at the big white church vs head north on Main St.

Yeah. I know what my friends look like. I have some sort of recognition of them… a very distinct recognition. For example, I’m very good at recognizing relatively unknown actors. I’ll say, “That guy was in an episode of [blank].” And I’m almost always right. But… I don’t seem to have any ability to visualize. Nothing. And yet I feel that I sort of do… but not as an image. I can evoke a feeling of recognition by thinking about someone, but I don’t see anything in my mind. It’s so weird.

I think there is definitely a connection between aphantasia and intuition for some people.

Completely agree that we can describe things in the way a visualiser can, and I can give directions with great detail, spell out long words, remember places and events as if I can see them when recounting to another, but does my brain need an image somewhere to do this any more than a computer needs an image? I don’t know – sometimes it does feel as if an image might be lurking somewhere, but darned if I can see it!

I relate to this. I feel like I can recall people/objects/events without seeing them in my mind. I can describe them verbally, draw a fairly detailed picture from memory, or recognize a real photo versus an altered one from the event in question.

As a person with aphantasia, I have the ability to recognize which car belongs to a person I know, and I’m right like 90% of the time

I am very new to the whole thing and found out couple weeks. (I am almost 36) I asked AI a lot and found out a lot. Music without a voice, like the song Max Richter – On the nature of Daylight. I tried to do an exercise with my mom, who does see pictures. We listen to the song and tried to explained the story that you hear… My mom saw pictures. I felt emotional, needed to guess a couple words out loud, until I said a certain word and felt the emotion. Then I tried explaining more and every time I got emotional I knew that was the word/sentence in the story.
And indeed still amazed to read that the “Just Knowing” is common among us.