ResearchRoyal Society Open Science
Real-world implications of aphantasia: episodic recall of eyewitnesses with aphantasia is less complete but no less accurate than typical imagers
Dando and colleaguesSeptember 2023
Abstract
Individuals with aphantasia report an inability to voluntarily visually image and reduced episodic memory, yet episodic accounts provided by witnesses and victims are fundamental for criminal justice. Using the mock-witness paradigm, we investigated eyewitness memory of individuals with aphantasia versus typical imagers. Participants viewed a mock crime and 48 hours later were interviewed about the event, randomly allocated to one of three conditions. Two interview conditions included techniques designed to support episodic retrieval mode, namely (i) Mental Reinstatement of Context (MRC) and (ii) Sketch Reinstatement of Context (Sketch-RC). A third Control condition did not include retrieval support. Aphantasic mock-eyewitnesses recalled 30% less correct information and accounts were less complete, but they made no more errors and were as accurate as typical imagers. Interaction effects revealed reduced correct recall and less complete accounts for aphantasic participants in MRC interviews versus Sketch-RC and Control. Aphantaisic participants in the Control outperformed those in both the Sketch-RC and MRC, although Sketch-RC improved completeness by 15% versus MRC. Our pattern of results indicates reduced mental imagery ability might be compensated for by alternative self-initiated cognitive strategies. Findings offer novel insights into episodic recall performance in information gathering interviews when ability to voluntarily visualize is impoverished.
Our summary in plain words
What This Study Is About
How They Studied It
- 120 adults took part: 60 with aphantasia (a score of 32 or below on the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire) and 60 typical imagers.
- Each watched a one-minute video of a mock crime: two people walk into a shop and run out about 20 seconds later, chased by a shouting man.
- 48 hours later they were interviewed by video call with one of three randomly assigned methods: mental reinstatement (eyes closed, picturing the scene and how they felt), sketch reinstatement (drawing whatever reminded them of the event), or no memory aid.
- Each interview began with a free account of everything they remembered, followed by questions. Answers were scored against 71 details of the video as correct, wrong, or made up.
What They Found
What This Might Mean
One Interesting Detail
This summary was written with AI and may contain errors. Check the original paper.
Authors
Coral J. Dando
Department of Psychology, School of Social Science, University of Westminster, London W1B 2HW, UK
1 paper in the libraryZacharia Nahouli
School of Psychology, University of Derby, Derby, UK
1 paper in the libraryAlison Hart
Department of Psychology, School of Social Science, University of Westminster, London W1B 2HW, UK
1 paper in the libraryZoë Pounder
7 papers in the library
Cite this paper
Dando, C. J., Nahouli, Z., Hart, A., & Pounder, Z. (2023). Real-world implications of aphantasia: episodic recall of eyewitnesses with aphantasia is less complete but no less accurate than typical imagers. Royal Society Open Science, 10(10). doi:10.1098/rsos.231007
Topics
Most-cited researchers
Recruit participants for your study
We can help you reach people across the imagery spectrum, from aphantasia to hyperphantasia.
Partner with usImage-Free Insights
A short note from our founder, Tom Ebeyer, every other week, plus occasional news and invitations to take part in studies. Change what you get from any email.