Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Attention driven phantom vision: measuring the sensory strength of attentional templates and their relation to visual mental imagery and aphantasia

Keogh, R., & Pearson, J. (2021). Attention driven phantom vision: measuring the sensory strength of attentional templates and their relation to visual mental imagery and aphantasia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 376(1817), 20190688. doi:10.1098/rstb.2019.0688

Abstract

When we search for an object in an array or anticipate attending to a future object, we create an ‘attentional template' of the object. The definitions of attentional templates and visual imagery share many similarities as well as many of the same neural characteristics. However, the phenomenology of these attentional templates and their neural similarities to visual imagery and perception are rarely, if ever discussed. Here, we investigate the relationship between these two forms of non-retinal phantom vision through the use of the binocular rivalry technique, which allows us to measure the sensory strength of attentional templates in the absence of concurrent perceptual stimuli. We find that attentional templates correlate with both feature-based attention and visual imagery. Attentional templates, like imagery, were significantly disrupted by the presence of irrelevant visual stimuli, while feature-based attention was not. We also found that a special population who lack the ability to visualize (aphantasia), showed evidence of feature-based attention when measured using the binocular rivalry paradigm, but not attentional templates. Taken together, these data suggest functional similarities between attentional templates and visual imagery, advancing the theory of visual imagery as a general simulation tool used across cognition. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Offline perception: voluntary and spontaneous perceptual experiences without matching external stimulation’.

Authors

  • Rebecca Keogh17
  • Joel Pearson33

What This Study Is About

Researchers wanted to know if the "mental blueprints" we use to find objects—like the "search image" in your head when looking for a lost shoe—are actually the same thing as mental images. They also wanted to see if people with aphantasia can still create these blueprints.

How They Studied It

The team used a trick called binocular rivalry. Imagine wearing glasses where the left lens shows red stripes and the right shows green. Your brain can’t merge them, so it flips back and forth between seeing red and green.
The researchers tested dozens of people, including a group with aphantasia (the inability to voluntarily picture things in the mind). Participants were asked to either imagine a pattern or simply "prepare to find" a pattern (called an attentional template) before the red/green test. If their "mental blueprint" was strong, it would force the brain to see that color first.

What They Found

For most people, imagining a pattern and "preparing" to see one worked almost exactly the same way—both acted like "phantom vision" that biased what they saw next.
However, the results for the aphantasic group were different:
  • They could pay attention to things they were actually looking at just fine.
  • But, they could not create a "mental blueprint" when looking at a blank screen.
  • While typical visualizers were about 60-70% likely to see the color they were "preparing" for, people with aphantasia stayed at 50% (random chance).

What This Might Mean

This suggests that mental imagery (picturing things) and attentional templates (preparing to see things) are like two different apps using the same "graphics card" in the brain. Because people with aphantasia don't have the "imagery app," they might use non-visual strategies to find things in the world.
*Note:* This was a small study (only 10-15 people with aphantasia), so while the results are exciting, we need more data to be 100% sure this applies to everyone.

One Interesting Detail

The researchers found that simply turning up the background lights "washed out" these mental blueprints, proving that these "phantom images" actually live in the same low-level parts of the brain that process real sunlight!
This summary was generated by AI and may contain errors. Always refer to the original paper for accuracy.