Connection Between Aphantasia and SDAM: Expert Insights from Dr. Brian Levine

One of the most striking findings from Dr. Levine's research is the significant overlap between aphantasia and SDAM. This connection makes intuitive sense, as normal autobiographical memory is heavily visual for most people.

In a comprehensive live Q&A session, renowned memory researcher Dr. Brian Levine from the Rotman Research Institute at Baycrest Health Sciences shared expert insights into the relationship between aphantasia and SDAM (Severely Deficient Autobiographical Memory). This discussion revealed fascinating connections between these two conditions and their impact on human memory and cognition.

Understanding SDAM and Its Discovery

Dr. Levine, a clinical psychologist specializing in neuropsychology, discovered SDAM through his work with patients experiencing unexpected memory syndromes. The breakthrough came when Susie McKinnon, now considered the index case of SDAM, contacted his lab describing her complete lack of autobiographical memory despite never having a brain injury.

SDAM is characterized by:

  • Inability to re-experience past events
  • Lack of visual imagery when recalling personal memories
  • Intact factual knowledge about one’s life
  • Normal day-to-day functioning despite memory differences

The Aphantasia and SDAM Connection

One of the most striking findings from Dr. Levine’s research is the significant overlap between aphantasia and SDAM. This connection makes intuitive sense, as normal autobiographical memory is heavily visual for most people.

Key Overlaps:

  • Visual imagery deficit: Both conditions involve challenges with mental imagery
  • Memory re-experiencing: People with either condition often cannot “relive” past events
  • High co-occurrence: Most people with aphantasia report poor autobiographical memory, and vice versa

However, Dr. Levine’s unpublished research has identified some individuals who have one condition but not the other, suggesting these may be related but distinct phenomena.

How Memories Work Without Imagery

For people with SDAM or aphantasia, memory functions differently but effectively. Dr. Levine explained that these individuals become exceptionally skilled at using “data points” and “scaffolds” – factual information, inferences, and contextual knowledge that substitute for visual re-experiencing.

Memory Without Images:

  • Factual knowledge: “I just know” rather than “I can see”
  • Enhanced reasoning: Stronger abstract and inferential thinking
  • Strategic compensation: Better use of non-visual memory cues

Surprising Advantages and Career Patterns

Contrary to viewing these as purely deficits, Dr. Levine’s research reveals unexpected advantages:

Professional Advantages:

  • STEM careers: Higher representation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics
  • Strategic thinking: Excellence in business and analytical roles
  • Problem-solving: Enhanced abstract reasoning abilities
  • Theoretical work: Notable examples like physicist Nick Watkins

Cognitive Benefits:

  • Reduced trauma impact: Lower susceptibility to PTSD flashbacks
  • Objective thinking: Less emotional baggage from past events
  • Forward-focused: Better at moving beyond negative experiences

Memory Formation vs. Retrieval

A critical question addressed was whether memories are formed differently or simply retrieved differently in SDAM. Dr. Levine’s research suggests:

  • Weaker initial encoding: Memories may be less robust from the start
  • Faster decay: Without visual reinforcement, memories fade more quickly
  • Time-dependent deficits: Differences become more pronounced with older memories
  • Alternative mechanisms: Compensation through non-visual memory systems

The Role of Attention and Arousal

Dr. Levine identified four key factors for memory strength:

  1. Emotion
  2. Significance
  3. Arousal (attention-capturing events)
  4. Novelty

For people with aphantasia or SDAM, directing conscious attention becomes even more critical since they can’t rely on automatic visual encoding.

Prevalence and Recognition

Based on statistical analysis, both aphantasia and SDAM likely affect approximately 2% of the population – defined as individuals performing below the 98th percentile on relevant measures. However, many people remain unaware they have these conditions until learning about them through media or research.

Current Status:

  • Not officially recognized: Neither condition has formal diagnostic criteria
  • Research ongoing: Brain imaging studies showing promising neural differences
  • Growing awareness: More people self-identifying after learning about these conditions

Treatment and Management Approaches

Dr. Levine emphasized that these aren’t necessarily conditions requiring “treatment” but rather individual differences that can be managed:

Effective Strategies:

  • Intentional documentation: Writing down important events and details
  • Photo reinforcement: Using visual aids to strengthen memory traces
  • Repetitive rehearsal: Deliberately reviewing important information
  • Social reconstruction: Discussing events with others who were present

Brain Differences and Future Research

While no definitive brain markers exist yet, Dr. Levine’s lab has identified:

  • Functional differences: Altered brain activation patterns during memory tasks
  • Structural variations: Subtle anatomical differences under investigation
  • Network connectivity: Different patterns of neural communication

Implications for Understanding Memory

This research challenges traditional assumptions about memory and reveals that:

  • Multiple memory systems: Visual re-experiencing isn’t necessary for functional memory
  • Compensatory mechanisms: The brain can adapt remarkably to work around deficits
  • Individual differences: Normal cognitive variation is broader than previously understood

Looking Forward: The Future of Memory Research

The relationship between aphantasia and SDAM represents a fascinating frontier in memory research. Dr. Levine’s work demonstrates that these conditions, while creating challenges in some areas, often come with unexpected cognitive advantages. Understanding these differences not only helps affected individuals but also provides crucial insights into how human memory and consciousness function.

For those who suspect they might have SDAM, take the Survey of Autobiographical Memory (SAM). The growing recognition of these conditions promises better support strategies and deeper understanding of the remarkable diversity of human cognition.

To learn more about Dr. Levine’s research, visit the Rotman Research Institute’s website. If you’re experiencing memory concerns, consider consulting with a neuropsychologist familiar with these emerging conditions. If you’re experiencing memory concerns, consider consulting with a neuropsychologist familiar with these emerging conditions and/or speak with an aphantasia specialist who can provide targeted support for mental healthcare needs.

Palombo, D. J., Alain, C., Söderlund, H., Khuu, W., & Levine, B. (2015). Severely deficient autobiographical memory (SDAM) in healthy adults: A new mnemonic syndrome. Neuropsychologia, 72, 105–118. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.04.012
Palombo, D. J., Williams, L. J., Abdi, H., & Levine, B. (2013). The survey of autobiographical memory (SAM): a novel measure of trait mnemonics in everyday life. Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 49(6), 1526–1540. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2012.08.023