Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Ask AI About This Paper
Ask AI About This Paper

The perceptual and phenomenal capacity of mental imagery

DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.02.004
Tags:
Measurement & Assessment
Keogh, R., & Pearson, J. (2017). The perceptual and phenomenal capacity of mental imagery. Cognition, 162, 124–132. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.02.004

Abstract

Despite the brain’s immense processing power, it has finite resources. Where do these resource limits come from? Little research has examined possible low-level sensory contributions to these limitations. Mental imagery is a fundamental part of human cognition that bridges cognition with sensory representations. Hence, imagery serves as a good candidate sensory process for probing how low capacity limitations might extend down the processing hierarchy. Here we introduce a novel technique to measure the sensory capacity of mental imagery, while removing the need for memory and any direct subjective reports. Contrary to our dynamic phenomenological experience, we demonstrate that visual imagery is severely limited by the perceptual and phenomenal bottleneck of visual representation. These capacity limits appear to be independent of generation time, depend on visual feature heterogeneity, are attenuated by concurrent retinal stimulation and are endowed with good metacognition. Additionally, the precision of visual representation declines rapidly with the number of stimuli, which is governed by a simple power law. We anticipate that this assay will be important for mapping the limits of human information processing.

Authors

  • Rebecca Keogh17
  • Joel Pearson35

The perceptual and phenomenal capacity of mental imagery

DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.02.004
Tags:
Measurement & Assessment
Keogh, R., & Pearson, J. (2017). The perceptual and phenomenal capacity of mental imagery. Cognition, 162, 124–132. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.02.004

Abstract

Despite the brain’s immense processing power, it has finite resources. Where do these resource limits come from? Little research has examined possible low-level sensory contributions to these limitations. Mental imagery is a fundamental part of human cognition that bridges cognition with sensory representations. Hence, imagery serves as a good candidate sensory process for probing how low capacity limitations might extend down the processing hierarchy. Here we introduce a novel technique to measure the sensory capacity of mental imagery, while removing the need for memory and any direct subjective reports. Contrary to our dynamic phenomenological experience, we demonstrate that visual imagery is severely limited by the perceptual and phenomenal bottleneck of visual representation. These capacity limits appear to be independent of generation time, depend on visual feature heterogeneity, are attenuated by concurrent retinal stimulation and are endowed with good metacognition. Additionally, the precision of visual representation declines rapidly with the number of stimuli, which is governed by a simple power law. We anticipate that this assay will be important for mapping the limits of human information processing.

Authors

  • Rebecca Keogh17
  • Joel Pearson35

What This Study Is About

This study explores the "bandwidth" of the mind’s eye. Researchers wanted to know how many different things a person can picture at once and whether the quality of those mental images drops as the number of items increases.

How They Studied It

Researchers used a specialized test called "binocular rivalry" to measure the strength of mental imagery (the ability to visualize things in the mind). In this test, participants were asked to imagine one to four different patterns (striped circles called Gabor patches) for six seconds.
After imagining the patterns, participants were shown two different images—one to each eye—simultaneously. Usually, the brain "picks" the image that matches what the person was just imagining. By measuring how often this happened, the researchers could calculate the strength and precision of the participants' mental images without relying solely on what the participants said they saw.

What They Found

The study discovered that mental imagery has very strict capacity limits. As participants tried to imagine more items:
  • Strength decreased: The "priming" effect (the brain's preference for the imagined image) dropped significantly as the number of items increased.
  • Vividness faded: Participants reported that their mental pictures felt less clear.
  • Precision plummeted: The "sharpness" or detail of the mental images declined rapidly. Moving from imagining one item to two items caused the biggest drop in quality.

What This Might Mean

The results suggest that the brain has a limited "pool" of energy or space for mental imagery. Instead of having a set number of "slots" for images, the brain seems to spread a single resource thin. The more things you try to picture, the fuzzier and weaker each individual image becomes. This suggests that aphantasia (the inability to visualize) or low imagery might be related to how the brain manages these limited sensory resources in the visual cortex.

One Interesting Detail

The researchers found that the drop-off in image quality follows a predictable mathematical pattern known as a "power law." This means that the brain's ability to visualize isn't just random; it follows a strict physical rule, much like how the intensity of light or sound fades over a distance.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain errors. Always refer to the original paper for accuracy.
Aphantasia Logo
Most-Cited Researchers
Top 10 researchers by number of papers published in Aphantasia
1

Joel Pearson

35
2

Merlin Monzel

30
3

Adam Zeman

20
4

Rebecca Keogh

17
5

Martin Reuter

16
6

Juha Silvanto

14
7

Paolo Bartolomeo

11
8

Carla Dance

10
9

Jianghao Liu

9
10

Fraser Milton

9
Recruit the largest aphantasia cohort on earth

97.7K+ users & subscribers across the imagery spectrum, plus 1.5M+ survey responses in our dataset. Skip the recruitment bottleneck and run your study with the community we've built for a decade.

Partner with us