The varieties of inner speech questionnaire – Revised (VISQ-R): Replicating and refining links between inner speech and psychopathology
Abstract
Inner speech is a common experience for many but hard to measure empirically. The Varieties of Inner Speech Questionnaire (VISQ) has been used to link everyday phenomenology of inner speech - such as inner dialogue - to various psychopathological traits. However, positive and supportive aspects of inner speech have not always been captured. This study presents a revised version of the scale - the VISQ-R - based on factor analyses in two large samples: respondents to a survey on inner speech and reading (N = 1412) and a sample of university students (N = 377). Exploratory factor analysis indicated a five-factor structure including three previous subscales (dialogic, condensed, and other people in inner speech), an evaluative/critical factor, and a new positive/regulatory factor. Confirmatory factor analysis then replicated this structure in sample 2. Hierarchical regression analyses also replicated a number of relations between inner speech, hallucination-proneness, anxiety, depression, self-esteem, and dissociation.
Authors
- Ben Alderson-Day1
- Kaja Mitrenga1
- Sam Wilkinson1
- Simon McCarthy-Jones1
- Charles Fernyhough1
Understanding Inner Speech: A New Perspective
Overview/Introduction
Methodology
- Sample 1: 1,412 individuals who responded to a survey about inner speech and reading.
- Sample 2: 377 university students.
Key Findings
- Dialogic: Conversations with oneself.
- Condensed: Brief and to-the-point thoughts.
- Other People: Imagining conversations with others.
- Evaluative/Critical: Self-criticism or judgment.
- Positive/Regulatory: Encouraging and supportive self-talk.
- Evaluative and dialogic inner speech were linked to higher levels of anxiety, depression, and lower self-esteem.
- Positive inner speech was less common but important for emotional regulation.
- People prone to hallucinations often reported more evaluative and dialogic inner speech.
Implications
Limitations
- The sample was primarily university students, which may not represent the general population.
- The study relied on self-reported data, which can be subjective.