Research Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Olfactory perception and olfactory imagery: A multidimensional analysis.

Carrasco and RidoutNovember 1993

Abstract
What This Study Is About
How They Studied It
What They Found
What This Might Mean
One Interesting Detail
Authors
Cite this paper

Abstract

Whether a system of imagery for olfaction exists is currently an unsettled issue. Moreover, the dimensions underlying odor perception have eluded researchers for many years. Two experiments bearing on these issues are presented. In one experiment, a group of 32 undergraduates rated the similarity of pairs of 16 commonplace odorants (e.g., chocolate and leather) they perceived using scratch and sniff stimuli; in another, a different group of 44 undergraduates was asked to imagine and then rate the similarity of the same pairs of odors. Multidimensional scaling of the data suggests that three-dimensional solutions with similar stimulus dimensions, such as fruitiness, strength, and familiarity, underlied the ratings of both perceived and imagined odors. By finding that similar dimensions define the psychological space of both the imagery and the perception tasks, this study suggests that imagery does indeed exist for olfaction.

Our summary in plain words

What This Study Is About

Researchers wanted to know if humans truly possess "olfactory imagery"—the ability to imagine smells in the mind's eye (or nose)—and whether these mental smells share the same characteristics as real ones. They also looked for the specific "dimensions" we use to categorize smells, such as how fruity or strong they are.

How They Studied It

The study involved two main experiments with university students. In the first group, 32 participants smelled 16 real scents (like chocolate, leather, and gasoline) and rated how similar they were to one another. In the second group, 44 different participants were asked to simply imagine those same 16 smells and rate their similarities. The researchers then used a statistical technique called "multidimensional scaling" to map out how these scents were organized in the participants' minds, comparing the map of real smells to the map of imagined ones.

What They Found

The study found that the "mental maps" for real smells and imagined smells were remarkably similar. Both groups organized smells based on three main factors: how fruity they were, how strong they were, and how familiar they were. Because the structure of the imagined smells so closely matched the structure of the real ones, the researchers concluded that olfactory imagery is a real phenomenon that functions much like actual perception.

What This Might Mean

This suggests that when we imagine a smell, our brains use the same underlying "filing system" as when we actually sniff something. It supports the idea that imagery isn't just a vague memory but a structured sensory experience. However, the study also noted that people are generally poor at naming smells, even when they can imagine or perceive them clearly, suggesting that our "smell vocabulary" is much weaker than our "smell imagery."

One Interesting Detail

The researchers found a nearly perfect correlation between how "pleasant" a real smell was and how "irritating" an imagined smell was. This suggests that when we think a smell is "pleasant," we might actually just be noticing that it doesn't sting or irritate our nose.

This summary was written with AI and may contain errors. Check the original paper.

Authors

Marisa Carrasco
1 paper in the library
Joseph B. Ridout
1 paper in the library

Cite this paper

Carrasco, M., & Ridout, J. B. (n.d.). Olfactory perception and olfactory imagery: a multidimensional analysis.. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19(2), 287–301. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.19.2.287

Topics

Measurement & Assessment

Most-cited researchers

Recruit participants for your study

We can help you reach people across the imagery spectrum, from aphantasia to hyperphantasia.

Partner with us

Image-Free Insights

A short note from our founder, Tom Ebeyer, every other week, plus occasional news and invitations to take part in studies. Change what you get from any email.

Research Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Olfactory perception and olfactory imagery: A multidimensional analysis.

Carrasco and RidoutNovember 1993

Read the paper

Abstract
What This Study Is About
How They Studied It
What They Found
What This Might Mean
One Interesting Detail
Authors
Cite this paper

Abstract

Our summary in plain words

What This Study Is About

How They Studied It

What They Found

What This Might Mean

One Interesting Detail

This summary was written with AI and may contain errors. Check the original paper.

Authors

Marisa Carrasco
1 paper in the library
Joseph B. Ridout
1 paper in the library

Cite this paper

Topics

Measurement & Assessment

Most-cited researchers

Recruit participants for your study

We can help you reach people across the imagery spectrum, from aphantasia to hyperphantasia.

Partner with us

More research

All research

2026

Imaginary Presence—Merleau-Ponty and Mental Imagery

Deery · Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences

This philosophy paper asks how Merleau-Ponty's ideas would explain the perception-like feel of mental images. It argues that neither the view of images as perceptual representations nor the view of them as simulations explains that feel, and proposes instead that imagining something means partly taking up the bodily stance one would have if it were really there, bringing a vague sense of how it could look. In a footnote, the author suggests that people with aphantasia keep this capacity for perception but cannot use it on purpose to make absent things appear, while calling aphantasia beyond the paper's scope.

2026

Imagery in affective and neurodevelopmental conditions: an insula-based interoceptive framework

Kvamme, Nagai and Silvanto · Trends Open

In this opinion article, the authors propose that the brain's processing of body signals, centered on the anterior insula, is a shared source of both mental imagery and emotion. On this view, conditions such as depression, anxiety, PTSD, autism and ADHD change imagery because they disturb this same system, and body-focused treatments might help restore imagery. The authors say the causal direction has not yet been shown and call for long-term and treatment studies to test it.

2026

Seeing without eyes: Relation between visual mental imagery and visual hallucinations

Panigutti and colleagues · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

This systematic review found only 11 studies on imagery and hallucinations in Parkinson's, Alzheimer's and schizophrenia, and none in Lewy body dementia. Seven reported a link and four did not, so the evidence is indecisive.

Image-Free Insights

A short note from our founder, Tom Ebeyer, every other week, plus occasional news and invitations to take part in studies. Change what you get from any email.