ResearchBritish Journal of Psychology
Assessing vividness of mental imagery: The Plymouth Sensory Imagery Questionnaire
Andrade and colleaguesOctober 2014
Abstract
Mental imagery may occur in any sensory modality, although visual imagery has been most studied. A sensitive measure of the vividness of imagery across a range of modalities is needed: the shorter version of Bett’s Questionnaire upon Mental Imagery (Sheehan, 1967, J. Clin. Psychology, 23, 386) uses outdated items and has an unreliable factor structure. We report the development and initial validation of the Plymouth Sensory Imagery Questionnaire (Psi-Q) comprising items for each of the following modalities: Vision, Sound, Smell, Taste, Touch, Bodily Sensation, and Emotional Feeling. An exploratory factor analysis on a 35-item form indicated that these modalities formed separate factors, rather than a single imagery factor, and this was replicated by confirmatory factor analysis. The Psi-Q was validated against the Spontaneous Use of Imagery Scale (Reisberg et al., 2003, Appl. Cogn. Psychology, 17, 147) and Marks’ (1995, J. Mental Imagery, 19, 153) Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire-2 (VVIQ-2). A short 21-item form comprising the best three items from the seven factors correlated with the total score and subscales of the full form, and with the VVIQ-2. Inspection of the data shows that while visual and sound imagery is most often rated as vivid, individuals who rate one modality as strong and the other as weak are not uncommon. Findings are interpreted within a working memory framework and point to the need for further research to identify the specific cognitive processes underlying the vividness of imagery across sensory modalities.
Our summary in plain words
What This Study Is About
How They Studied It
- 35 items, five for each of seven senses, such as a sunset, the smell of newly cut grass or the bodily sensation of relaxing in a warm bath, each rated from 0 (no image at all) to 10 (as vivid as real life).
- Online samples, mostly university students and staff.
- Study 1: 404 of 419 people analyzed, plus a scale of everyday visual imagery use; 41 retook both 22 months later.
- Study 2: a further 223 people, to confirm the structure and test a 21-item short form.
- Study 3: 212 people also completed the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire-2 (VVIQ-2).
What They Found
What This Might Mean
One Interesting Detail
This summary was written with AI and may contain errors. Check the original paper.
Authors
Jackie Andrade
School of Psychology Cognition Institute Plymouth University UK
1 paper in the libraryJon May
School of Psychology Cognition Institute Plymouth University UK
2 papers in the libraryCatherine Deeprose
School of Psychology Cognition Institute Plymouth University UK
1 paper in the librarySarah‐Jane Baugh
School of Psychology Cognition Institute Plymouth University UK
1 paper in the libraryGiorgio Ganis
School of Psychology Cognition Institute Plymouth University UK
2 papers in the library
Cite this paper
Andrade, J., May, J., Deeprose, C., Baugh, S., & Ganis, G. (2014). Assessing vividness of mental imagery: the plymouth sensory imagery questionnaire. British Journal of Psychology, 105(4), 547–563. doi:10.1111/bjop.12050
Topics
Most-cited researchers
Recruit participants for your study
We can help you reach people across the imagery spectrum, from aphantasia to hyperphantasia.
Partner with usImage-Free Insights
A short note from our founder, Tom Ebeyer, every other week, plus occasional news and invitations to take part in studies. Change what you get from any email.