Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Ask AI About This Paper
Ask AI About This Paper

The Impact of Aphantasia on Mental Healthcare Experiences

DOI: 10.1525/collabra.127416
Tags:
Mental Health
Mawtus, B., Renwick, F., Thomas, B. R., & Reeder, R. R. (2024). The impact of aphantasia on mental healthcare experiences. Collabra: Psychology, 10(1). doi:10.1525/collabra.127416

Abstract

Approximately 4% of the population has aphantasia, which is defined as impoverished, or absent, sensory mental imagery. Previous research suggests that people with aphantasia (aphants) may have a higher prevalence of mental health conditions and neurodivergence compared to the general population, but aphantasia presents a special challenge for diagnosis and treatment. Many mental health conditions are currently characterized by imagery-related symptomology (such as sensory flashbacks in post-traumatic stress disorder or negative body image in eating disorders), and the dominant therapeutic treatments rely heavily on imagery techniques. Thus far, little is known about how this impacts mental healthcare experiences in individuals with aphantasia. In the current study, we used a mixed-methods (questionnaire, interview) approach to comprehensively investigate the effects of aphantasia on seeking diagnoses and treatments for mental illness. Quantitative analyses on the questionnaire data revealed that virtually all psychiatric disorders manifest with a lack of imagery-related symptomology in aphantasia compared to typical imagery controls; aphants report “lack of awareness or understanding of aphantasia” as a common factor in missed- or misdiagnosis by mental health professionals, although the prevalence of missed and misdiagnoses are no different from typical imagery controls; and aphants are very likely to report that therapies involving mental imagery, especially visual imagery in CBT, are ineffective in their mental health treatment compared to controls. Two main themes were generated following qualitative analysis of interviews: Quest for Identity and Mental Health Journey. Feelings of being different, memory challenges, and self-discovery based on help-seeking contributed to the first theme. Aphants found different levels of success in their mental health journeys depending on whether they experienced anxiety and/or depression, neurodiversity conditions, or trauma and/or complex mental health conditions, with the latter group critically relying on professional empathy and understanding for positive outcomes. Together, these results point to a widespread impact of aphantasia on diverse aspects of mental healthcare.

Authors

  • Bridget Mawtus1
  • Fran Renwick1
  • Bethany R Thomas1
  • Reshanne R. Reeder7

The Impact of Aphantasia on Mental Healthcare Experiences

DOI: 10.1525/collabra.127416
Tags:
Mental Health
Mawtus, B., Renwick, F., Thomas, B. R., & Reeder, R. R. (2024). The impact of aphantasia on mental healthcare experiences. Collabra: Psychology, 10(1). doi:10.1525/collabra.127416

Abstract

Approximately 4% of the population has aphantasia, which is defined as impoverished, or absent, sensory mental imagery. Previous research suggests that people with aphantasia (aphants) may have a higher prevalence of mental health conditions and neurodivergence compared to the general population, but aphantasia presents a special challenge for diagnosis and treatment. Many mental health conditions are currently characterized by imagery-related symptomology (such as sensory flashbacks in post-traumatic stress disorder or negative body image in eating disorders), and the dominant therapeutic treatments rely heavily on imagery techniques. Thus far, little is known about how this impacts mental healthcare experiences in individuals with aphantasia. In the current study, we used a mixed-methods (questionnaire, interview) approach to comprehensively investigate the effects of aphantasia on seeking diagnoses and treatments for mental illness. Quantitative analyses on the questionnaire data revealed that virtually all psychiatric disorders manifest with a lack of imagery-related symptomology in aphantasia compared to typical imagery controls; aphants report “lack of awareness or understanding of aphantasia” as a common factor in missed- or misdiagnosis by mental health professionals, although the prevalence of missed and misdiagnoses are no different from typical imagery controls; and aphants are very likely to report that therapies involving mental imagery, especially visual imagery in CBT, are ineffective in their mental health treatment compared to controls. Two main themes were generated following qualitative analysis of interviews: Quest for Identity and Mental Health Journey. Feelings of being different, memory challenges, and self-discovery based on help-seeking contributed to the first theme. Aphants found different levels of success in their mental health journeys depending on whether they experienced anxiety and/or depression, neurodiversity conditions, or trauma and/or complex mental health conditions, with the latter group critically relying on professional empathy and understanding for positive outcomes. Together, these results point to a widespread impact of aphantasia on diverse aspects of mental healthcare.

Authors

  • Bridget Mawtus1
  • Fran Renwick1
  • Bethany R Thomas1
  • Reshanne R. Reeder7

What This Study Is About

This research explores how having aphantasia—the inability to create mental images in the "mind's eye"—affects a person's experience with mental healthcare. Researchers wanted to know if a lack of mental imagery makes it harder to get an accurate diagnosis or if it makes common treatments like Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) less effective.

How They Studied It

The researchers used two different methods to gather information. First, they collected survey responses from 287 people (including those with aphantasia and those with typical imagery) about their mental health history and symptoms. Second, they conducted in-depth interviews with 18 people who have aphantasia to hear personal stories about their "journey" through the healthcare system. They specifically looked at how these individuals experienced conditions like PTSD, depression, and anxiety.

What They Found

The study found that people with aphantasia often lack the "typical" imagery-based symptoms that doctors look for, such as visual flashbacks in PTSD. Because of this, many participants felt that mental health professionals did not understand their experience, leading to a higher risk of being misunderstood or misdiagnosed. Furthermore, many reported that standard therapy techniques—like being asked to "visualize a safe place" or "picture a future goal"—were frustrating and ineffective because they simply could not perform the requested tasks.

What This Might Mean

These findings suggest that the mental healthcare system is heavily designed for people who can see images in their minds. For those with aphantasia, this can create a barrier to effective care. While the study is based on self-reported experiences and a relatively small interview group, it highlights a need for therapists to adapt their methods. Instead of relying on visualization, clinicians might need to use more language-based or conceptual techniques to better support aphantasic clients.

One Interesting Detail

The researchers found that while people with aphantasia still experience the emotional distress of trauma, they are significantly less likely to experience "intrusive visual imagery" (distressing images that pop into the mind) compared to people with typical imagery.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain errors. Always refer to the original paper for accuracy.
Aphantasia Logo
Most-Cited Researchers
Top 10 researchers by number of papers published in Aphantasia
1

Joel Pearson

35
2

Merlin Monzel

30
3

Adam Zeman

20
4

Rebecca Keogh

17
5

Martin Reuter

16
6

Juha Silvanto

14
7

Paolo Bartolomeo

11
8

Carla Dance

10
9

Jianghao Liu

9
10

Fraser Milton

9
Recruit the largest aphantasia cohort on earth

97.7K+ users & subscribers across the imagery spectrum, plus 1.5M+ survey responses in our dataset. Skip the recruitment bottleneck and run your study with the community we've built for a decade.

Partner with us