Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Ask AI About This Paper
Ask AI About This Paper

Same same but different: the case of olfactory imagery

DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00034
Tags:
Measurement & Assessment
Arshamian, A., & Larsson, M. (n.d.). Same same but different: the case of olfactory imagery. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00034

Abstract

In the present work we present an overview of experimental findings corroborating olfactory imagery observations with the visual and auditory modalities. Overall, the results indicate that imagery of olfactory information share many features with those observed in the primary senses although some major differences are evident. One such difference pertains to the considerable individual differences observed, with the majority being unable to reproduce olfactory information in their mind. Here, we highlight factors that are positively related to an olfactory imagery capacity, such as semantic knowledge, perceptual experience, and olfactory interest that may serve as potential moderators of the large individual variation.

Authors

  • Artin Arshamian1
  • Maria Larsson1

Same same but different: the case of olfactory imagery

DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00034
Tags:
Measurement & Assessment
Arshamian, A., & Larsson, M. (n.d.). Same same but different: the case of olfactory imagery. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00034

Abstract

In the present work we present an overview of experimental findings corroborating olfactory imagery observations with the visual and auditory modalities. Overall, the results indicate that imagery of olfactory information share many features with those observed in the primary senses although some major differences are evident. One such difference pertains to the considerable individual differences observed, with the majority being unable to reproduce olfactory information in their mind. Here, we highlight factors that are positively related to an olfactory imagery capacity, such as semantic knowledge, perceptual experience, and olfactory interest that may serve as potential moderators of the large individual variation.

Authors

  • Artin Arshamian1
  • Maria Larsson1
Aphantasia Logo

What This Study Is About

This research explores "olfactory imagery"—the ability to imagine smells in the mind's eye (or "mind's nose"). The authors reviewed existing studies to see how imagining smells compares to imagining sights or sounds and why some people are much better at it than others.

How They Studied It

This was a review paper, meaning the researchers analyzed a large collection of previous experimental findings rather than conducting a single new test. They looked at data from brain scans, psychological tests, and surveys involving hundreds of participants. They specifically compared how people with high imagery skills (like professional perfumers) differ from the general population and those with "aphantasia" (a lack of mental imagery).

What They Found

The researchers found that imagining a smell activates many of the same brain areas used when actually smelling something. However, they discovered a major difference between senses: while almost everyone can picture a basic shape in their mind, the majority of people struggle to vividly imagine a specific smell. They found that "olfactory imagery" is highly dependent on expertise; for example, professional wine tasters and perfumers have much more vivid mental smells and even have different brain structures in their "smell centers" compared to non-experts.

What This Might Mean

The study suggests that while our brains process all mental imagery in similar ways, the "mind's nose" is much less developed in most people than the "mind's eye." It also suggests that mental imagery isn't just a fixed trait you are born with; it can be "plastic," meaning it can improve with practice and experience. However, because this is a review of existing work, more direct research is needed to understand if someone with total aphantasia can "train" their way into imagining smells.

One Interesting Detail

The researchers noted that the physical act of sniffing can actually help you imagine a smell more clearly. Even if there is no actual scent in the air, the motor action of your nose "searching" for a scent helps the brain trigger the mental image of that smell.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain errors. Always refer to the original paper for accuracy.
Most-Cited Researchers
Top 10 researchers by number of papers published in Aphantasia
1

Joel Pearson

35
2

Merlin Monzel

30
3

Adam Zeman

20
4

Rebecca Keogh

17
5

Martin Reuter

16
6

Juha Silvanto

14
7

Paolo Bartolomeo

11
8

Carla Dance

10
9

Jianghao Liu

9
10

Fraser Milton

9
Recruit the largest aphantasia cohort on earth

97.8K+ users & subscribers across the imagery spectrum, plus 1.5M+ survey responses in our dataset. Skip the recruitment bottleneck and run your study with the community we've built for a decade.

Partner with us