Aphantasia logo

Aphantasia logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

Theme

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Picture a horse

For professionals

  • Overview
  • Counselor course
  • Educator course
  • List your practice

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

Theme

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Events/Talk · Members only

Challenging Dual-Coding Theory

Dr Wilma Bainbridge, University of Chicago

Online, about an hour

Friday 23 January 2026

11:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET

Which would you remember tomorrow: a drawing of a key, or the word “key”?
On average, people remember pictures better than words. Researchers call it the picture superiority effect. The usual explanation, dual-coding theory, says a picture is stored twice, as an image and as a word, which gives you two ways back to it.
If that’s right, people with aphantasia shouldn’t remember pictures any better than words. Do they?

What the study found

Dr Wilma Bainbridge and her colleagues tested it in “Challenging dual-coding theory: Picture superiority effects persist in aphantasia”, published in the journal Neuropsychologia in 2026.
In all, 131 adults took part online: 62 with aphantasia and 69 typical imagers. Some were recruited through our email list.
They saw lists of line drawings, familiar symbols such as $, and written names of things, two seconds each, then typed every item they could recall. No one saw both the picture and the name of the same thing.
Both groups remembered pictures better than names, by about the same margin. Both also remembered symbols better than their names.
The typical imagers remembered more overall, but the groups clearly differed only on pictures, where people with aphantasia recalled fewer.
One pattern showed up only in aphantasia: people with aphantasia remembered symbols better than pictures, while typical imagers remembered the two equally well.
The authors conclude that seeing an image in the mind isn’t needed for the picture advantage, which challenges dual-coding theory. They think a simpler idea fits better: pictures and symbols stand out more than words, in how they look and what they mean.
Their conclusions assume the aphantasia group truly had little or no imagery. And these are group results, so they can’t tell you how any one person remembers.

What you’ll take away

  • Why pictures beat words in memory, with or without a mind’s eye
  • What dual-coding theory claims, and where this study leaves it
  • The pattern only the aphantasia group showed: symbols remembered better than pictures

About Wilma

Dr Wilma Bainbridge is an associate professor of psychology at the University of Chicago, where she leads the Brain Bridge Lab. She studies perception and memory: why some things are easier to remember than others, and how the brain picks up on that.

The recording

Watch the talkPictures Without Mental Pictures: How Aphantasia Is Rewriting a 50-Year-Old Theory of Memory

Next on the calendar

October 2026

  • Sat31Saturday 31 October, Meetup · Members onlyOctober Aphantasia Network Community Meetup11:00 AM ET11:00 AM ET

November 2026

  • Thu5Thursday 5 November, Talk · Members onlyNot everybody has an inner voiceDr Johanne Nedergård, Aarhus University11:00 AM ET11:00 AM ET
  • Wed18Wednesday 18 November, Talk · Members onlyThe mind’s eye in the witness boxDr Heather Kleider-Offutt, Georgia State University11:00 AM ET11:00 AM ET
See everything on the calendar
Aphantasia logo
Watch the talk