Thinking about touch facilitates tactile but not auditory processing
Abstract
Mental imagery is considered to be important for normal conscious experience. It is most frequently investigated in the visual, auditory and motor domain (imagination of movement), while the studies on tactile imagery (imagination of touch) are scarce. The current study investigated the effect of tactile and auditory imagery on the left/right discriminations of tactile and auditory stimuli. In line with our hypothesis, we observed that after tactile imagery, tactile stimuli were responded to faster as compared to auditory stimuli and vice versa. On average, tactile stimuli were responded to faster as compared to auditory stimuli, and stimuli in the imagery condition were on average responded to slower as compared to baseline performance (left/right discrimination without imagery assignment). The former is probably due to the spatial and somatotopic proximity of the fingers receiving the taps and the thumbs performing the response (button press), the latter to a dual task cost. Together, these results provide the first evidence of a behavioural effect of a tactile imagery assignment on the perception of real tactile stimuli.
Authors
- Helen A. Anema1
- Alyanne M. de Haan1
- Titia Gebuis1
- H. Chris Dijkerman1
What This Study Is About
How They Studied It
What They Found
- The Match Effect: If a person was imagining a touch and then felt a real tap, they were significantly faster at reacting. The same happened with sound; imagining a noise made them quicker to hear a real beep.
- The Switch Cost: If they were imagining a sound but felt a tap instead, they were slower. It’s like your brain was "tuned" to the wrong radio station and had to quickly switch frequencies to process the new information.
- Thinking is Hard: Interestingly, everyone was slower during the imagery tasks than they were at baseline (when they weren't imagining anything). This shows that using your "mental monitor" takes up a lot of brainpower!