The Four-Factor Imagination Scale (FFIS): a measure for assessing frequency, complexity, emotional valence, and directedness of imagination

Zabelina and CondonOctober 2020

Abstract
What This Study Is About
How They Studied It
What They Found
What This Might Mean
One Interesting Detail
Authors
Cite this paper

Abstract

Recent findings in psychological research have begun to illuminate cognitive and neural mechanisms of imagination and mental imagery, and have highlighted

Our summary in plain words

What This Study Is About

Researchers wanted to create a better way to measure imagination. While many people think of imagination only as "mental imagery"—the ability to picture things in the mind—this study suggests it is actually a combination of several different traits that can be measured separately.

How They Studied It

The researchers developed a new 26-item questionnaire called the Four-Factor Imagination Scale (FFIS). They tested this tool with over 1,200 participants who answered questions about how they use their minds. The study looked at four specific areas: how often people imagine things (Frequency), how detailed those thoughts are (Complexity), whether the thoughts are positive or negative (Emotional Valence), and whether the imagination is purposeful or random (Directedness).

What They Found

The study confirmed that imagination is not just one single "thing" but a mix of these four distinct factors. They found that people who have high "Complexity" in their imagination—meaning their mental worlds are very detailed—tend to be more open to new experiences and creative. Interestingly, they found that how often someone imagines things (Frequency) is often linked to higher levels of anxiety, while the emotional tone of those imaginings is closely tied to a person's overall sense of well-being.

What This Might Mean

This research suggests that "imagination" is a complex toolkit rather than a single skill. For people with aphantasia—the inability to voluntarily create mental images—this framework is helpful because it shows that imagination involves more than just "picturing." Even without mental photos, a person might still have a high "Frequency" of imaginative thoughts or a high degree of "Directedness" in their creative thinking. However, because this study relies on self-reporting, it measures how people feel about their minds rather than their actual performance on tasks.

One Interesting Detail

The researchers found that "Directedness"—the ability to keep your imagination focused on a specific goal—was strongly linked to being a conscientious and organized person, suggesting that imagination isn't just for "daydreaming" but is a key tool for planning and self-control.

This summary was written with AI and may contain errors. Check the original paper.

Authors

Darya L. Zabelina
1 paper in the library
David M. Condon
2 papers in the library

Cite this paper

Zabelina, D. L., & Condon, D. M. (2020). The four-factor imagination scale (ffis): a measure for assessing frequency, complexity, emotional valence, and directedness of imagination. Psychological Research, 84(8), 2287–2299. doi:10.1007/s00426-019-01227-w

Topics

Measurement & Assessment

Most-cited researchers

Recruit participants for your study

We can help you reach people across the imagery spectrum, from aphantasia to hyperphantasia.

Partner with us

Image-Free Insights

A short note from our founder, Tom Ebeyer, every other week, plus occasional news and invitations to take part in studies. Change what you get from any email.

Research Psychological Research

The Four-Factor Imagination Scale (FFIS): a measure for assessing frequency, complexity, emotional valence, and directedness of imagination

Zabelina and CondonOctober 2020

Read the paper

Abstract
What This Study Is About
How They Studied It
What They Found
What This Might Mean
One Interesting Detail
Authors
Cite this paper

Abstract

Recent findings in psychological research have begun to illuminate cognitive and neural mechanisms of imagination and mental imagery, and have highlighted

Our summary in plain words

What This Study Is About

How They Studied It

What They Found

What This Might Mean

One Interesting Detail

This summary was written with AI and may contain errors. Check the original paper.

Authors

Darya L. Zabelina
1 paper in the library
David M. Condon
2 papers in the library

Cite this paper

Topics

Measurement & Assessment

Most-cited researchers

Recruit participants for your study

We can help you reach people across the imagery spectrum, from aphantasia to hyperphantasia.

Partner with us

More research

All research

2026

Imaginary Presence—Merleau-Ponty and Mental Imagery

Deery · Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences

This philosophy paper asks how Merleau-Ponty's ideas would explain the perception-like feel of mental images. It argues that neither the view of images as perceptual representations nor the view of them as simulations explains that feel, and proposes instead that imagining something means partly taking up the bodily stance one would have if it were really there, bringing a vague sense of how it could look. In a footnote, the author suggests that people with aphantasia keep this capacity for perception but cannot use it on purpose to make absent things appear, while calling aphantasia beyond the paper's scope.

2026

Imagery in affective and neurodevelopmental conditions: an insula-based interoceptive framework

Kvamme, Nagai and Silvanto · Trends Open

In this opinion article, the authors propose that the brain's processing of body signals, centered on the anterior insula, is a shared source of both mental imagery and emotion. On this view, conditions such as depression, anxiety, PTSD, autism and ADHD change imagery because they disturb this same system, and body-focused treatments might help restore imagery. The authors say the causal direction has not yet been shown and call for long-term and treatment studies to test it.

2026

Seeing without eyes: Relation between visual mental imagery and visual hallucinations

Panigutti and colleagues · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

This systematic review found only 11 studies on imagery and hallucinations in Parkinson's, Alzheimer's and schizophrenia, and none in Lewy body dementia. Seven reported a link and four did not, so the evidence is indecisive.

Image-Free Insights

A short note from our founder, Tom Ebeyer, every other week, plus occasional news and invitations to take part in studies. Change what you get from any email.