Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Ask AI About This Paper
Ask AI About This Paper

Remembering is an imaginative project

DOI: 10.1007/s11098-024-02220-9
Tags:
Memory
Goldwasser, S. (2024). Remembering is an imaginative project. Philosophical Studies, 181(11), 2897–2933. doi:10.1007/s11098-024-02220-9

Abstract

This essay defends the claim that episodic remembering is a mental action by arguing that episodic remembering and sensory- or experience-like imagining are of a kind in a way relevant for agency. Episodic remembering is a type of imaginative project that involves the agential construction of imagistic-content and that aims at (veridically) representing particular events of the personal past. Neurally intact adults under normal conditions can token experiential memories of particular events from the personal past (merely) by intending or trying to. An agent’s ability to actively remember depends not only on her being able to determine that some memory event occurs but on her ability to construct the relevant scene at will as well. I claim that the ability to guide construction with respect to imagistic-content is distinctive feature of a subset of active imagining. Episodic remembering is of a kind with that subset of active imagining by being a process of agential construction of imagistic-content, in this case, scene construction that aims at (veridically) representing the personal past. Agential scene construction in the context of remembering is the agent’s exploring her personal past as a highly circumscribed region of modal space.

Authors

  • Seth Goldwasser1

Remembering is an imaginative project

DOI: 10.1007/s11098-024-02220-9
Tags:
Memory
Goldwasser, S. (2024). Remembering is an imaginative project. Philosophical Studies, 181(11), 2897–2933. doi:10.1007/s11098-024-02220-9

Abstract

This essay defends the claim that episodic remembering is a mental action by arguing that episodic remembering and sensory- or experience-like imagining are of a kind in a way relevant for agency. Episodic remembering is a type of imaginative project that involves the agential construction of imagistic-content and that aims at (veridically) representing particular events of the personal past. Neurally intact adults under normal conditions can token experiential memories of particular events from the personal past (merely) by intending or trying to. An agent’s ability to actively remember depends not only on her being able to determine that some memory event occurs but on her ability to construct the relevant scene at will as well. I claim that the ability to guide construction with respect to imagistic-content is distinctive feature of a subset of active imagining. Episodic remembering is of a kind with that subset of active imagining by being a process of agential construction of imagistic-content, in this case, scene construction that aims at (veridically) representing the personal past. Agential scene construction in the context of remembering is the agent’s exploring her personal past as a highly circumscribed region of modal space.

Authors

  • Seth Goldwasser1
Aphantasia Logo

What This Study Is About

This paper explores whether remembering our past is a "mental action"—something we intentionally do, like solving a puzzle—rather than something that just happens to us. The researcher argues that the act of recalling personal memories is actually a form of active imagination.

How They Studied It

This is a philosophical study rather than a laboratory experiment. The author analyzed existing theories of memory and "mental agency" (our ability to control our own thoughts). By looking at how we "construct" memories of the past, the author compared the process of remembering to other mental tasks, such as imagining a future event or visualizing a fictional scene. The paper specifically examines "episodic memory," which is the ability to remember specific personal experiences, like a past birthday party.

What They Found

The author concludes that remembering is an "imaginative project." When we try to recall a past event, we aren't just hitting "play" on a recording; we are actively building a mental scene. The study suggests that even though memory is supposed to be "true" to what actually happened, the process of bringing that information to mind is a skillful action. This means that memory and imagination are not two separate systems in the brain, but are instead part of the same toolkit we use to create mental content.

What This Might Mean

For people with aphantasia—the inability to voluntarily create mental imagery (the "mind's eye")—this research offers a new way to think about memory. It suggests that even if someone cannot "see" a memory, the effort they make to reconstruct the facts and feelings of the past is still an imaginative act. This shifts the focus away from the "picture" in the head and toward the "action" of the mind. It suggests that aphantasia might be a difference in how the "construction" is displayed, rather than a total lack of the ability to "reconstruct" the past.

One Interesting Detail

The paper distinguishes between "unbidden" memories that pop into your head without warning and "active" remembering. It argues that active remembering is a "basic action," meaning we can do it directly just by intending to, similar to how we decide to move our arm or focus our attention.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain errors. Always refer to the original paper for accuracy.
Most-Cited Researchers
Top 10 researchers by number of papers published in Aphantasia
1

Joel Pearson

35
2

Merlin Monzel

30
3

Adam Zeman

20
4

Rebecca Keogh

17
5

Martin Reuter

16
6

Juha Silvanto

14
7

Paolo Bartolomeo

11
8

Carla Dance

10
9

Jianghao Liu

9
10

Fraser Milton

9
Recruit the largest aphantasia cohort on earth

97.4K+ users & subscribers across the imagery spectrum, plus 1.5M+ survey responses in our dataset. Skip the recruitment bottleneck and run your study with the community we've built for a decade.

Partner with us