Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Ask AI About This Paper
Ask AI About This Paper

Content determination in dreams supports the imagination theory

DOI: 10.1007/s11098-024-02250-3
Tags:
Dreams
Gregory, D. (2024). Content determination in dreams supports the imagination theory. Philosophical Studies, 181(11), 3037–3057. doi:10.1007/s11098-024-02250-3

Abstract

There are two leading theories about the ontology of dreams. One holds that dreams involve hallucinations and beliefs. The other holds that dreaming involves sensory and propositional imagining. I highlight two features of dreams which are more easily explained by the imagination theory. One is that certain things seem to be true in our dreams, even though they are not represented sensorily; this is easily explained if dreams involve propositional imagining. The other is that dream narratives can be temporally segmented, involving events which take place across long spans of time; this makes sense if dreams involve sensory imagining, for we often sensorily imagine narratives during wakefulness in the same way. The two considerations are unified by the fact that both highlight forms of content determination characteristic of imagining.

Authors

  • Daniel Gregory1

Content determination in dreams supports the imagination theory

DOI: 10.1007/s11098-024-02250-3
Tags:
Dreams
Gregory, D. (2024). Content determination in dreams supports the imagination theory. Philosophical Studies, 181(11), 3037–3057. doi:10.1007/s11098-024-02250-3

Abstract

There are two leading theories about the ontology of dreams. One holds that dreams involve hallucinations and beliefs. The other holds that dreaming involves sensory and propositional imagining. I highlight two features of dreams which are more easily explained by the imagination theory. One is that certain things seem to be true in our dreams, even though they are not represented sensorily; this is easily explained if dreams involve propositional imagining. The other is that dream narratives can be temporally segmented, involving events which take place across long spans of time; this makes sense if dreams involve sensory imagining, for we often sensorily imagine narratives during wakefulness in the same way. The two considerations are unified by the fact that both highlight forms of content determination characteristic of imagining.

Authors

  • Daniel Gregory1
Aphantasia Logo

What This Study Is About

This research explores whether dreaming is more like "perceiving" (seeing something real) or "imagining" (picturing something in your mind). The author argues that dreams are a form of imagination, which helps explain why we can dream about complex stories and specific people without actually believing those things are happening in the moment.

How They Studied It

This is a philosophical study rather than a laboratory experiment. The researcher analyzed existing theories of dreaming and compared them against how human memory and belief systems work. By looking at logical "objections"—such as why we don't wake up still believing our dream was real—the author tested which theory best fits the human experience.

What They Found

The study argues that the "imagination theory" is stronger than the "orthodox theory" (which views dreams as hallucinations or false perceptions). Key points include:
  • Belief Persistence: If dreams were hallucinations, we would likely wake up with "leftover" false beliefs. Since we usually recognize a dream as a dream immediately upon waking, it suggests our brain was imagining, not perceiving.
  • Narrative Structure: Dreams often jump through time and space like a movie. The author argues this is only possible through "designation"—a mental process where we decide a scene represents a specific person or time—which is a hallmark of imagination.
  • Aphantasia Connection: While not the primary focus, the theory supports the idea that dreaming and waking mental imagery (the ability to picture things in your mind) are distinct processes, explaining why some people with aphantasia can still have vivid dreams.

What This Might Mean

This suggests that dreaming is a creative, active process of the mind rather than a passive "glitch" in our visual system. It implies that the brain uses different "wiring" for dreaming than it does for seeing the real world. However, because this is a philosophical argument, it provides a framework for future brain-scan studies rather than a final biological proof.

One Interesting Detail

The author compares dreams to films: just as a movie uses "labels" to tell you that an actor represents a specific historical figure, our dreams use "mental labels" to tell us who someone is, even if they don't look exactly like that person in the dream.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain errors. Always refer to the original paper for accuracy.
Most-Cited Researchers
Top 10 researchers by number of papers published in Aphantasia
1

Joel Pearson

35
2

Merlin Monzel

30
3

Adam Zeman

20
4

Rebecca Keogh

17
5

Martin Reuter

16
6

Juha Silvanto

14
7

Paolo Bartolomeo

11
8

Carla Dance

10
9

Jianghao Liu

9
10

Fraser Milton

9
Recruit the largest aphantasia cohort on earth

97.4K+ users & subscribers across the imagery spectrum, plus 1.5M+ survey responses in our dataset. Skip the recruitment bottleneck and run your study with the community we've built for a decade.

Partner with us