Content determination in dreams supports the imagination theory
Abstract
There are two leading theories about the ontology of dreams. One holds that dreams involve hallucinations and beliefs. The other holds that dreaming involves sensory and propositional imagining. I highlight two features of dreams which are more easily explained by the imagination theory. One is that certain things seem to be true in our dreams, even though they are not represented sensorily; this is easily explained if dreams involve propositional imagining. The other is that dream narratives can be temporally segmented, involving events which take place across long spans of time; this makes sense if dreams involve sensory imagining, for we often sensorily imagine narratives during wakefulness in the same way. The two considerations are unified by the fact that both highlight forms of content determination characteristic of imagining.
Authors
- Daniel Gregory1
What This Study Is About
How They Studied It
What They Found
- The "Labeling" Trick: In dreams, you often just *know* who someone is, even if they don't look like themselves. For example, you might see a cat but "know" it’s actually your best friend. This is exactly how imagination works—you "label" the thoughts you create.
- The Movie Edit: Dreams have "time skips." You might be at a bank robbery, and a second later, you’re in the getaway car. Real-life experiences (and hallucinations) usually feel continuous, but dreams skip the boring parts, just like a movie or a story you're imagining.