Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Ask AI About This Paper
Ask AI About This Paper

Beyond words: Examining the role of mental imagery for the Stroop effect by contrasting aphantasics and controls

DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106120
Tags:
CognitionTheory & Definitions
Monzel, M., Rademacher, J., Krempel, R., & Reuter, M. (2025). Beyond words: examining the role of mental imagery for the stroop effect by contrasting aphantasics and controls. Cognition, 259, 106120. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106120

Abstract

One of the best replicated and most famous effects in experimental psychology, the Stroop effect, describes interferences in cognitive processing when a color word is printed in a conflicting ink color. Recently, the controversial hypothesis was proposed that reading the color word triggers visual imagery, which then interferes with the perceived color, leading to the Stroop effect. Thus, the Stroop effect should not occur in aphantasics, i.e., in individuals with impaired mental imagery. We tested this intriguing hypothesis in a rare sample of 151 aphantasics and 110 controls. Results show that the Stroop effect was reduced in aphantasics, albeit still existing. For the first time, the present data show that an interference between mental imagery and perception is partially responsible for the Stroop effect.

Authors

  • Merlin Monzel30
  • Janik Rademacher1
  • Raquel Krempel3
  • Martin Reuter16

Beyond words: Examining the role of mental imagery for the Stroop effect by contrasting aphantasics and controls

DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106120
Tags:
CognitionTheory & Definitions
Monzel, M., Rademacher, J., Krempel, R., & Reuter, M. (2025). Beyond words: examining the role of mental imagery for the stroop effect by contrasting aphantasics and controls. Cognition, 259, 106120. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106120

Abstract

One of the best replicated and most famous effects in experimental psychology, the Stroop effect, describes interferences in cognitive processing when a color word is printed in a conflicting ink color. Recently, the controversial hypothesis was proposed that reading the color word triggers visual imagery, which then interferes with the perceived color, leading to the Stroop effect. Thus, the Stroop effect should not occur in aphantasics, i.e., in individuals with impaired mental imagery. We tested this intriguing hypothesis in a rare sample of 151 aphantasics and 110 controls. Results show that the Stroop effect was reduced in aphantasics, albeit still existing. For the first time, the present data show that an interference between mental imagery and perception is partially responsible for the Stroop effect.

Authors

  • Merlin Monzel30
  • Janik Rademacher1
  • Raquel Krempel3
  • Martin Reuter16
Aphantasia Logo

What This Study Is About

Researchers investigated whether the "Stroop effect"—a famous psychological phenomenon where it is harder to name a color if the word itself spells a different color (like the word "RED" printed in blue ink)—is caused by the brain automatically creating a mental picture of the word. By testing people with aphantasia (the inability to create mental images), the study aimed to see if lacking a "mind's eye" would change how they experience this classic mental conflict.

How They Studied It

The study involved 261 participants: 151 with aphantasia and 110 "controls" (people with typical mental imagery). Participants completed a digital Stroop task where they had to quickly identify the ink color of various words. Some words were "congruent" (the word "BLUE" in blue ink), while others were "incongruent" (the word "BLUE" in red ink). The researchers measured how accurately and how quickly participants responded in both groups.

What They Found

The researchers discovered that the Stroop effect was significantly reduced in people with aphantasia. While both groups were slower when the word and color didn't match, the aphantasic group was more accurate than the control group during these conflicting trials. Specifically, people with aphantasia were less likely to be "tripped up" by the mismatching word, suggesting that because they don't automatically visualize the color the word describes, they face less internal interference.

What This Might Mean

These results suggest that mental imagery—the ability to picture things in your mind—is not just a "bonus" feature of the brain, but a process that actively interferes with how we see the world. It supports the theory that for most people, reading a color word triggers an automatic, involuntary mental image that competes with the actual color they are looking at. However, since aphantasics still showed some Stroop effect, it proves that imagery is only part of the story; other language and attention processes also play a role.

One Interesting Detail

Even though people with aphantasia were more accurate when facing conflicting colors and words, they were generally slightly slower to respond across all tasks than the control group. This suggests they might use different, perhaps more deliberate, mental strategies to process colors and words.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain errors. Always refer to the original paper for accuracy.
Most-Cited Researchers
Top 10 researchers by number of papers published in Aphantasia
1

Joel Pearson

35
2

Merlin Monzel

30
3

Adam Zeman

20
4

Rebecca Keogh

17
5

Martin Reuter

16
6

Juha Silvanto

14
7

Paolo Bartolomeo

11
8

Carla Dance

10
9

Jianghao Liu

9
10

Fraser Milton

9
Recruit the largest aphantasia cohort on earth

97.7K+ users & subscribers across the imagery spectrum, plus 1.5M+ survey responses in our dataset. Skip the recruitment bottleneck and run your study with the community we've built for a decade.

Partner with us