Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Ask AI About This Paper
Ask AI About This Paper

Subjective signal strength distinguishes reality from imagination

DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-37322-1
Tags:
Measurement & AssessmentHallucinations & Perception
Dijkstra, N., & Fleming, S. M. (2023). Subjective signal strength distinguishes reality from imagination. Nature Communications, 14(1). doi:10.1038/s41467-023-37322-1

Abstract

Humans are voracious imaginers, with internal simulations supporting memory, planning and decision-making. Because the neural mechanisms supporting imagery overlap with those supporting perception, a foundational question is how reality and imagination are kept apart. One possibility is that the intention to imagine is used to identify and discount self-generated signals during imagery. Alternatively, because internally generated signals are generally weaker, sensory strength is used to index reality. Traditional psychology experiments struggle to investigate this issue as subjects can rapidly learn that real stimuli are in play. Here, we combined one-trial-per-participant psychophysics with computational modelling and neuroimaging to show that imagined and perceived signals are in fact intermixed, with judgments of reality being determined by whether this intermixed signal is strong enough to cross a reality threshold. A consequence of this account is that when virtual or imagined signals are strong enough, they become subjectively indistinguishable from reality.

Authors

  • Nadine Dijkstra5
  • Stephen M. Fleming2

Subjective signal strength distinguishes reality from imagination

DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-37322-1
Tags:
Measurement & AssessmentHallucinations & Perception
Dijkstra, N., & Fleming, S. M. (2023). Subjective signal strength distinguishes reality from imagination. Nature Communications, 14(1). doi:10.1038/s41467-023-37322-1

Abstract

Humans are voracious imaginers, with internal simulations supporting memory, planning and decision-making. Because the neural mechanisms supporting imagery overlap with those supporting perception, a foundational question is how reality and imagination are kept apart. One possibility is that the intention to imagine is used to identify and discount self-generated signals during imagery. Alternatively, because internally generated signals are generally weaker, sensory strength is used to index reality. Traditional psychology experiments struggle to investigate this issue as subjects can rapidly learn that real stimuli are in play. Here, we combined one-trial-per-participant psychophysics with computational modelling and neuroimaging to show that imagined and perceived signals are in fact intermixed, with judgments of reality being determined by whether this intermixed signal is strong enough to cross a reality threshold. A consequence of this account is that when virtual or imagined signals are strong enough, they become subjectively indistinguishable from reality.

Authors

  • Nadine Dijkstra5
  • Stephen M. Fleming2
Aphantasia Logo

What This Study Is About

Researchers investigated how the brain distinguishes between things we actually see and things we only imagine. They specifically looked at whether mental imagery (the ability to picture things in your mind) and real-world perception are processed separately or if they mix together to create a single experience.

How They Studied It

The study used a combination of computer modeling, brain scans (fMRI), and a large-scale experiment with over 400 participants. In the main experiment, people were asked to imagine a specific pattern while looking at a screen of visual noise (like television static). On the final trial, without warning, the researchers slowly faded in a real, faint image that either matched or differed from what the person was imagining. Participants then had to report how vivid their imagery was and whether they thought a real image had actually appeared.

What They Found

The researchers discovered that the brain does not keep imagination and reality in separate "folders." Instead, they found that mental imagery and real-world vision are mixed together. When a person's mental image was very vivid, they were much more likely to believe they were seeing a real object, even if nothing was there. Conversely, when a real image was present, it made their mental imagery feel more vivid. The brain scans showed that while different areas handle the "what" of an image, the same parts of the brain's frontal cortex are used to judge the "strength" of both real and imagined sights.

What This Might Mean

This suggests that "reality monitoring"—our ability to tell what is real—is based on a simple threshold of sensory strength. If a signal in the brain is strong enough, we label it as "real." This helps explain why people with very vivid imagery might occasionally mistake a thought for a perception. While the study did not focus exclusively on aphantasia (the inability to form mental images), it notes that people with aphantasia may have a different relationship with this "reality threshold" because their internal signals are naturally much weaker.

One Interesting Detail

The study found that if your mental image is strong enough, it becomes literally indistinguishable from reality. In the experiment, when the imagined and real images matched, participants were significantly more likely to "see" the real image sooner, proving that imagination actually boosts our visual sensitivity.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain errors. Always refer to the original paper for accuracy.
Most-Cited Researchers
Top 10 researchers by number of papers published in Aphantasia
1

Joel Pearson

35
2

Merlin Monzel

31
3

Adam Zeman

20
4

Rebecca Keogh

17
5

Martin Reuter

16
6

Juha Silvanto

15
7

Paolo Bartolomeo

11
8

Carla Dance

10
9

Jianghao Liu

10
10

Fraser Milton

9
Recruit the largest aphantasia cohort on earth

98.1K+ users & subscribers across the imagery spectrum, plus 1.5M+ survey responses in our dataset. Skip the recruitment bottleneck and run your study with the community we've built for a decade.

Partner with us