Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Ask AI About This Paper
Ask AI About This Paper

A cognitive profile of multi-sensory imagery, memory and dreaming in aphantasia

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-65705-7
Tags:
Memory
Dawes, A. J., Keogh, R., Andrillon, T., & Pearson, J. (2020). A cognitive profile of multi-sensory imagery, memory and dreaming in aphantasia. Scientific Reports, 10(1). doi:10.1038/s41598-020-65705-7

Abstract

For most people, visual imagery is an innate feature of many of our internal experiences, and appears to play a critical role in supporting core cognitive processes. Some individuals, however, lack the ability to voluntarily generate visual imagery altogether – a condition termed “aphantasia”. Recent research suggests that aphantasia is a condition defined by the absence of visual imagery, rather than a lack of metacognitive awareness of internal visual imagery. Here we further illustrate a cognitive “fingerprint” of aphantasia, demonstrating that compared to control participants with imagery ability, aphantasic individuals report decreased imagery in other sensory domains, although not all report a complete lack of multi-sensory imagery. They also report less vivid and phenomenologically rich autobiographical memories and imagined future scenarios, suggesting a constructive role for visual imagery in representing episodic events. Interestingly, aphantasic individuals report fewer and qualitatively impoverished dreams compared to controls. However, spatial abilities appear unaffected, and aphantasic individuals do not appear to be considerably protected against all forms of trauma symptomatology in response to stressful life events. Collectively, these data suggest that imagery may be a normative representational tool for wider cognitive processes, highlighting the large inter-individual variability that characterises our internal mental representations.

Authors

  • Alexei Joel Dawes3
  • Rebecca Keogh17
  • Thomas Andrillon2
  • Joel Pearson35

A cognitive profile of multi-sensory imagery, memory and dreaming in aphantasia

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-65705-7
Tags:
Memory
Dawes, A. J., Keogh, R., Andrillon, T., & Pearson, J. (2020). A cognitive profile of multi-sensory imagery, memory and dreaming in aphantasia. Scientific Reports, 10(1). doi:10.1038/s41598-020-65705-7

Abstract

For most people, visual imagery is an innate feature of many of our internal experiences, and appears to play a critical role in supporting core cognitive processes. Some individuals, however, lack the ability to voluntarily generate visual imagery altogether – a condition termed “aphantasia”. Recent research suggests that aphantasia is a condition defined by the absence of visual imagery, rather than a lack of metacognitive awareness of internal visual imagery. Here we further illustrate a cognitive “fingerprint” of aphantasia, demonstrating that compared to control participants with imagery ability, aphantasic individuals report decreased imagery in other sensory domains, although not all report a complete lack of multi-sensory imagery. They also report less vivid and phenomenologically rich autobiographical memories and imagined future scenarios, suggesting a constructive role for visual imagery in representing episodic events. Interestingly, aphantasic individuals report fewer and qualitatively impoverished dreams compared to controls. However, spatial abilities appear unaffected, and aphantasic individuals do not appear to be considerably protected against all forms of trauma symptomatology in response to stressful life events. Collectively, these data suggest that imagery may be a normative representational tool for wider cognitive processes, highlighting the large inter-individual variability that characterises our internal mental representations.

Authors

  • Alexei Joel Dawes3
  • Rebecca Keogh17
  • Thomas Andrillon2
  • Joel Pearson35
Aphantasia Logo

What This Study Is About

This study explores how aphantasia—the inability to voluntarily create mental images—affects other parts of a person's inner life. Researchers wanted to know if people with aphantasia also experience differences in other senses (like hearing or touch), their memory of the past, their ability to imagine the future, and their dreams.

How They Studied It

The researchers compared 267 people with aphantasia to 400 people who can visualize (the control group). Participants completed several detailed questionnaires that measured:
  • Multi-sensory imagery: The ability to "hear" sounds, "smell" scents, or "feel" textures in the mind.
  • Autobiographical memory: How vividly they remember personal life events.
  • Dreaming: The frequency and sensory richness of their night dreams.
  • Spatial ability: Their skill at navigating or remembering where objects are located.

What They Found

The study revealed that aphantasia is often more than just a lack of visual imagery. People with aphantasia reported significantly lower imagery in other senses, such as sound, touch, and taste. They also found it harder to vividly remember their past or imagine future scenarios. Interestingly, while they reported dreaming less often and with less detail than the control group, their spatial memory (knowing where things are) remained just as strong as those who can visualize.

What This Might Mean

These findings suggest that aphantasia may be part of a broader "multi-sensory" difference in how some people process information. It suggests that visual imagery—the "mind's eye"—acts as a helpful tool for most people to anchor memories and dreams. However, the fact that spatial skills were unaffected shows that the brain has different pathways for "seeing" a picture versus "knowing" where things are in space. Because this study relied on self-reports, future research using brain scans could help confirm these internal experiences.

One Interesting Detail

While people with aphantasia struggle to "see" memories, they are just as good as everyone else at remembering factual information about their lives; they simply remember the facts of what happened rather than "re-watching" the event in their minds.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain errors. Always refer to the original paper for accuracy.
Most-Cited Researchers
Top 10 researchers by number of papers published in Aphantasia
1

Joel Pearson

35
2

Merlin Monzel

31
3

Adam Zeman

20
4

Rebecca Keogh

17
5

Martin Reuter

16
6

Juha Silvanto

15
7

Paolo Bartolomeo

11
8

Carla Dance

10
9

Jianghao Liu

10
10

Fraser Milton

9
Recruit the largest aphantasia cohort on earth

97.9K+ users & subscribers across the imagery spectrum, plus 1.5M+ survey responses in our dataset. Skip the recruitment bottleneck and run your study with the community we've built for a decade.

Partner with us