Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Ask AI About This Paper
Ask AI About This Paper

The Content of Imagined Sounds Changes Visual Motion Perception in the Cross-Bounce Illusion

DOI: 10.1038/srep40123
Tags:
Measurement & Assessment
Berger, C. C., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2017). The content of imagined sounds changes visual motion perception in the cross-bounce illusion. Scientific Reports, 7(1). doi:DOI: 10.1038/srep40123

Abstract

Can what we imagine hearing change what we see? Whether imagined sensory stimuli are integrated with external sensory stimuli to shape our perception of the world has only recently begun to come under scrutiny. Here, we made use of the cross-bounce illusion in which an auditory stimulus presented at the moment two passing objects meet promotes the perception that the objects bounce off rather than cross by one another to examine whether the content of imagined sound changes visual motion perception in a manner that is consistent with multisensory integration. The results from this study revealed that auditory imagery of a sound with acoustic properties typical of a collision (i.e., damped sound) promoted the bounce-percept, but auditory imagery of the same sound played backwards (i.e., ramped sound) did not. Moreover, the vividness of the participants’ auditory imagery predicted the strength of this imagery-induced illusion. In a separate experiment, we ruled out the possibility that changes in attention (i.e., sensitivity index d′) or response bias (response bias index c) were sufficient to explain this effect. Together, these findings suggest that this imagery-induced multisensory illusion reflects the successful integration of real and imagined cross-modal sensory stimuli, and more generally, that what we imagine hearing can change what we see.

Authors

  • Christopher C. Berger1
  • H. Henrik Ehrsson1

The Content of Imagined Sounds Changes Visual Motion Perception in the Cross-Bounce Illusion

DOI: 10.1038/srep40123
Tags:
Measurement & Assessment
Berger, C. C., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2017). The content of imagined sounds changes visual motion perception in the cross-bounce illusion. Scientific Reports, 7(1). doi:DOI: 10.1038/srep40123

Abstract

Can what we imagine hearing change what we see? Whether imagined sensory stimuli are integrated with external sensory stimuli to shape our perception of the world has only recently begun to come under scrutiny. Here, we made use of the cross-bounce illusion in which an auditory stimulus presented at the moment two passing objects meet promotes the perception that the objects bounce off rather than cross by one another to examine whether the content of imagined sound changes visual motion perception in a manner that is consistent with multisensory integration. The results from this study revealed that auditory imagery of a sound with acoustic properties typical of a collision (i.e., damped sound) promoted the bounce-percept, but auditory imagery of the same sound played backwards (i.e., ramped sound) did not. Moreover, the vividness of the participants’ auditory imagery predicted the strength of this imagery-induced illusion. In a separate experiment, we ruled out the possibility that changes in attention (i.e., sensitivity index d′) or response bias (response bias index c) were sufficient to explain this effect. Together, these findings suggest that this imagery-induced multisensory illusion reflects the successful integration of real and imagined cross-modal sensory stimuli, and more generally, that what we imagine hearing can change what we see.

Authors

  • Christopher C. Berger1
  • H. Henrik Ehrsson1
Aphantasia Logo

What This Study Is About

Researchers investigated whether the sounds we imagine in our minds can change how we see the physical world. Specifically, they looked at whether imagining a "collision" sound could trick the brain into seeing two objects bounce off each other instead of passing through one another.

How They Studied It

The study involved 72 participants divided into three experiments. Participants watched an animation of two identical discs moving toward each other, overlapping, and then moving apart. This is known as the "cross-bounce illusion" because the discs can look like they either passed through each other or bounced off.
Participants were asked to imagine different types of sounds at the exact moment the discs met:
  • A "damped" sound (like a sharp "thud" or "clink" typical of a collision).
  • A "ramped" sound (the same sound played backward, which does not sound like a collision).
  • No sound at all.
The researchers also tested whether the vividness of a person's mental imagery—their ability to create clear "pictures" or "sounds" in their mind—affected the results.

What They Found

The study found that when people imagined a collision sound, they were significantly more likely to see the discs bounce rather than pass through each other. However, imagining the non-collision (backward) sound had no such effect.
Crucially, the more vivid a participant’s auditory imagery was, the stronger the illusion became. The researchers also ruled out the idea that participants were simply "guessing" or paying less attention; the imagined sound actually changed their sensory perception of the movement.

What This Might Mean

This suggests that the brain integrates mental imagery (what we imagine) with real sensory input (what we see) to create our final experience of reality. It shows that imagery isn't just a weak copy of perception, but a functional tool the brain uses to make sense of the world. For those with aphantasia—the inability to voluntarily create mental images—this raises interesting questions about whether they would experience this specific illusion in the same way.

One Interesting Detail

The illusion only worked when the imagined sound "matched" the visual event. Because a "thud" makes sense for a collision but a backward "whoop" does not, the brain only combined the imagined sound with the visual movement when the two pieces of information felt like they belonged together.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain errors. Always refer to the original paper for accuracy.
Most-Cited Researchers
Top 10 researchers by number of papers published in Aphantasia
1

Joel Pearson

35
2

Merlin Monzel

30
3

Adam Zeman

20
4

Rebecca Keogh

17
5

Martin Reuter

16
6

Juha Silvanto

14
7

Paolo Bartolomeo

11
8

Carla Dance

10
9

Jianghao Liu

9
10

Fraser Milton

9
Recruit the largest aphantasia cohort on earth

97.4K+ users & subscribers across the imagery spectrum, plus 1.5M+ survey responses in our dataset. Skip the recruitment bottleneck and run your study with the community we've built for a decade.

Partner with us