Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Ask AI About This Paper
Ask AI About This Paper

Plural Imagination: Diversity in Mind and Making

DOI: 10.1080/00043249.2022.2110444
Tags:
Creativity
MacKisack, M., Aldworth, S., Macpherson, F., Onians, J., Winlove, C., & Zeman, A. (2022). Plural imagination: diversity in mind and making. Art Journal, 81(3), 70–87. doi:10.1080/00043249.2022.2110444

Abstract

The experience of visual mental imagery—seeing in the mind’s eye—varies widely between individuals, but perhaps because we tend to assume our own way of thinking to be everyone’s, how this crucial variation impacts art practice, and indeed art history, has barely been addressed. We seek to correct this omission by pursuing the implications of how artists with aphantasia (the absence of mental imagery) and hyperphantasia (imagery of extreme vividness) describe their working processes. The findings remind us of the need to challenge normative, universalizing models of art making and art maker.

Authors

  • Matthew MacKisack4
  • Susan Aldworth2
  • Fiona Macpherson4
  • John Onians2
  • Crawford Winlove5
  • Adam Zeman20

Plural Imagination: Diversity in Mind and Making

DOI: 10.1080/00043249.2022.2110444
Tags:
Creativity
MacKisack, M., Aldworth, S., Macpherson, F., Onians, J., Winlove, C., & Zeman, A. (2022). Plural imagination: diversity in mind and making. Art Journal, 81(3), 70–87. doi:10.1080/00043249.2022.2110444

Abstract

The experience of visual mental imagery—seeing in the mind’s eye—varies widely between individuals, but perhaps because we tend to assume our own way of thinking to be everyone’s, how this crucial variation impacts art practice, and indeed art history, has barely been addressed. We seek to correct this omission by pursuing the implications of how artists with aphantasia (the absence of mental imagery) and hyperphantasia (imagery of extreme vividness) describe their working processes. The findings remind us of the need to challenge normative, universalizing models of art making and art maker.

Authors

  • Matthew MacKisack4
  • Susan Aldworth2
  • Fiona Macpherson4
  • John Onians2
  • Crawford Winlove5
  • Adam Zeman20
Aphantasia Logo

What This Study Is About

This research explores how artists create work when they cannot "see" images in their mind, a condition known as aphantasia. It challenges the traditional idea that all art must begin as a clear mental picture before it is put onto paper or canvas.

How They Studied It

The researchers looked at the creative processes of 18 different artists who participated in an exhibition called Extreme Imagination. This group included 12 artists with aphantasia and 6 "hyperphantasic" artists (those with exceptionally vivid mental imagery). The team interviewed the artists and analyzed their personal descriptions of how they move from an initial idea to a finished piece of art.

What They Found

The study found that aphantasic artists often rely on "external" rather than "internal" starting points. Instead of visualizing a finished scene in their heads, they might use reference photos, physical objects, or "blind" marks on a canvas to spark ideas. One artist described needing to physically work on a drawing for their imagination to "become visually manifest." In contrast, artists with vivid imagery were more likely to "pre-configure" or compose the entire artwork in their minds before starting the physical work.

What This Might Mean

This suggests that there is no single "correct" way to be creative. While art history often celebrates the "genius" who sees a perfect vision in their mind, this study shows that creativity can also be an interactive process between the artist and their materials. It implies that a lack of mental imagery is not a barrier to becoming a professional artist; it simply leads to different, more hands-on methods of discovery.

One Interesting Detail

One aphantasic artist described their process as "blind" collage-making, where they applied materials without a plan and only recognized what the image was—such as a depiction of "distressing events"—after it began to emerge physically on the page.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain errors. Always refer to the original paper for accuracy.
Most-Cited Researchers
Top 10 researchers by number of papers published in Aphantasia
1

Joel Pearson

35
2

Merlin Monzel

30
3

Adam Zeman

20
4

Rebecca Keogh

17
5

Martin Reuter

16
6

Juha Silvanto

14
7

Paolo Bartolomeo

11
8

Carla Dance

10
9

Jianghao Liu

9
10

Fraser Milton

9
Recruit the largest aphantasia cohort on earth

97.4K+ users & subscribers across the imagery spectrum, plus 1.5M+ survey responses in our dataset. Skip the recruitment bottleneck and run your study with the community we've built for a decade.

Partner with us