Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Ask AI About This Paper
Ask AI About This Paper

No increase in corticospinal excitability during motor simulation provides a platform to explore the neurophysiology of aphantasia

DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae084
Tags:
Theory & Definitions
Esselaar, M., Holmes, P. S., Scott, M. W., & Wright, D. J. (2024). No increase in corticospinal excitability during motor simulation provides a platform to explore the neurophysiology of aphantasia. Brain Communications, 6(2). doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcae084

Abstract

This scientific commentary refers to ‘Explicit and implicit motor simulations are impaired in individuals with aphantasia’, by Dupont et al. (https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcae072) in Brain Communications

Authors

  • Maaike Esselaar3
  • Paul S Holmes3
  • Matthew W. Scott3
  • David J. Wright3

No increase in corticospinal excitability during motor simulation provides a platform to explore the neurophysiology of aphantasia

DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae084
Tags:
Theory & Definitions
Esselaar, M., Holmes, P. S., Scott, M. W., & Wright, D. J. (2024). No increase in corticospinal excitability during motor simulation provides a platform to explore the neurophysiology of aphantasia. Brain Communications, 6(2). doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcae084

Abstract

This scientific commentary refers to ‘Explicit and implicit motor simulations are impaired in individuals with aphantasia’, by Dupont et al. (https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcae072) in Brain Communications

Authors

  • Maaike Esselaar3
  • Paul S Holmes3
  • Matthew W. Scott3
  • David J. Wright3
Aphantasia Logo

What This Study Is About

This scientific commentary discusses a breakthrough study that used brain stimulation to see if people with aphantasia—the inability to create mental images—also have trouble "simulating" physical movements in their minds. It explores whether aphantasia is more than just a lack of visual "pictures" and actually involves a deeper difference in how the brain prepares for action.

How They Studied It

The researchers reviewed a study where participants with either typical imagery or aphantasia performed three tasks: imagining a "pinch" movement (kinaesthetic imagery), watching a video of a pinch (action observation), and visual imagery. Researchers used Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)—a non-invasive tool that uses magnetic pulses to stimulate the brain—to measure "corticospinal excitability." This is essentially a measure of how "ready" the brain's motor system is to move.

What They Found

In people with typical imagery, simply imagining a movement or watching someone else do it caused their motor system to "rev up" and become more excitable. However, in people with aphantasia, this response was missing. Their brains did not show increased readiness during these mental tasks. This suggests that for those with aphantasia, the brain may struggle to simulate the physical sensation of moving, not just the visual image of it.

What This Might Mean

These findings suggest that aphantasia is not just a "failure of will" or a lack of awareness, but is tied to specific biological differences in how the brain processes simulations. It indicates that aphantasia might be a "multi-sensory" condition that affects how people imagine touch and movement. However, the commentary notes that future studies should test more people and adjust the timing of the brain pulses to confirm these results.

One Interesting Detail

While aphantasia is often defined by a lack of visual imagery, research suggests it is quite diverse: about 24% of people with aphantasia report a total absence of all mental senses (including sound, touch, and smell), while others may only lack visual "pictures."
This summary was generated by AI and may contain errors. Always refer to the original paper for accuracy.
Most-Cited Researchers
Top 10 researchers by number of papers published in Aphantasia
1

Joel Pearson

35
2

Merlin Monzel

30
3

Adam Zeman

20
4

Rebecca Keogh

17
5

Martin Reuter

16
6

Juha Silvanto

14
7

Paolo Bartolomeo

11
8

Carla Dance

10
9

Jianghao Liu

9
10

Fraser Milton

9
Recruit the largest aphantasia cohort on earth

97.4K+ users & subscribers across the imagery spectrum, plus 1.5M+ survey responses in our dataset. Skip the recruitment bottleneck and run your study with the community we've built for a decade.

Partner with us