Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Ask AI About This Paper
Ask AI About This Paper

Failures to Imagine

DOI: 10.1177/0276236616679963
Tags:
Measurement & Assessment
Maxwell, R., Lynn, S. J., & Lilienfeld, S. (2017). Failures to imagine. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 36(3), 270–300. doi:10.1177/0276236616679963

Abstract

Although interest in the relationship between mental imagery and psychopathology has increased greatly over the last decade, few publications to date have examined relationships between personality-related psychopathology and mental imagery use, abilities, or both. However, we have reason to expect that substantive relationships may exist. For example, studies have consistently linked psychopathy and borderline personality disorder to problems in emotion experience and emotion regulation, and a growing number of studies indicate that deficits in visual mental imagery use and ability in particular may contribute to such problems. Using correlational data from multiple self-report measures of normal and pathological personality functioning and visual mental imagery, our study presents preliminary evidence for lower levels of self-reported visual mental imagery use, abilities, or both among noncriminal individuals with higher levels of self-reported psychopathy and individuals with greater emotional regulation difficulties, a core feature of borderline personality disorder. We also found significant relationships among self-reported visual mental imagery use, ability, or both, and personality variables shown to strongly predict psychopathy and emotional regulation difficulties. Limitations of the study, especially its reliance on a correlational, cross-sectional design, are discussed, and implications for future research are explored.

Authors

  • Reed Maxwell1
  • Steven Jay Lynn1
  • Scott Lilienfeld1

Failures to Imagine

DOI: 10.1177/0276236616679963
Tags:
Measurement & Assessment
Maxwell, R., Lynn, S. J., & Lilienfeld, S. (2017). Failures to imagine. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 36(3), 270–300. doi:10.1177/0276236616679963

Abstract

Although interest in the relationship between mental imagery and psychopathology has increased greatly over the last decade, few publications to date have examined relationships between personality-related psychopathology and mental imagery use, abilities, or both. However, we have reason to expect that substantive relationships may exist. For example, studies have consistently linked psychopathy and borderline personality disorder to problems in emotion experience and emotion regulation, and a growing number of studies indicate that deficits in visual mental imagery use and ability in particular may contribute to such problems. Using correlational data from multiple self-report measures of normal and pathological personality functioning and visual mental imagery, our study presents preliminary evidence for lower levels of self-reported visual mental imagery use, abilities, or both among noncriminal individuals with higher levels of self-reported psychopathy and individuals with greater emotional regulation difficulties, a core feature of borderline personality disorder. We also found significant relationships among self-reported visual mental imagery use, ability, or both, and personality variables shown to strongly predict psychopathy and emotional regulation difficulties. Limitations of the study, especially its reliance on a correlational, cross-sectional design, are discussed, and implications for future research are explored.

Authors

  • Reed Maxwell1
  • Steven Jay Lynn1
  • Scott Lilienfeld1
Aphantasia Logo

What This Study Is About

This study explores how the ability to create mental images—picturing things in the "mind's eye"—relates to personality traits, specifically those linked to psychopathy and emotional regulation. The researchers wanted to see if people who experience more vivid mental imagery also report different levels of empathy or certain impulsive behaviors.

How They Studied It

The researchers surveyed 445 undergraduate students using several detailed questionnaires. Participants rated the vividness of their mental imagery (how clearly they can "see" or "hear" things in their minds) and answered questions about their personality. These included tests for psychopathic traits—such as "fearless dominance" (boldness and stress immunity) and "self-centered impulsivity"—as well as their ability to manage emotions and feel empathy for others.

What They Found

The study found that people with more vivid mental imagery tended to report higher levels of certain psychopathic traits, particularly those related to being bold and socially influential. However, vivid imagery was also linked to better emotional processing in some areas. Interestingly, the researchers found that "coldheartedness" (a lack of emotion or empathy) was generally associated with less vivid mental imagery. This suggests that the "internal theater" of the mind might play a role in how we experience and react to emotions.

What This Might Mean

These findings suggest that mental imagery is not just a neutral "extra" in our minds; it may be deeply connected to our personality and how we navigate social worlds. For those with aphantasia (the inability to visualize), this research hints that their emotional lives or social styles might be organized differently because they don't use mental "simulations" in the same way. However, because this study looked at college students rather than a clinical group, more research is needed to see if these patterns hold true for everyone.

One Interesting Detail

The researchers noted that mental imagery is often described as "weak perception" because it uses many of the same brain circuits as actually seeing or hearing something in the real world.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain errors. Always refer to the original paper for accuracy.
Most-Cited Researchers
Top 10 researchers by number of papers published in Aphantasia
1

Joel Pearson

35
2

Merlin Monzel

30
3

Adam Zeman

20
4

Rebecca Keogh

17
5

Martin Reuter

16
6

Juha Silvanto

14
7

Paolo Bartolomeo

11
8

Carla Dance

10
9

Jianghao Liu

9
10

Fraser Milton

9
Recruit the largest aphantasia cohort on earth

97.7K+ users & subscribers across the imagery spectrum, plus 1.5M+ survey responses in our dataset. Skip the recruitment bottleneck and run your study with the community we've built for a decade.

Partner with us