Back to all research

The Nature, Measurement, and Development of Imagery Ability

DOI: 10.1177/0276236617752439
Cumming, J., & Eaves, D. L. (2018). The nature, measurement, and development of imagery ability. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 37(4), 375–393. doi:DOI: 10.1177/0276236617752439

Abstract

This introduction to a special issue of Imagination, Cognition and Personality discusses how imagery ability is conceptualized, measured, and developed within sport and exercise sciences. Drawing from the model of imagery ability in sport, exercise, and dance, we explain that imagery ability is best understood not as a single undifferentiated general ability but as a complex multiprocess, multisensory, and multidimensional set of capacities. We argue that a more nuanced way of understanding imagery ability and its subcomponents should guide the development and selection of appropriate measurement tools and training methods. Finally, we introduce the four articles that make up this special issue on imagery ability, which collectively present a range of approaches for progressing this area of research further.

Authors

  • Jennifer Cumming1
  • Daniel L. Eaves1

Understanding Imagery Ability in Sports and Exercise

Overview/Introduction

Imagery ability is a crucial mental skill in sports and exercise, often used by athletes to enhance performance. This research explores how imagery ability is not a single skill but a complex, multi-faceted capacity involving various processes and senses. By understanding these complexities, we can better measure and develop imagery skills in athletes, leading to improved training methods and outcomes.

Methodology

The research draws on the Model of Imagery Ability in Sport, Exercise, and Dance (MIASED), which breaks down imagery ability into multiple processes and dimensions. The study emphasizes the need for both subjective and objective measurement tools to capture the full scope of imagery ability. Researchers also highlight the importance of considering various factors that influence imagery ability, such as sleep quality and physical activity levels.

Key Findings

  • Imagery Ability as a Complex Skill: Imagery ability involves multiple processes, such as image generation, inspection, and transformation. These processes can vary widely among individuals and situations.
  • Measurement Challenges: Measuring imagery ability is difficult because it is an internal process. Both subjective self-reports and objective tools like MiScreen are used to assess imagery skills.
  • Influence of External Factors: Factors like sleep and physical activity can significantly impact imagery ability, suggesting that a personalized approach to imagery training is necessary.
  • Innovative Tools: New tools like MiScreen have been developed to objectively assess imagery ability, providing a more reliable measure than self-reports alone.

Implications

Understanding the complex nature of imagery ability can lead to more effective training programs for athletes. By considering individual differences and external factors, trainers can tailor programs to enhance specific imagery skills, potentially leading to better performance outcomes. This research encourages a shift from viewing imagery ability as a single skill to recognizing its multifaceted nature.

Limitations

While the study provides valuable insights, it also highlights the need for further research to map existing measurement approaches and explore under-researched areas. The complexity of imagery ability means that more nuanced tools and methods are required to fully understand and develop this skill.
In conclusion, this research underscores the importance of a detailed and sophisticated understanding of imagery ability in sports and exercise. By embracing its complexity, we can develop more effective measurement tools and training methods, ultimately enhancing athletic performance.