No increased prevalence of prosopagnosia in aphantasia: Visual recognition deficits are small and not restricted to faces
Monzel and colleaguesAugust 2023
Abstract
Aphantasia and prosopagnosia are both rare conditions with impairments in visual cognition. While prosopagnosia refers to a face recognition deficit, aphantasics exhibit a lack of mental imagery. Current object recognition theories propose an interplay of perception and mental representations, making an association between recognition performance and visual imagery plausible. While the literature assumes a link between aphantasia and prosopagnosia, other impairments in aphantasia have been shown to be rather global. Therefore, we assumed that aphantasics do not solely exhibit impairments in face recognition but rather in general visual recognition performance, probably moderated by stimulus complexity. To test this hypothesis, 65 aphantasics were compared to 55 controls in a face recognition task, the Cambridge Face Memory Test, and a corresponding object recognition task, the Cambridge Car Memory Test. In both tasks, aphantasics performed worse than controls, indicating mild recognition deficits without face-specificity. Additional correlations between imagery vividness and performance in both tasks were found, suggesting that visual imagery influences visual recognition not only in imagery extremes. Stimulus complexity produced the expected moderation effect but only for the whole imagery-spectrum and only with face stimuli. Overall, the results imply that aphantasia is linked to a general but mild deficit in visual recognition.
Our summary in plain words
What This Study Is About
How They Studied It
- 65 people with aphantasia and 55 controls took part online. Another 16 people with in-between imagery scores were included only when looking across the whole imagery range.
- Imagery was measured with the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire (VVIQ). Aphantasia meant a score of 23 or less, and controls scored above 32.
- Face memory was tested with the Cambridge Face Memory Test, widely used to diagnose prosopagnosia. People studied faces, then picked each out of three choices: in the same photos, in new views, and in new views with visual noise.
- A matched test, the Cambridge Car Memory Test, did the same with cars.
What They Found
What This Might Mean
One Interesting Detail
This summary was written with AI and may contain errors. Check the original paper.
Authors
Merlin Monzel
Department of Psychology, Personality Psychology and Biological Psychology, University of Bonn, Kaiser-Karl-Ring 9, 53111 Bonn, Germany; Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4SB, UK
31 papers in the libraryAnnabel Vetterlein
Department of Psychology University of Bonn Germany
4 papers in the librarySvea A. Hogeterp
2 papers in the libraryMartin Reuter
Department of Psychology University of Bonn Germany; Center for Economics and Neuroscience (CENs) Laboratory of Neurogenetics University of Bonn Germany
16 papers in the library
Cite this paper
Monzel, M., Vetterlein, A., Hogeterp, S. A., & Reuter, M. (2023). No increased prevalence of prosopagnosia in aphantasia: visual recognition deficits are small and not restricted to faces. Perception, 52(9), 629–644. doi:10.1177/03010066231180712
Topics
Most-cited researchers
Recruit participants for your study
We can help you reach people across the imagery spectrum, from aphantasia to hyperphantasia.
Partner with usImage-Free Insights
A short note from our founder, Tom Ebeyer, every other week, plus occasional news and invitations to take part in studies. Change what you get from any email.