Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Back to all research
Ask AI About This Paper

Evaluating the Mind’s Eye: The Metacognition of Visual Imagery

DOI: 10.1177/0956797611417134
Tags:
HyperphantasiaHypophantasiaPhantasia
2 more
Pearson, J., Rademaker, R. L., & Tong, F. (2011). Evaluating the mind’s eye. Psychological Science, 22(12), 1535–1542. doi:DOI: 10.1177/0956797611417134

Abstract

Can people evaluate phenomenal qualities of internally generated experiences, such as whether a mental image is vivid or detailed? This question exemplifies a problem of metacognition: How well do people know their own thoughts? In the study reported here, participants were instructed to imagine a specific visual pattern and rate its vividness, after which they were presented with an ambiguous rivalry display that consisted of the previously imagined pattern plus an orthogonal pattern. On individual trials, higher ratings of vividness predicted a greater likelihood that the imagined pattern would appear dominant when the participant was subsequently presented with the binocular rivalry display. Off-line self-report questionnaires measuring imagery vividness also predicted individual differences in the strength of imagery bias over the entire study. Perceptual bias due to mental imagery could not be attributed to demand characteristics, as no bias was observed on catch-trial presentations of mock rivalry displays. Our findings provide novel evidence that people have a good metacognitive understanding of their own mental imagery and can reliably evaluate the vividness of single episodes of imagination.

Authors

  • Joel Pearson30
  • Rosanne L. Rademaker1
  • Frank Tong2

What This Study Is About

Researchers wanted to know: can we actually trust ourselves when we say a mental image is "clear" or "blurry"? They looked at whether people have good metacognition—which is basically a "brain-GPS" that tells you how accurately you are perceiving your own thoughts.

How They Studied It

The researchers worked with 20 university students. To test them, they used a cool trick called binocular rivalry.
Imagine your brain is watching a tug-of-war: if your left eye sees a green pattern and your right eye sees a red one, your brain can’t show both clearly, so it flips between them. The researchers discovered that if you imagine the green pattern first, your brain is more likely to "pick" green when the real images appear.
Participants were asked to:
1. Imagine a specific pattern (like green stripes).
2. Rate how vivid it was (how clear the "mental movie" looked) and how much effort they used.
3. Look at the real flickering images and report which one they saw first.

What They Found

The study found that our "inner scale" is surprisingly accurate! When participants rated a mental image as "highly vivid," that image almost always won the tug-of-war in their actual vision.
Key results included:
  • Vividness matters: If someone felt their mental image was a "4 out of 4" for clarity, it had a much stronger impact on their actual sight than a "1 out of 4."
  • Effort doesn't count: Interestingly, just *trying* hard to imagine something didn't change what they saw. Only the actual clarity of the image mattered.
  • Questionnaires work: People who scored high on standard imagery surveys (like the VVIQ) also showed the strongest effects in the lab.

What This Might Mean

This suggests that when we describe our mental imagery (the ability to picture things in our minds), we aren't just making it up! Our subjective ratings match up with how our brains process physical light.
For the aphantasia community—people who have a "blind mind's eye" and cannot visualize at all—this is a big deal. It suggests that when an aphantasic person says "I see nothing," their internal rating is likely a highly accurate reflection of their brain's reality. However, since this study only had 20 people, we need much larger groups to see if these rules apply to everyone.

One Interesting Detail

The researchers found that imagining something is so powerful it can literally "prime" your visual system, acting like a ghost image that biases what you see in the real world moments later!
This summary was generated by AI and may contain errors. Always refer to the original paper for accuracy.