Mental Imagery and Visual Working Memory

Keogh and PearsonDecember 2011

Abstract
What This Study Is About
How They Studied It
What They Found
What This Might Mean
One Interesting Detail
Authors
Cite this paper

Abstract

Visual working memory provides an essential link between past and future events. Despite recent efforts, capacity limits, their genesis and the underlying neural structures of visual working memory remain unclear. Here we show that performance in visual working memory - but not iconic visual memory - can be predicted by the strength of mental imagery as assessed with binocular rivalry in a given individual. In addition, for individuals with strong imagery, modulating the background luminance diminished performance on visual working memory and imagery tasks, but not working memory for number strings. This suggests that luminance signals were disrupting sensory-based imagery mechanisms and not a general working memory system. Individuals with poor imagery still performed above chance in the visual working memory task, but their performance was not affected by the background luminance, suggesting a dichotomy in strategies for visual working memory: individuals with strong mental imagery rely on sensory-based imagery to support mnemonic performance, while those with poor imagery rely on different strategies. These findings could help reconcile current controversy regarding the mechanism and location of visual mnemonic storage.

Our summary in plain words

What This Study Is About

Researchers investigated whether mental imagery—the ability to picture things in your mind—is the same thing as visual working memory, which is the ability to briefly hold and manipulate visual information. They wanted to see if people with stronger mental images are naturally better at memory tasks that involve pictures.

How They Studied It

The study involved 35 university students who completed several tasks. To measure the strength of their mental imagery objectively, researchers used a "binocular rivalry" test, where different images are shown to each eye and the brain must choose one to see; imagining one of the images beforehand can influence which one the brain picks. Participants also performed visual working memory tasks (remembering the orientation of patterns) and "iconic memory" tasks (remembering very brief flashes of images). In a second experiment with 17 students, researchers used bright background lights to see if "cluttering" the visual system would specifically hurt the memory of people with strong imagery.

What They Found

The researchers discovered that people with stronger mental imagery were significantly better at visual working memory tasks. However, imagery strength had no connection to iconic memory (the very short-term "afterimage" memory). Most importantly, when researchers added background light to interfere with the brain's visual processing, it only lowered the memory scores of people with strong imagery. People with weak imagery (similar to aphantasia) were not affected by the light, and they still performed well on the memory tests.

What This Might Mean

This suggests that there isn't just one way to remember a picture. People with strong mental imagery seem to use their "mind's eye" as a tool to help them remember. People with weak imagery or aphantasia likely use different, non-visual strategies to store the same information. This helps explain why someone might not be able to "see" a memory but can still remember the details of what they saw.

One Interesting Detail

The study found that while background light disrupted the visual memory of "strong imagers," it did not affect their ability to remember strings of numbers. This proves the light was specifically interfering with their mental "pictures," not their general ability to focus or remember things.

This summary was written with AI and may contain errors. Check the original paper.

Authors

Rebecca Keogh
17 papers in the library
Joel Pearson
35 papers in the library

Cite this paper

Keogh, R., & Pearson, J. (2011). Mental imagery and visual working memory. PLoS ONE, 6(12), e29221. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0029221

Topics

Measurement & Assessment

Most-cited researchers

Recruit participants for your study

We can help you reach people across the imagery spectrum, from aphantasia to hyperphantasia.

Partner with us

Image-Free Insights

A short note from our founder, Tom Ebeyer, every other week, plus occasional news and invitations to take part in studies. Change what you get from any email.

Research PLoS ONE

Mental Imagery and Visual Working Memory

Keogh and PearsonDecember 2011

Read the paper

Abstract
What This Study Is About
How They Studied It
What They Found
What This Might Mean
One Interesting Detail
Authors
Cite this paper

Abstract

Our summary in plain words

What This Study Is About

How They Studied It

What They Found

What This Might Mean

One Interesting Detail

This summary was written with AI and may contain errors. Check the original paper.

Authors

Rebecca Keogh
17 papers in the library
Joel Pearson
35 papers in the library

Cite this paper

Keogh, R., & Pearson, J. (2011). Mental imagery and visual working memory. PLoS ONE, 6(12), e29221. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0029221

Topics

Measurement & Assessment

Most-cited researchers

Recruit participants for your study

We can help you reach people across the imagery spectrum, from aphantasia to hyperphantasia.

Partner with us

More research

All research

2026

Imaginary Presence—Merleau-Ponty and Mental Imagery

Deery · Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences

This philosophy paper asks how Merleau-Ponty's ideas would explain the perception-like feel of mental images. It argues that neither the view of images as perceptual representations nor the view of them as simulations explains that feel, and proposes instead that imagining something means partly taking up the bodily stance one would have if it were really there, bringing a vague sense of how it could look. In a footnote, the author suggests that people with aphantasia keep this capacity for perception but cannot use it on purpose to make absent things appear, while calling aphantasia beyond the paper's scope.

2026

Imagery in affective and neurodevelopmental conditions: an insula-based interoceptive framework

Kvamme, Nagai and Silvanto · Trends Open

In this opinion article, the authors propose that the brain's processing of body signals, centered on the anterior insula, is a shared source of both mental imagery and emotion. On this view, conditions such as depression, anxiety, PTSD, autism and ADHD change imagery because they disturb this same system, and body-focused treatments might help restore imagery. The authors say the causal direction has not yet been shown and call for long-term and treatment studies to test it.

2026

Seeing without eyes: Relation between visual mental imagery and visual hallucinations

Panigutti and colleagues · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

This systematic review found only 11 studies on imagery and hallucinations in Parkinson's, Alzheimer's and schizophrenia, and none in Lewy body dementia. Seven reported a link and four did not, so the evidence is indecisive.

Image-Free Insights

A short note from our founder, Tom Ebeyer, every other week, plus occasional news and invitations to take part in studies. Change what you get from any email.