Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Ask AI About This Paper
Ask AI About This Paper

An international estimate of the prevalence of differing visual imagery abilities

DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1454107
Tags:
HyperphantasiaPhantasia
Wright, D. J., Scott, M. W., Kraeutner, S. N., Barhoun, P., Bertollo, M., Campbell, M. J., Waltzing, B. M., Dahm, S. F., Esselaar, M., Frank, C., Hardwick, R. M., Fuelscher, I., Marshall, B., Hodges, N. J., Hyde, C., & Holmes, P. S. (2024). An international estimate of the prevalence of differing visual imagery abilities. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1454107

Abstract

The aim of this research was to establish prevalence estimates for aphantasia, hypophantasia, typical imagery ability, and hyperphantasia in a large multi-national cohort. In Study 1, the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire was completed by 3,049 participants. Results indicated prevalence estimates of 1.2% for aphantasia, 3% for hypophantasia, 89.9% for typical imagery ability, and 5.9% for hyperphantasia. In Study 2, to replicate these findings in a larger sample, the Study 1 data were combined with openly available data from previous prevalence studies to create a total sample of 9,063 participants. Re-analysis of this data confirmed prevalence estimates of 0.9% for aphantasia, 3.3% for hypophantasia, 89.7% for typical imagery ability, and 6.1% for hyperphantasia. These robust and up-to-date estimates provide enhanced clarity to researchers regarding the prevalence of differing visual imagery abilities and provide a platform for future studies exploring the role of visual imagery in various cognitive and behavioral tasks.

Authors

  • David J. Wright3
  • Matthew W. Scott3
  • Sarah N. Kraeutner1
  • Pamela Barhoun1
  • Maurizio Bertollo1
  • Mark J. Campbell1
  • Baptiste M. Waltzing1
  • Stephan F. Dahm1
  • Maaike Esselaar3
  • Cornelia Frank1
  • Robert M. Hardwick1
  • Ian Fuelscher1
  • Ben Marshall1
  • Nicola J. Hodges1
  • Christian Hyde1
  • Paul S Holmes3

An international estimate of the prevalence of differing visual imagery abilities

DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1454107
Tags:
HyperphantasiaPhantasia
Wright, D. J., Scott, M. W., Kraeutner, S. N., Barhoun, P., Bertollo, M., Campbell, M. J., Waltzing, B. M., Dahm, S. F., Esselaar, M., Frank, C., Hardwick, R. M., Fuelscher, I., Marshall, B., Hodges, N. J., Hyde, C., & Holmes, P. S. (2024). An international estimate of the prevalence of differing visual imagery abilities. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1454107

Abstract

The aim of this research was to establish prevalence estimates for aphantasia, hypophantasia, typical imagery ability, and hyperphantasia in a large multi-national cohort. In Study 1, the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire was completed by 3,049 participants. Results indicated prevalence estimates of 1.2% for aphantasia, 3% for hypophantasia, 89.9% for typical imagery ability, and 5.9% for hyperphantasia. In Study 2, to replicate these findings in a larger sample, the Study 1 data were combined with openly available data from previous prevalence studies to create a total sample of 9,063 participants. Re-analysis of this data confirmed prevalence estimates of 0.9% for aphantasia, 3.3% for hypophantasia, 89.7% for typical imagery ability, and 6.1% for hyperphantasia. These robust and up-to-date estimates provide enhanced clarity to researchers regarding the prevalence of differing visual imagery abilities and provide a platform for future studies exploring the role of visual imagery in various cognitive and behavioral tasks.

Authors

  • David J. Wright3
  • Matthew W. Scott3
  • Sarah N. Kraeutner1
  • Pamela Barhoun1
  • Maurizio Bertollo1
  • Mark J. Campbell1
  • Baptiste M. Waltzing1
  • Stephan F. Dahm1
  • Maaike Esselaar3
  • Cornelia Frank1
  • Robert M. Hardwick1
  • Ian Fuelscher1
  • Ben Marshall1
  • Nicola J. Hodges1
  • Christian Hyde1
  • Paul S Holmes3
Aphantasia Logo

What This Study Is About

This study aimed to find out how common different levels of mental imagery are in the general population. Researchers wanted to provide a more accurate estimate of how many people have aphantasia (no mental "eye"), hypophantasia (very dim imagery), and hyperphantasia (imagery as vivid as real seeing).

How They Studied It

The researchers conducted two large-scale studies. In the first, over 3,000 people from various countries completed the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire (VVIQ), which asks people to rate how clearly they can picture specific scenes in their minds. In the second study, they combined their data with previous research to create a massive group of 9,063 participants. This allowed them to calculate more reliable percentages for each imagery type.

What They Found

The study revealed that most people (about 90%) have "typical" mental imagery. However, they found that:
  • Aphantasia (no mental imagery) affects about 0.9% of people.
  • Hypophantasia (very weak imagery) affects about 3.3% of people.
  • Hyperphantasia (extremely vivid imagery) is more common than aphantasia, affecting about 6.1% of people.
Combined, about 1 in 25 people (4.2%) struggle to create mental images, while about 1 in 16 people experience imagery that is as clear as actual vision.

What This Might Mean

These findings suggest that while aphantasia is relatively rare, it is a consistent part of human diversity. Knowing these numbers helps researchers understand how many people might not benefit from traditional therapies or learning techniques that rely heavily on "picturing" things. However, because these results are based on self-reported surveys, they rely on how people describe their own internal experiences, which can be subjective.

One Interesting Detail

The researchers found that hyperphantasia—having a "photographic" mental eye—is actually more than six times more common than having no mental imagery at all.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain errors. Always refer to the original paper for accuracy.
Most-Cited Researchers
Top 10 researchers by number of papers published in Aphantasia
1

Joel Pearson

35
2

Merlin Monzel

30
3

Adam Zeman

20
4

Rebecca Keogh

17
5

Martin Reuter

16
6

Juha Silvanto

14
7

Paolo Bartolomeo

11
8

Carla Dance

10
9

Jianghao Liu

9
10

Fraser Milton

9
Recruit the largest aphantasia cohort on earth

97.4K+ users & subscribers across the imagery spectrum, plus 1.5M+ survey responses in our dataset. Skip the recruitment bottleneck and run your study with the community we've built for a decade.

Partner with us