Back to all research

Olfactory imagery: A review

DOI: 10.3758/bf03196369
Stevenson, R. J., & Case, T. I. (2005). Olfactory imagery: a review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(2), 244–264. doi:10.3758/bf03196369

Abstract

Olfaction's unique cognitive architecture, the apparently inconsistent evidence favoring imagery, and its difficulty of evocation have led some to conclude that there is no capacity for olfactory imagery. Using three streams of evidence, we examine the validity of this claim. First, self-reports of olfactory imagery can resemble those obtained for actual perception. Second, imagining an odor can produce effects similar to actual perception. Third, olfactory perception and memory-based images can interact. A model of olfactory imagery is then presented that utilizes the same systems employed in actual perception, with similar constraints. This model is consistent with olfaction's unique information-processing capacities and can account for previous experimental inconsistencies on the basis of difficulty of evocation, a consequence of unstable access to semantic information. In sum, the evidence presented here is favorable to the existence of an olfactory imagery capacity.

Authors

  • Richard J. Stevenson1
  • Trevor I. Case1

Understanding Olfactory Imagery: Can We Imagine Smells?

Overview/Introduction

Have you ever wondered if you can imagine a smell, just like you can picture a scene or hear a tune in your mind? This intriguing question has puzzled scientists for years. Some believe that olfactory imagery, or the ability to imagine smells, doesn't exist due to the unique nature of our sense of smell and the challenges in evoking such imagery. However, recent research suggests otherwise. This study explores the capacity for olfactory imagery through various evidence streams, offering a fresh perspective on how we process smells in our minds.

Methodology

The researchers used three main approaches to investigate olfactory imagery:
  • Self-Reports: Participants described their experiences of imagining smells, comparing them to actual perceptions.
  • Imagined vs. Actual Perception: The study examined whether imagining a smell could produce effects similar to actually smelling it.
  • Interaction of Perception and Memory: The research explored how real and memory-based olfactory images interact.
These methods aimed to determine if olfactory imagery shares the same systems and constraints as actual smell perception.

Key Findings

  • Self-Reports: Participants' descriptions of imagined smells often mirrored those of real smells, suggesting a similarity in experience.
  • Imagined Effects: Imagining an odor could trigger similar effects to smelling it, indicating that olfactory imagery might be more than just a mental exercise.
  • Perception and Memory Interaction: Real and imagined smells can interact, supporting the idea that our brains process olfactory imagery similarly to actual smells.
The study proposes a model where olfactory imagery uses the same systems as real smell perception, explaining previous inconsistencies in research due to the difficulty of evoking smell imagery.

Implications

The findings have several practical implications:
  • Training and Therapy: Understanding olfactory imagery can enhance training for professions relying on smell, like perfumery or culinary arts. It could also aid therapies for conditions affecting smell perception.
  • Cognitive Science: This research enriches our understanding of sensory processing, highlighting the brain's ability to create vivid sensory experiences without direct stimuli.

Limitations

While the study provides compelling evidence for olfactory imagery, it acknowledges some limitations:
  • Difficulty of Evocation: Participants often struggle to evoke smell images, possibly due to the weak connection between language and olfaction.
  • Medical Conditions: Many studies involve individuals with medical conditions, which might not apply to healthy individuals.
In conclusion, this research challenges the notion that olfactory imagery is non-existent, suggesting that with the right conditions, we can indeed imagine smells as vividly as we do sights or sounds.