Hallucinations & Perception
Imagery and hallucination look related but aren't the same thing. This covers pseudo-hallucinations, the Ganzflicker effect, and where perception and imagination overlap.
Imagery and hallucination look related but aren't the same thing. This covers pseudo-hallucinations, the Ganzflicker effect, and where perception and imagination overlap.
Imagery and hallucination look related but aren't the same thing. This covers pseudo-hallucinations, the Ganzflicker effect, and where perception and imagination overlap.
Researchers found that higher vividness of mental imagery is often associated with an increased occurrence of visual hallucinations across several clinical conditions. This suggests that hyper-functioning visual associative areas may drive both phenomena.
Panigutti, M., Bechi Gabrielli, G., Conti, D., Accinni, T., Zazzaro, G., Di Vita, A., Guariglia, C., & D’Antonio, F. (2026). Seeing without eyes: relation between visual mental imagery and visual hallucinations. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 184, 106621. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2026.106621
Involuntary mental imagery is more frequent and vivid than hallucinations, though both share similar phenomenological traits. This suggests these inner experiences exist on a continuum rather than being entirely distinct phenomena.
Pepin, G., Lœvenbruck, H., Chauvin, A., Jacquet, C., Eichenlaub, J.-B., & Bortolon, C. (2026). Comparing the characteristics of hallucinations and mental imagery: a large cross-sectional study in the general population. Consciousness and Cognition, 137, 103974. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2025.103974
Analysis of Carl Jung's self-reports suggests his anomalous experiences stemmed from hyperphantasia rather than a psychotic disorder. This indicates that extremely vivid imagery can cross a reality threshold and be misidentified as psychosis.
Incekara, F., & Blom, J. D. (2024). Carl jung: a life on the edge of reality with hypnagogia, hyperphantasia, and hallucinations. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1358329

This apple illusion allows people who can't visualize to temporarily 'see' an image that isn't there—using visual perception to demonstrate what others experience through their imagination.
Researchers found that sensory input competes with mental imagery in a hierarchical neural network, preventing thoughts from dominating low-level sensory regions. This explains why mental imagery feels less vivid than real perception and how aphantasia arises from overweighted bottom-up signals.
Sulfaro, A. A., Robinson, A. K., & Carlson, T. A. (2023). Modelling perception as a hierarchical competition differentiates imagined, veridical, and hallucinated percepts. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 2023(1). doi:10.1093/nc/niad018
The brain distinguishes reality from imagination based on whether intermixed sensory signals cross a strength threshold. This suggests that sufficiently vivid mental imagery can become subjectively indistinguishable from actual perception.
Dijkstra, N., & Fleming, S. M. (2023). Subjective signal strength distinguishes reality from imagination. Nature Communications, 14(1). doi:10.1038/s41467-023-37322-1
People with aphantasia are significantly less likely to experience vivid or complex pseudo-hallucinations during rhythmic flicker stimulation. This suggests that the ability to generate voluntary mental imagery increases susceptibility to anomalous perceptual experiences.
Königsmark, V. T., Bergmann, J., & Reeder, R. R. (2021). The ganzflicker experience: high probability of seeing vivid and complex pseudo-hallucinations with imagery but not aphantasia. Cortex, 141, 522–534. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2021.05.007
Researchers found that higher visual imagery vividness correlates with increased pareidolia proneness in both static and dynamic noise. This suggests that vivid mental imagery can lead to more frequent misperceptions of reality.
Salge, J. H., Pollmann, S., & Reeder, R. R. (2021). Anomalous visual experience is linked to perceptual uncertainty and visual imagery vividness. Psychological Research, 85(5), 1848–1865. doi:10.1007/s00426-020-01364-7
Researchers propose a dichotomous framework for phantom perception, distinguishing between voluntary mental imagery and involuntary experiences like illusions or synesthesia. This classification helps unify diverse sensory phenomena and provides a roadmap for studying the neural mechanisms of constructive perception.
Pearson, J., & Westbrook, F. (2015). Phantom perception: voluntary and involuntary nonretinal vision. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(5), 278–284. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.03.004
You've reached the end of content in the hallucinations & perception topic.
Everything you wish someone had told you about having aphantasia. Understand why you think differently, find your strengths, and learn the strategies built for your brain — not someone else's.
Talk to counselors, coaches, and educators who already understand aphantasia — so you don't have to start by explaining what it is.
Researchers found that higher vividness of mental imagery is often associated with an increased occurrence of visual hallucinations across several clinical conditions. This suggests that hyper-functioning visual associative areas may drive both phenomena.
Panigutti, M., Bechi Gabrielli, G., Conti, D., Accinni, T., Zazzaro, G., Di Vita, A., Guariglia, C., & D’Antonio, F. (2026). Seeing without eyes: relation between visual mental imagery and visual hallucinations. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 184, 106621. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2026.106621
Involuntary mental imagery is more frequent and vivid than hallucinations, though both share similar phenomenological traits. This suggests these inner experiences exist on a continuum rather than being entirely distinct phenomena.
Pepin, G., Lœvenbruck, H., Chauvin, A., Jacquet, C., Eichenlaub, J.-B., & Bortolon, C. (2026). Comparing the characteristics of hallucinations and mental imagery: a large cross-sectional study in the general population. Consciousness and Cognition, 137, 103974. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2025.103974
Analysis of Carl Jung's self-reports suggests his anomalous experiences stemmed from hyperphantasia rather than a psychotic disorder. This indicates that extremely vivid imagery can cross a reality threshold and be misidentified as psychosis.
Incekara, F., & Blom, J. D. (2024). Carl jung: a life on the edge of reality with hypnagogia, hyperphantasia, and hallucinations. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1358329

This apple illusion allows people who can't visualize to temporarily 'see' an image that isn't there—using visual perception to demonstrate what others experience through their imagination.
Researchers found that sensory input competes with mental imagery in a hierarchical neural network, preventing thoughts from dominating low-level sensory regions. This explains why mental imagery feels less vivid than real perception and how aphantasia arises from overweighted bottom-up signals.
Sulfaro, A. A., Robinson, A. K., & Carlson, T. A. (2023). Modelling perception as a hierarchical competition differentiates imagined, veridical, and hallucinated percepts. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 2023(1). doi:10.1093/nc/niad018
The brain distinguishes reality from imagination based on whether intermixed sensory signals cross a strength threshold. This suggests that sufficiently vivid mental imagery can become subjectively indistinguishable from actual perception.
Dijkstra, N., & Fleming, S. M. (2023). Subjective signal strength distinguishes reality from imagination. Nature Communications, 14(1). doi:10.1038/s41467-023-37322-1
People with aphantasia are significantly less likely to experience vivid or complex pseudo-hallucinations during rhythmic flicker stimulation. This suggests that the ability to generate voluntary mental imagery increases susceptibility to anomalous perceptual experiences.
Königsmark, V. T., Bergmann, J., & Reeder, R. R. (2021). The ganzflicker experience: high probability of seeing vivid and complex pseudo-hallucinations with imagery but not aphantasia. Cortex, 141, 522–534. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2021.05.007
Researchers found that higher visual imagery vividness correlates with increased pareidolia proneness in both static and dynamic noise. This suggests that vivid mental imagery can lead to more frequent misperceptions of reality.
Salge, J. H., Pollmann, S., & Reeder, R. R. (2021). Anomalous visual experience is linked to perceptual uncertainty and visual imagery vividness. Psychological Research, 85(5), 1848–1865. doi:10.1007/s00426-020-01364-7
Researchers propose a dichotomous framework for phantom perception, distinguishing between voluntary mental imagery and involuntary experiences like illusions or synesthesia. This classification helps unify diverse sensory phenomena and provides a roadmap for studying the neural mechanisms of constructive perception.
Pearson, J., & Westbrook, F. (2015). Phantom perception: voluntary and involuntary nonretinal vision. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(5), 278–284. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.03.004
You've reached the end of content in the hallucinations & perception topic.
Everything you wish someone had told you about having aphantasia. Understand why you think differently, find your strengths, and learn the strategies built for your brain — not someone else's.
Talk to counselors, coaches, and educators who already understand aphantasia — so you don't have to start by explaining what it is.