Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Ask AI About This Paper
Ask AI About This Paper

How Interoception and the Insula Shape Mental Imagery and Aphantasia

DOI: 10.1007/s10548-025-01101-6
Tags:
Theory & Definitions
Silvanto, J., & Nagai, Y. (2025). How interoception and the insula shape mental imagery and aphantasia. Brain Topography, 38(2). doi:10.1007/s10548-025-01101-6

Abstract

A major question in cognitive neuroscience is understanding the neural basis of mental imagery, particularly in cases of its absence, known as aphantasia.

Authors

  • Juha Silvanto15
  • Yoko Nagai5

How Interoception and the Insula Shape Mental Imagery and Aphantasia

DOI: 10.1007/s10548-025-01101-6
Tags:
Theory & Definitions
Silvanto, J., & Nagai, Y. (2025). How interoception and the insula shape mental imagery and aphantasia. Brain Topography, 38(2). doi:10.1007/s10548-025-01101-6

Abstract

A major question in cognitive neuroscience is understanding the neural basis of mental imagery, particularly in cases of its absence, known as aphantasia.

Authors

  • Juha Silvanto15
  • Yoko Nagai5
Aphantasia Logo

What This Study Is About

This research explores whether aphantasia—the inability to visualize images in the mind—is more than just a "blind" inner eye. The authors propose that mental imagery is actually a combination of sensory information and "interoception," which is the brain's ability to sense and understand internal signals from the body, like a heartbeat or breathing.

How They Studied It

This paper is a theoretical review, meaning the researchers analyzed a wide range of existing studies rather than testing new participants. They looked at brain imaging data, psychological tests, and clinical reports involving people with aphantasia, as well as related conditions like alexithymia (difficulty identifying emotions) and dyspraxia (challenges with physical coordination). They specifically focused on how two brain regions—the insula and the anterior cingulate cortex—connect bodily sensations with mental thoughts.

What They Found

The researchers found that mental imagery is not just a picture; it is an "embodied" experience that uses signals from the body to feel real and personal. They discovered that aphantasia is frequently linked to differences in how the brain processes these internal body signals. For example, people with aphantasia often have higher rates of dyspraxia or alexithymia, both of which involve the brain struggling to integrate sensory information with bodily awareness. This suggests that aphantasia might be caused by the brain's inability to "anchor" mental images to physical sensations.

What This Might Mean

This suggests that aphantasia may reflect a broader difference in how the brain handles internal information, rather than just a specific "glitch" in the visual system. If mental imagery requires a connection between the mind and the body's signals, then aphantasia might be a result of these two systems not communicating effectively. While this theory helps explain why some people with aphantasia also struggle with autobiographical memory or emotion recognition, more direct experiments are needed to prove that the body's internal signals are the "missing link" for those who cannot visualize.

One Interesting Detail

The study points out that while people with aphantasia cannot voluntarily create mental images while awake, many still experience vivid dreams. The researchers suggest this is because dreaming is an automatic process, whereas voluntary imagery requires a "sense of agency"—the feeling that you are the one in control—which relies heavily on the brain's connection to the body.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain errors. Always refer to the original paper for accuracy.
Most-Cited Researchers
Top 10 researchers by number of papers published in Aphantasia
1

Joel Pearson

35
2

Merlin Monzel

31
3

Adam Zeman

20
4

Rebecca Keogh

17
5

Martin Reuter

16
6

Juha Silvanto

15
7

Paolo Bartolomeo

11
8

Carla Dance

10
9

Jianghao Liu

10
10

Fraser Milton

9
Recruit the largest aphantasia cohort on earth

97.8K+ users & subscribers across the imagery spectrum, plus 1.5M+ survey responses in our dataset. Skip the recruitment bottleneck and run your study with the community we've built for a decade.

Partner with us