Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Ask AI About This Paper
Ask AI About This Paper

Absence of shared representation in the visual cortex challenges unconscious imagery in aphantasia

DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2025.05.009
Tags:
Theory & DefinitionsHypophantasiaCognition
Scholz, C. O., Monzel, M., & Liu, J. (2025). Absence of shared representation in the visual cortex challenges unconscious imagery in aphantasia. Current Biology, 35(13), R645–R646. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2025.05.009

Abstract

Aphantasia is defined as the absence (or near-absence) of imagery experience, most commonly in but not necessarily limited to the visual modality. While the neural and cognitive underpinnings of aphantasia remain hotly debated (see Zeman1 for a recent review), a proposal that has recently gained attention is that people with aphantasia may have unconscious mental imagery2, meaning that despite lacking the experience associated with imagery, they may still possess the relevant neural activity. A recent article in Current Biology by Chang et al.3 reported finding ‘imageless imagery’ in aphantasic subjects, thus seemingly supporting this view. However, we argue here that the representations found in aphantasic subjects by Chang et al.3, as well as in other studies (e.g., by Liu et al.4,5), should not be viewed as unconscious imagery because they fail to show the perception-like pattern usually associated with mental imagery.

Authors

  • Christian O. Scholz4
  • Merlin Monzel30
  • Jianghao Liu9

Absence of shared representation in the visual cortex challenges unconscious imagery in aphantasia

DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2025.05.009
Tags:
Theory & DefinitionsHypophantasiaCognition
Scholz, C. O., Monzel, M., & Liu, J. (2025). Absence of shared representation in the visual cortex challenges unconscious imagery in aphantasia. Current Biology, 35(13), R645–R646. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2025.05.009

Abstract

Aphantasia is defined as the absence (or near-absence) of imagery experience, most commonly in but not necessarily limited to the visual modality. While the neural and cognitive underpinnings of aphantasia remain hotly debated (see Zeman1 for a recent review), a proposal that has recently gained attention is that people with aphantasia may have unconscious mental imagery2, meaning that despite lacking the experience associated with imagery, they may still possess the relevant neural activity. A recent article in Current Biology by Chang et al.3 reported finding ‘imageless imagery’ in aphantasic subjects, thus seemingly supporting this view. However, we argue here that the representations found in aphantasic subjects by Chang et al.3, as well as in other studies (e.g., by Liu et al.4,5), should not be viewed as unconscious imagery because they fail to show the perception-like pattern usually associated with mental imagery.

Authors

  • Christian O. Scholz4
  • Merlin Monzel30
  • Jianghao Liu9
Aphantasia Logo

What This Study Is About

This study investigates whether people with aphantasia—the inability to create mental images—might still have "unconscious" mental imagery happening in their brains. The researchers looked at whether the brain activity of aphantasics during imagery tasks truly mimics the patterns seen during actual seeing (perception).

How They Studied It

The researchers analyzed data from previous neuroimaging studies that used fMRI (brain scans) to monitor the visual cortex—the part of the brain that processes what we see. They compared two groups: "typical imagers" (people who can see pictures in their mind) and "aphantasics." They specifically looked for three things: if the visual cortex was active, if that activity contained specific details about the object being imagined, and if those brain patterns matched the patterns created when the person was actually looking at the object.

What They Found

While people with aphantasia do show activity in their visual cortex when trying to imagine something, and that activity contains some specific details, it does not match the brain patterns used for real seeing. In typical imagers, the brain "recycles" the same patterns for both seeing and imagining. In aphantasics, these patterns are different. This suggests that even if there is activity in the visual brain, it isn't "unconscious imagery" because it doesn't look like the brain's version of a picture.

What This Might Mean

The findings suggest that aphantasia isn't just "blind" imagery; instead, people with aphantasia may use entirely different mental strategies to think about objects. Their brains might be processing information in a non-visual or more abstract way, even when using the visual parts of the brain. This challenges the idea that everyone’s brain tries to "picture" things the same way.

One Interesting Detail

The researchers found that in aphantasics, the brain activity during imagery tasks was often stronger on the same side of the brain as the object they were thinking about. This is the opposite of how normal vision works, where the left side of the brain handles the right side of your vision and vice versa.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain errors. Always refer to the original paper for accuracy.
Most-Cited Researchers
Top 10 researchers by number of papers published in Aphantasia
1

Joel Pearson

35
2

Merlin Monzel

30
3

Adam Zeman

20
4

Rebecca Keogh

17
5

Martin Reuter

16
6

Juha Silvanto

14
7

Paolo Bartolomeo

11
8

Carla Dance

10
9

Jianghao Liu

9
10

Fraser Milton

9
Recruit the largest aphantasia cohort on earth

97.7K+ users & subscribers across the imagery spectrum, plus 1.5M+ survey responses in our dataset. Skip the recruitment bottleneck and run your study with the community we've built for a decade.

Partner with us