Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Ask AI About This Paper
Ask AI About This Paper

The human imagination: the cognitive neuroscience of visual mental imagery

DOI: 10.1038/s41583-019-0202-9
Tags:
Theory & Definitions
Pearson, J. (2019). The human imagination: the cognitive neuroscience of visual mental imagery. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 20(10), 624–634. doi:10.1038/s41583-019-0202-9

Abstract

Mental imagery can be advantageous, unnecessary and even clinically disruptive. With methodological constraints now overcome, research has shown that visual imagery involves a network of brain areas from the frontal cortex to sensory areas, overlapping with the default mode network, and can function much like a weak version of afferent perception. Imagery vividness and strength range from completely absent (aphantasia) to photo-like (hyperphantasia). Both the anatomy and function of the primary visual cortex are related to visual imagery. The use of imagery as a tool has been linked to many compound cognitive processes and imagery plays both symptomatic and mechanistic roles in neurological and mental disorders and treatments. Mental imagery plays a role in a variety of cognitive processes such as memory recall. In this review, Joel Pearson discusses recent insights into the neural mechanisms that underlie visual imagery, how imagery can be objectively and reliably measured, and how it affects general cognition.

Authors

  • Joel Pearson35

The human imagination: the cognitive neuroscience of visual mental imagery

DOI: 10.1038/s41583-019-0202-9
Tags:
Theory & Definitions
Pearson, J. (2019). The human imagination: the cognitive neuroscience of visual mental imagery. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 20(10), 624–634. doi:10.1038/s41583-019-0202-9

Abstract

Mental imagery can be advantageous, unnecessary and even clinically disruptive. With methodological constraints now overcome, research has shown that visual imagery involves a network of brain areas from the frontal cortex to sensory areas, overlapping with the default mode network, and can function much like a weak version of afferent perception. Imagery vividness and strength range from completely absent (aphantasia) to photo-like (hyperphantasia). Both the anatomy and function of the primary visual cortex are related to visual imagery. The use of imagery as a tool has been linked to many compound cognitive processes and imagery plays both symptomatic and mechanistic roles in neurological and mental disorders and treatments. Mental imagery plays a role in a variety of cognitive processes such as memory recall. In this review, Joel Pearson discusses recent insights into the neural mechanisms that underlie visual imagery, how imagery can be objectively and reliably measured, and how it affects general cognition.

Authors

  • Joel Pearson35
Aphantasia Logo

What This Study Is About

This research review explores how the brain creates mental imagery—the ability to picture things in your mind—and why this ability varies so much between people. It specifically looks at the biological differences between those with aphantasia (no mental imagery) and hyperphantasia (extremely vivid, life-like imagery).

How They Studied It

The author reviewed decades of research, including brain imaging (fMRI) and behavioral tests. One key method discussed is "binocular rivalry," an objective test where different images are shown to each eye; what a person "sees" first can reveal the strength of their mental imagery without relying on self-reporting. The study compared brain structure and activity across thousands of participants from various previous experiments.

What They Found

Researchers discovered that the strength of a person's "mind's eye" is linked to the size and activity of the primary visual cortex (the part of the brain that processes sight). People with stronger mental imagery tend to have a smaller visual cortex and lower levels of "background noise" in their brain activity. In contrast, aphantasia may be linked to a larger visual cortex or higher levels of neural noise that "drown out" the internal signals needed to form an image.

What This Might Mean

This suggests that aphantasia isn't just a matter of imagination, but is rooted in the physical architecture of the brain. It indicates that mental imagery is a "top-down" process where higher brain areas send signals back to the visual centers. However, the study notes that even without mental images, people with aphantasia can often perform just as well on memory tasks by using different cognitive strategies, suggesting the brain has multiple ways to solve the same problem.

One Interesting Detail

The study highlights that while people with aphantasia cannot voluntarily picture a loved one's face, they may still experience involuntary imagery, such as flashes of images during dreams, suggesting the brain's "imaging hardware" might still be present but inaccessible to conscious control.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain errors. Always refer to the original paper for accuracy.
Most-Cited Researchers
Top 10 researchers by number of papers published in Aphantasia
1

Joel Pearson

35
2

Merlin Monzel

31
3

Adam Zeman

20
4

Rebecca Keogh

17
5

Martin Reuter

16
6

Juha Silvanto

15
7

Paolo Bartolomeo

11
8

Carla Dance

10
9

Jianghao Liu

10
10

Fraser Milton

9
Recruit the largest aphantasia cohort on earth

98.1K+ users & subscribers across the imagery spectrum, plus 1.5M+ survey responses in our dataset. Skip the recruitment bottleneck and run your study with the community we've built for a decade.

Partner with us