Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Ask AI About This Paper
Ask AI About This Paper

A Dual Coding View of Vocabulary Learning

DOI: 10.1080/10573560590949359
Tags:
Learning
Sadoski, M. (2005). A dual coding view of vocabulary learning. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 21(3), 221–238. doi:10.1080/10573560590949359

Abstract

A theoretical perspective on acquiring sight vocabulary and developing meaningful vocabulary is presented. Dual Coding Theory assumes that cognition occurs in two independent but connected codes: a verbal code for language and a nonverbal code for mental imagery. The mixed research literature on using pictures in teaching sight vocabulary is briefly reviewed, and a possible resolution suggested. The use of concrete, high-imagery words and both verbal and nonverbal contexts are found to be important factors in teaching sight vocabulary along with word decodability. Effective methods of teaching meaningful vocabulary that are consistent with Dual Coding Theory are briefly reviewed, including self-generated imagery, the use of illustrations, the keyword method, and verbal-associative methods. Results are relevant for both normal readers and those experiencing reading problems.

Authors

  • Mark Sadoski1

A Dual Coding View of Vocabulary Learning

DOI: 10.1080/10573560590949359
Tags:
Learning
Sadoski, M. (2005). A dual coding view of vocabulary learning. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 21(3), 221–238. doi:10.1080/10573560590949359

Abstract

A theoretical perspective on acquiring sight vocabulary and developing meaningful vocabulary is presented. Dual Coding Theory assumes that cognition occurs in two independent but connected codes: a verbal code for language and a nonverbal code for mental imagery. The mixed research literature on using pictures in teaching sight vocabulary is briefly reviewed, and a possible resolution suggested. The use of concrete, high-imagery words and both verbal and nonverbal contexts are found to be important factors in teaching sight vocabulary along with word decodability. Effective methods of teaching meaningful vocabulary that are consistent with Dual Coding Theory are briefly reviewed, including self-generated imagery, the use of illustrations, the keyword method, and verbal-associative methods. Results are relevant for both normal readers and those experiencing reading problems.

Authors

  • Mark Sadoski1
Aphantasia Logo

What This Study Is About

This paper explores why some ways of learning new words work better than others. It looks at how our brains use both language and mental imagery—the ability to picture things in your mind—to understand and remember vocabulary.

How They Studied It

The author reviewed decades of existing research on how people learn to read and remember words. Instead of conducting a new experiment with a specific group of participants, this study analyzed various teaching methods through the lens of "Dual Coding Theory." This theory suggests that our minds have two separate but connected systems: one for processing language and one for processing non-verbal information, like images and sensations.

What They Found

The research shows that concrete words (like "apple") are much easier to learn than abstract words (like "justice") because they can be stored in both the verbal and the imagery systems of the brain. When we learn a word using both systems—for example, by seeing a picture or creating a mental image while hearing the word—we create two different "memory traces." This makes the information much more likely to be remembered. The study also found that techniques like the "keyword method," where learners associate a new word with a familiar-sounding word and a mental image, are among the most effective ways to build a vocabulary.

What This Might Mean

This suggests that for many people, "seeing" a word in the mind is a powerful tool for learning. However, for people with aphantasia—the inability to create mental images—traditional imagery-based learning strategies might not work the same way. It highlights the importance of understanding that different brains may need different strategies; while imagery helps many, others might rely more on the verbal system or logical connections. The study also cautions that while pictures help, they can sometimes be distracting if they don't focus the learner's attention on the right details.

One Interesting Detail

The study explains that concrete language has a "natural advantage" over abstract language because it is much easier for the brain to "code" it into both words and pictures simultaneously.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain errors. Always refer to the original paper for accuracy.
Most-Cited Researchers
Top 10 researchers by number of papers published in Aphantasia
1

Joel Pearson

35
2

Merlin Monzel

30
3

Adam Zeman

20
4

Rebecca Keogh

17
5

Martin Reuter

16
6

Juha Silvanto

14
7

Paolo Bartolomeo

11
8

Carla Dance

10
9

Jianghao Liu

9
10

Fraser Milton

9
Recruit the largest aphantasia cohort on earth

97.4K+ users & subscribers across the imagery spectrum, plus 1.5M+ survey responses in our dataset. Skip the recruitment bottleneck and run your study with the community we've built for a decade.

Partner with us