Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Ask AI About This Paper
Ask AI About This Paper

Visual imagery vividness correlates with afterimage conscious perception

DOI: 10.1093/nc/niae032
Tags:
Neuroscience & Mechanisms
Kronemer, S. I., Holness, M., Morgan, A. T., Teves, J. B., Gonzalez-Castillo, J., Handwerker, D. A., & Bandettini, P. A. (2024). Visual imagery vividness correlates with afterimage conscious perception. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 2024(1). doi:10.1093/nc/niae032

Abstract

Afterimages are illusory, visual conscious perceptions. A widely accepted theory is that afterimages are caused by retinal signaling that continues after the physical disappearance of a light stimulus. However, afterimages have been reported without preceding visual, sensory stimulation (e.g. conditioned afterimages and afterimages induced by illusory vision). These observations suggest the role of top-down brain mechanisms in afterimage conscious perception. Therefore, some afterimages may share perceptual features with sensory-independent conscious perceptions (e.g. imagery, hallucinations, and dreams) that occur without bottom-up sensory input. In the current investigation, we tested for a link between the vividness of visual imagery and afterimage conscious perception. Participants reported their vividness of visual imagery and perceived sharpness, contrast, and duration of negative afterimages. The afterimage perceptual features were acquired using perception matching paradigms that were validated on image stimuli. Relating these perceptual reports revealed that the vividness of visual imagery positively correlated with afterimage contrast and sharpness. These behavioral results support shared neural mechanisms between visual imagery and afterimages. However, we cannot exclude alternative explanations, including demand characteristics and afterimage perception reporting inaccuracy. This study encourages future research combining neurophysiology recording methods and afterimage paradigms to directly examine the neural mechanisms of afterimage conscious perception.

Authors

  • Sharif I Kronemer1
  • Micah Holness1
  • A Tyler Morgan1
  • Joshua B Teves1
  • Javier Gonzalez-Castillo1
  • Daniel A Handwerker1
  • Peter A Bandettini1

Visual imagery vividness correlates with afterimage conscious perception

DOI: 10.1093/nc/niae032
Tags:
Neuroscience & Mechanisms
Kronemer, S. I., Holness, M., Morgan, A. T., Teves, J. B., Gonzalez-Castillo, J., Handwerker, D. A., & Bandettini, P. A. (2024). Visual imagery vividness correlates with afterimage conscious perception. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 2024(1). doi:10.1093/nc/niae032

Abstract

Afterimages are illusory, visual conscious perceptions. A widely accepted theory is that afterimages are caused by retinal signaling that continues after the physical disappearance of a light stimulus. However, afterimages have been reported without preceding visual, sensory stimulation (e.g. conditioned afterimages and afterimages induced by illusory vision). These observations suggest the role of top-down brain mechanisms in afterimage conscious perception. Therefore, some afterimages may share perceptual features with sensory-independent conscious perceptions (e.g. imagery, hallucinations, and dreams) that occur without bottom-up sensory input. In the current investigation, we tested for a link between the vividness of visual imagery and afterimage conscious perception. Participants reported their vividness of visual imagery and perceived sharpness, contrast, and duration of negative afterimages. The afterimage perceptual features were acquired using perception matching paradigms that were validated on image stimuli. Relating these perceptual reports revealed that the vividness of visual imagery positively correlated with afterimage contrast and sharpness. These behavioral results support shared neural mechanisms between visual imagery and afterimages. However, we cannot exclude alternative explanations, including demand characteristics and afterimage perception reporting inaccuracy. This study encourages future research combining neurophysiology recording methods and afterimage paradigms to directly examine the neural mechanisms of afterimage conscious perception.

Authors

  • Sharif I Kronemer1
  • Micah Holness1
  • A Tyler Morgan1
  • Joshua B Teves1
  • Javier Gonzalez-Castillo1
  • Daniel A Handwerker1
  • Peter A Bandettini1
Aphantasia Logo

What This Study Is About

Researchers investigated whether the strength of a person's mental imagery—the ability to picture things in the "mind's eye"—is linked to how they experience afterimages (the ghostly shapes that linger in your vision after looking at a bright object). The study aimed to see if these two experiences share the same brain mechanisms.

How They Studied It

The study involved 62 healthy adults who completed the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire (VVIQ), a standard test where people rate how clearly they can imagine scenes. To test afterimages, participants looked at a black silhouette of a face for four seconds. After the face disappeared, they saw a "negative afterimage" (a light-colored version of the face). Participants then used a computer program to adjust an on-screen image until it matched the sharpness, brightness (contrast), and duration of the afterimage they were seeing.

What They Found

The researchers discovered a clear link: people who reported more vivid mental imagery also experienced afterimages that were sharper and had higher contrast. Specifically, the correlation between imagery vividness and afterimage brightness was statistically strong. While most participants saw afterimages, the one participant in the study with aphantasia (the inability to form mental images) reported the blurriest afterimages of the entire group.

What This Might Mean

These findings suggest that afterimages aren't just caused by the eyes (the retina) getting "tired." Instead, they likely involve "top-down" brain processes—the same ones we use to create mental images. This means that how we imagine things and how we perceive these visual illusions might be two sides of the same coin. However, the researchers noted that they cannot yet rule out whether people with vivid imaginations are simply more sensitive to reporting what they see.

One Interesting Detail

While afterimages are usually studied using simple flashes of light or geometric shapes, this study used a silhouette of a human face to trigger the effect, finding it was a highly effective way to measure these visual experiences.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain errors. Always refer to the original paper for accuracy.
Most-Cited Researchers
Top 10 researchers by number of papers published in Aphantasia
1

Joel Pearson

35
2

Merlin Monzel

31
3

Adam Zeman

20
4

Rebecca Keogh

17
5

Martin Reuter

16
6

Juha Silvanto

15
7

Paolo Bartolomeo

11
8

Carla Dance

10
9

Jianghao Liu

10
10

Fraser Milton

9
Recruit the largest aphantasia cohort on earth

98.1K+ users & subscribers across the imagery spectrum, plus 1.5M+ survey responses in our dataset. Skip the recruitment bottleneck and run your study with the community we've built for a decade.

Partner with us