Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Behavioral and Neural Signatures of Visual Imagery Vividness Extremes: Aphantasia versus Hyperphantasia

Milton, F., Fulford, J., Dance, C., Gaddum, J., Heuerman-Williamson, B., Jones, K., Knight, K. F., MacKisack, M., Winlove, C., & Zeman, A. (2021). Behavioral and neural signatures of visual imagery vividness extremes: aphantasia versus hyperphantasia. Cerebral Cortex Communications, 2(2). doi:10.1093/texcom/tgab035

Abstract

Although Galton recognized in the 1880s that some individuals lack visual imagery, this phenomenon was mostly neglected over the following century. We recently coined the terms “aphantasia” and “hyperphantasia” to describe visual imagery vividness extremes, unlocking a sustained surge of public interest. Aphantasia is associated with subjective impairment of face recognition and autobiographical memory. Here we report the first systematic, wide-ranging neuropsychological and brain imaging study of people with aphantasia (n = 24), hyperphantasia (n = 25), and midrange imagery vividness (n = 20). Despite equivalent performance on standard memory tests, marked group differences were measured in autobiographical memory and imagination, participants with hyperphantasia outperforming controls who outperformed participants with aphantasia. Face recognition difficulties and autistic spectrum traits were reported more commonly in aphantasia. The Revised NEO Personality Inventory highlighted reduced extraversion in the aphantasia group and increased openness in the hyperphantasia group. Resting state fMRI revealed stronger connectivity between prefrontal cortices and the visual network among hyperphantasic than aphantasic participants. In an active fMRI paradigm, there was greater anterior parietal activation among hyperphantasic and control than aphantasic participants when comparing visualization of famous faces and places with perception. These behavioral and neural signatures of visual imagery vividness extremes validate and illuminate this significant but neglected dimension of individual difference.

Authors

  • Fraser Milton5
  • Jon Fulford2
  • Carla Dance8
  • James Gaddum2
  • Brittany Heuerman-Williamson2
  • Kealan Jones2
  • Kathryn F Knight1
  • Matthew MacKisack4
  • Crawford Winlove5
  • Adam Zeman16

What This Study Is About

Researchers wanted to see if having a "blind mind’s eye" or a "super-vivid mind’s eye" actually changes how your brain is wired and how you remember your own life.

How They Studied It

The team looked at 69 people divided into three groups: those with aphantasia (who cannot picture things in their mind), those with hyperphantasia (who see mental images as clearly as real life), and a "middle-ground" control group. Participants took personality and memory tests and underwent fMRI brain scans to see which parts of their brains were "talking" to each other while resting and while trying to imagine faces.

What They Found

The results showed that mental imagery—the ability to picture things in your head—affects more than just your imagination:
  • Memory: People with aphantasia found it harder to remember specific "internal" details about their past (like the color of a shirt they wore years ago) compared to the hyperphantasia group.
  • Social Traits: Aphantasics were more likely to report difficulties recognizing faces and had slightly higher scores on traits associated with the autism spectrum.
  • Brain Wiring: In hyperphantasics, the "vision center" at the back of the brain had much stronger connections to the "decision center" at the front. It’s like their brain has a high-speed fiber-optic cable connecting imagination to thought, whereas aphantasics may use a different "route" entirely.

What This Might Mean

This study suggests that aphantasia isn't just a quirk; it’s a different way of processing the world. It suggests that we use our "mind's eye" as a tool to help anchor our personal memories. However, because this was a relatively small study using a lower-power brain scanner, we should be careful. It doesn't prove that aphantasics have "worse" brains—it just suggests they use different strategies, like focusing on facts rather than "mental movies," to navigate life.

One Interesting Detail

Despite the differences in personal memories, people with aphantasia performed exactly the same as everyone else on standard logic and fact-based memory tests. They don't lack memory; they just lack the "picture" that usually goes with it!
This summary was generated by AI and may contain errors. Always refer to the original paper for accuracy.