Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Ask AI About This Paper
Ask AI About This Paper

Fewer intrusive memories in aphantasia: using the trauma film paradigm as a laboratory model of PTSD

DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/7zqfe
Tags:
Mental Health
Keogh, R., Wicken, M., & Pearson, J. (2023). Fewer intrusive memories in aphantasia: using the trauma film paradigm as a laboratory model of ptsd. doi:10.31234/osf.io/7zqfe

Abstract

When we live through a traumatic event some of us will go on to experience uncontrollable unpleasant memories of the event. These intrusive memories are one of the hallmarks of post-traumatic stress disorder. Intrusive memories or flashbacks are typically described as visual, and their vividness predicts the severity of PTSD. If visual imagery is central to the development and continuation of flashbacks then people without visual imagery (aphantasia) should experience less, or different, intrusive memories. To test this, a group of individuals with aphantasia and a group with visual imagery underwent a lab-based PTSD model: the trauma film paradigm. Aphantasic individuals reported fewer intrusions immediately after watching the traumatic film, as well as fewer intrusions in a digital diary app over the course of a week. Despite the significant reduction in intrusive memories, aphantasic individuals still reported having some intrusions, however, the sensory qualities of these intrusions were markedly different from individuals with visual imagery. While individuals with visual imagery reported their intrusions as being mostly visual, aphantasic individuals reported mostly verbal intrusions. These findings demonstrate that visual imagery is related to the number of intrusive memories experienced after witnessing a traumatic event, which may have important implications for the development of PTSD. Further, it does appear that aphantasic individuals can experience intrusions, albeit less frequently and in a different format than people with visual imagery.

Authors

  • Rebecca Keogh17
  • Marcus Wicken3
  • Joel Pearson35

Fewer intrusive memories in aphantasia: using the trauma film paradigm as a laboratory model of PTSD

DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/7zqfe
Tags:
Mental Health
Keogh, R., Wicken, M., & Pearson, J. (2023). Fewer intrusive memories in aphantasia: using the trauma film paradigm as a laboratory model of ptsd. doi:10.31234/osf.io/7zqfe

Abstract

When we live through a traumatic event some of us will go on to experience uncontrollable unpleasant memories of the event. These intrusive memories are one of the hallmarks of post-traumatic stress disorder. Intrusive memories or flashbacks are typically described as visual, and their vividness predicts the severity of PTSD. If visual imagery is central to the development and continuation of flashbacks then people without visual imagery (aphantasia) should experience less, or different, intrusive memories. To test this, a group of individuals with aphantasia and a group with visual imagery underwent a lab-based PTSD model: the trauma film paradigm. Aphantasic individuals reported fewer intrusions immediately after watching the traumatic film, as well as fewer intrusions in a digital diary app over the course of a week. Despite the significant reduction in intrusive memories, aphantasic individuals still reported having some intrusions, however, the sensory qualities of these intrusions were markedly different from individuals with visual imagery. While individuals with visual imagery reported their intrusions as being mostly visual, aphantasic individuals reported mostly verbal intrusions. These findings demonstrate that visual imagery is related to the number of intrusive memories experienced after witnessing a traumatic event, which may have important implications for the development of PTSD. Further, it does appear that aphantasic individuals can experience intrusions, albeit less frequently and in a different format than people with visual imagery.

Authors

  • Rebecca Keogh17
  • Marcus Wicken3
  • Joel Pearson35
Aphantasia Logo

What This Study Is About

Researchers investigated whether people with aphantasia—the inability to create mental images—are less likely to experience "flashbacks" or intrusive memories after seeing something distressing. The study explores if visual imagery acts as an "emotional amplifier" that makes traumatic memories more frequent and intense.

How They Studied It

The researchers recruited two groups: people with aphantasia and a "control" group of people with typical visual imagery. Both groups watched a "trauma film" containing distressing footage of a fatal car crash. Afterward, participants recorded any uninvited, intrusive memories of the film in a diary app for one week. They also rated the sensory nature of these memories—whether they were visual, verbal (words/thoughts), or related to space and touch.

What They Found

People with aphantasia reported significantly fewer intrusive memories than the control group, both immediately after the film and during the following week. When they did have an intrusion, it was rarely a visual "picture" in the mind. Instead, their intrusive memories were mostly verbal (like a thought or a description) or spatial. In contrast, the control group’s memories were overwhelmingly visual. The control group also reported being more distracted and negatively impacted by their flashbacks.

What This Might Mean

The results suggest that being unable to "see" a memory in the mind’s eye may provide a protective buffer against the development of PTSD-like symptoms. It supports the theory that visual imagery is a key ingredient in how our brains process and amplify emotions. However, because this was a laboratory study using a film, it doesn't prove that aphantasia prevents PTSD in real-world trauma, though it highlights a significant difference in how different minds process distressing events.

One Interesting Detail

While the control group's intrusive memories were almost entirely visual, the aphantasic group's most common form of "flashback" was verbal—essentially thinking about the event in words rather than seeing it.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain errors. Always refer to the original paper for accuracy.
Most-Cited Researchers
Top 10 researchers by number of papers published in Aphantasia
1

Joel Pearson

35
2

Merlin Monzel

31
3

Adam Zeman

20
4

Rebecca Keogh

17
5

Martin Reuter

16
6

Juha Silvanto

15
7

Paolo Bartolomeo

11
8

Carla Dance

10
9

Jianghao Liu

10
10

Fraser Milton

9
Recruit the largest aphantasia cohort on earth

98K+ users & subscribers across the imagery spectrum, plus 1.5M+ survey responses in our dataset. Skip the recruitment bottleneck and run your study with the community we've built for a decade.

Partner with us