Imagery and perception feel similar but aren't. Research into aphantasia is helping explain where the two diverge.
Alexander of Aphrodisias defines phantasia as a physiological process where residues from past perceptions trigger involuntary mental pictures of absent objects. This suggests that mental imagery is rooted in physical changes rather than direct sensory input.
Hangai, A. (2025). Alexander of aphrodisias on mental representation. Rhizomata, 13(2), 183–223. doi:10.1515/rhiz-2025-0007
People with aphantasia were as accurate as typical and vivid imagers on imagery and perception tasks, but slower. The authors suggest visual knowledge is still reached without a conscious image, or through other strategies.
Liu, J., & Bartolomeo, P. (2023). Probing the unimaginable: the impact of aphantasia on distinct domains of visual mental imagery and visual perception. Cortex, 166, 338–347. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2023.06.003
You've reached the end of content in the perception topic.
Our course gives you a profile of your own mind, the words to explain it to the people in your life, and the evidence to hand anyone who says you are not trying. The first two modules are free.