Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Ask AI About This Paper
Ask AI About This Paper

Alexander of Aphrodisias on Mental Representation

DOI: 10.1515/rhiz-2025-0007
Tags:
PhantasiaPerceptionTheory & Definitions
Hangai, A. (2025). Alexander of aphrodisias on mental representation. Rhizomata, 13(2), 183–223. doi:10.1515/rhiz-2025-0007

Abstract

Alexander took phantasia as a capacity separate from perception by appealing to differences in their defining objects. While the object of perception is external, that of phantasia is internal: a residue of perceptual activity. What is it in virtue of which the residue represents its content? I argue for a causal account: a residue represents in virtue of preserving fully some content that originates in perception with which it has causal continuity , sometimes involving internal causal mechanisms ( impressing further and picturing ) that modify the residue. I suggest that this account can serve as a foundation for explaining representation.

Authors

  • Attila Hangai1

Alexander of Aphrodisias on Mental Representation

DOI: 10.1515/rhiz-2025-0007
Tags:
PhantasiaPerceptionTheory & Definitions
Hangai, A. (2025). Alexander of aphrodisias on mental representation. Rhizomata, 13(2), 183–223. doi:10.1515/rhiz-2025-0007

Abstract

Alexander took phantasia as a capacity separate from perception by appealing to differences in their defining objects. While the object of perception is external, that of phantasia is internal: a residue of perceptual activity. What is it in virtue of which the residue represents its content? I argue for a causal account: a residue represents in virtue of preserving fully some content that originates in perception with which it has causal continuity , sometimes involving internal causal mechanisms ( impressing further and picturing ) that modify the residue. I suggest that this account can serve as a foundation for explaining representation.

Authors

  • Attila Hangai1
Aphantasia Logo

What This Study Is About

This research explores how the ancient philosopher Alexander of Aphrodisias explained "phantasia"—the mind's ability to represent things that are not currently present. It investigates how the brain creates internal "residues" or mental images from past experiences and how these images can sometimes be modified or lead to errors.

How They Studied It

This is a philosophical analysis rather than a clinical trial. The researcher examined historical texts written by Alexander of Aphrodisias, an influential commentator on Aristotle. By analyzing these ancient theories of the mind, the author reconstructed a model of how mental representation (the way our minds "stand in" for real objects) works through a chain of physical and mental causes.

What They Found

The study highlights that Alexander viewed phantasia as a "residue" of actual perception. When we see something, it leaves a physical and mental trace. The researcher found that:
  • Mental images are "causally continuous" with the real world, meaning they are direct leftovers from what we have actually seen.
  • The mind has internal mechanisms called "impressing further" and "picturing" that can modify these traces.
  • These modifications explain why we can imagine things that don't exist or why our memories might be slightly different from reality.

What This Might Mean

This research suggests that the concept of aphantasia—the inability to voluntarily create mental imagery—has roots in philosophical debates dating back nearly 2,000 years. It shows that early thinkers were already grappling with how the mind "pictures" the world and what happens when that process is interrupted or altered. While this study focuses on ancient theory rather than modern neuroscience, it provides a historical foundation for understanding how humans have always tried to explain the "presence in absence" of mental images.

One Interesting Detail

Alexander of Aphrodisias used the term "residue" to describe mental images, suggesting they are like the physical tracks or echoes left behind after the original sensory experience has ended.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain errors. Always refer to the original paper for accuracy.
Most-Cited Researchers
Top 10 researchers by number of papers published in Aphantasia
1

Joel Pearson

35
2

Merlin Monzel

31
3

Adam Zeman

20
4

Rebecca Keogh

17
5

Martin Reuter

16
6

Juha Silvanto

15
7

Paolo Bartolomeo

11
8

Carla Dance

10
9

Jianghao Liu

10
10

Fraser Milton

9
Recruit the largest aphantasia cohort on earth

98.1K+ users & subscribers across the imagery spectrum, plus 1.5M+ survey responses in our dataset. Skip the recruitment bottleneck and run your study with the community we've built for a decade.

Partner with us