Rethinking modality-specificity in mental imagery
CalzavariniMay 2026
Abstract
Despite recent attention to multimodal imagery, the field remains dominated by the traditional view that mental imagery is divided by sensory modality. However, growing evidence from neuroscience challenges this view, showing that brain areas traditionally thought to be modality-specific actually process sensory information (e.g. shape, motion, or speech) independently from modality, even in sensory-deprived individuals. This paper argues that the assumption of modality-specificity in mental imagery should be significantly revised, if not abandoned. Instead, it proposes a shift in perspective: mental imagery may be better understood in terms of modality-invariant properties, such as shape or frequency, rather than sensory-based divisions.
Our summary in plain words
What This Study Is About
How They Studied It
What They Found
What This Might Mean
One Interesting Detail
This summary was written with AI and may contain errors. Check the original paper.
Authors
Fabrizio Calzavarini
1 paper in the library
Cite this paper
Calzavarini, F. (2026). Rethinking modality-specificity in mental imagery. Synthese, 207(5). doi:10.1007/s11229-026-05561-6
Topics
Most-cited researchers
Recruit participants for your study
We can help you reach people across the imagery spectrum, from aphantasia to hyperphantasia.
Partner with usImage-Free Insights
A short note from our founder, Tom Ebeyer, every other week, plus occasional news and invitations to take part in studies. Change what you get from any email.