Three ways to engage with aphantasia research on the Network.
Three ways to engage with aphantasia research on the Network.
Explore a comprehensive collection of academic papers, research studies, and scientific publications about aphantasia, imagery, and cognitive neuroscience.
Explore a comprehensive collection of academic papers, research studies, and scientific publications about aphantasia, imagery, and cognitive neuroscience.
Researchers found that Akhter Ahsen’s ISM model anticipated modern findings on the embodied and emotional nature of mental imagery. This suggests historical clinical frameworks can help bridge the gap between neuroscience and therapeutic practice.
Syed, A., & Neelofur, S. (n.d.). A narrative review of eidetic imagery and the early architecture of mental imagery research: revisiting akhter ahsen’s foundational contributions. Medical Research Archives. doi:10.18103/mra.v14i4.7364
Aphantasic individuals showed eye movement patterns similar to visualizers when exploring mental maps despite reporting no subjective imagery. This suggests aphantasia may reflect reduced metacognitive access to imagery rather than a total absence of representational content.
Takamura, Y., Coustaty, S., Liu, J., Razzak, E., Pouget, P., Spagna, A., & Bartolomeo, P. (2026). Similar eye movements in aphantasia and visualizers during mental map exploration. Cortex, 203, 48–73. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2026.06.010
Autistic aphantasics are more likely to be verbal thinkers, while non-autistic aphantasics report more intact multisensory imagery. This highlights how neurodivergence shapes the diverse cognitive and emotional lived experiences of aphantasia.
Zhong, S., Jones, K., Knight, K. F., Milton, F., Russell, G., Zeman, A., & Happé, F. (2026). Exploring the experiences of autistic and non-autistic aphantasics: a qualitative study. Neuropsychologia, 231, 109540. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2026.109540
Participants with aphantasia reported significantly higher ability to generate kinaesthetic imagery compared to visual imagery, especially when primed by physical action. This suggests kinaesthetic imagery can function independently of visual imagery.
Wright, D. J., Scott, M. W., Esselaar, M., Braithwaite, E. C., & Holmes, P. S. (2026). Motor imagery abilities in individuals who experience aphantasia. Neuropsychologia, 230, 109530. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2026.109530
Aphantasia reveals that abstract thought does not require the capacity to manipulate mental images. This suggests that higher-level cognition can function independently of imagistic processes.
Tooming, U., & Jakapi, R. (2026). Aphantasia as a challenge for humean abstraction. Neuropsychologia, 227, 109465. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2026.109465
Researchers found that Western musical modes elicit systematic patterns of visual and olfactory imagery. This indicates musical modes are associated with multiple sensory representations extending beyond simple feature-level correspondences.
Pimentel Aldaz, O., & Spence, C. (2026). Seeing scent in sound: exploratory spontaneous visual and olfactory mental imagery elicited by musical modes. Multisensory Research, 1–45. doi:10.1163/22134808-bja10200
Older adults reported more vivid visual and multisensory imagery, while aphantasia was more prevalent in younger groups. This suggests that age should be considered when identifying aphantasia and setting diagnostic thresholds.
Takahashi, J., Omura, K., & Sugimura, S. (2026). Age differences in visual and multisensory imagery: notes on distributions of aphantasia and hyperphantasia in individuals aged 20s–70s. Neuropsychologia, 226, 109433. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2026.109433
VVIQ items showed high redundancy for identifying aphantasia, with inter-item correlations ranging from .79 to .90. A single screening question about visualizing a familiar place achieved high specificity (98.8%) and sensitivity (97.5%) against the strictest definition of core aphantasia (VVIQ = 16), suggesting the full 16-item questionnaire is unnecessary for screening purposes.
Monzel, M., Pickering, J. W., Condon, D. M., Beran, M. J., & Ebeyer, T. (2026). Reimagining the vividness of visual imagery questionnaire as a single item screener for aphantasia. Consciousness and Cognition, 142, 104061. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2026.104061
Researchers discovered that aphantasia and vividness judgements are compromised by poorly defined references for typical imagery. This indicates that current measures like the VVIQ may be invalid and misleading.
Sulfaro, A. A. (2026). Mental image vividness and aphantasia judgements are fundamentally compromised by overlooked definition problems. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 33(5). doi:10.3758/s13423-026-02928-1
Aphantasics showed normal visual working memory performance and decodable neural representations in the visual cortex. This suggests aphantasia is a lack of conscious awareness rather than an inability to generate or store visual information.
Knight, K. F., Milton, F., & Zeman, A. (2026). Aphantasia and visual working memory: no direct evidence of impaired visual working memory in aphantasics, either in behavioral performance or the accuracy of a multivoxel pattern classifier. Neuropsychologia, 226, 109430. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2026.109430
Researchers found that higher vividness of mental imagery is often associated with an increased occurrence of visual hallucinations across several clinical conditions. This suggests that hyper-functioning visual associative areas may drive both phenomena.
Panigutti, M., Bechi Gabrielli, G., Conti, D., Accinni, T., Zazzaro, G., Di Vita, A., Guariglia, C., & D’Antonio, F. (2026). Seeing without eyes: relation between visual mental imagery and visual hallucinations. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 184, 106621. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2026.106621
Researchers found that anauralia and aphantasia share a 0.8% prevalence but have distinct psychological profiles. This suggests that the absence of sensory imagery is modality-specific rather than a single, unified condition.
Lambert, A. J., Schelp, Z. M., Quigley-Tump, G., Tan, V., Purdy, S., & Sibley, C. (2026). Anauralia and aphantasia: prevalence and distinct associations with personality, well-being and self-regulation in a large, representative sample.. Neuropsychologia, 109527. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2026.109527
Researchers discovered that mental imagery reactivates the same sensory code as perception at the single-neuron level. This suggests that aphantasia may stem from how this shared activity is generated, modulated, or read out by the brain.
Fleming, S. M., & Dijkstra, N. (2026). A neuronal basis for mental imagery. Cell Research. doi:10.1038/s41422-026-01260-6
Researchers found that imagining a moral dilemma from a third-person perspective is linked to higher acceptability of harmful actions. This suggests visual perspective, not just vividness, helps shape how we make moral decisions.
Ernst, M., Kronbichler, M., & Meyer, P. (2026). The perspective-simulating mind: internal representations in moral judgment and action. Scientific Reports. doi:10.1038/s41598-026-53224-w
Researchers found that brain areas process mental imagery using modality-invariant properties rather than sensory-specific divisions. This suggests mental imagery and aphantasia are best understood through a supramodal framework.
Calzavarini, F. (2026). Rethinking modality-specificity in mental imagery. Synthese, 207(5). doi:10.1007/s11229-026-05561-6
Congenital aphantasia likely stems from impaired access to intact visual representations rather than a total lack of mental content. This suggests conscious visualization is an emergent property of large-scale network coordination.
Bartolomeo, P. (2026). Aphantasia and the mechanisms of visual mental imagery. Annual Review of Vision Science. doi:10.1146/annurev-vision-110425-105103
Aphantasics performed as well as controls on feature-binding tasks even when verbal labeling was difficult. This suggests that mental imagery is not necessary for conjunctive binding, which likely relies on automatic mechanisms.
Delhaye, E., Fritz, P., Martial, C., & Bastin, C. (2026). The role of visual imagery and verbal coding in short-term memory conjunctive binding: evidence from aphantasia. Consciousness and Cognition, 141, 104036. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2026.104036
Aphantasia is linked to higher rates of neurodevelopmental, neurological, and psychiatric disorders compared to typical imagery. This highlights the need for multisensory evaluations and tailored interventions for neurodiverse profiles.
New, B., Barra, J., Chauvin, A., Huson, N., & Lœvenbruck, H. (2026). Multimodal mental imagery profiles and the prevalence of aphantasia and hyperphantasia in the general population. Cortex. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2026.04.019
Please provide the title or content of the paper you would like me to summarize. Once you provide the details, I will generate a concise 2-sentence excerpt for the library.
Scholz, C. O., Monzel, M., Kvamme, T. L., Liu, J., & Silvanto, J. (2026). An integration model of mental imagery and aphantasia: conceptual framework, neuromechanistic pathways, and clinical implications. Neuropsychologia, 225, 109401. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2026.109401
Aphantasic individuals showed a robust picture superiority effect and recalled symbols better than pictures. This challenges dual-coding theory by demonstrating that visual imagery is not essential for the memory advantages of image-based stimuli.
Yan, M., Roberts, B. R., & Bainbridge, W. A. (2026). Challenging dual-coding theory: picture superiority effects persist in aphantasia. Neuropsychologia, 225, 109391. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2026.109391
94.6K+ users & subscribers across the imagery spectrum, plus 1.5M+ survey responsesin our dataset. Skip the recruitment bottleneck and run your study with the community we've built for a decade.