Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Ask AI About This Paper
Ask AI About This Paper

Similar eye movements in aphantasia and visualizers during mental map exploration

DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2026.06.010
Tags:
Spatial ImageryTheory & Definitions
Takamura, Y., Coustaty, S., Liu, J., Razzak, E., Pouget, P., Spagna, A., & Bartolomeo, P. (2026). Similar eye movements in aphantasia and visualizers during mental map exploration. Cortex, 203, 48–73. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2026.06.010

Abstract

During visual mental imagery, our eyes tend to reproduce patterns of movement similar to those observed in visual perception, even in the absence of external stimuli. However, imagery vividness varies along a spectrum, with congenital aphantasia at the lower extreme, where individuals report a reduced or absent ability to visualize voluntarily. Nevertheless, they can typically state from memory that Bordeaux is to the left of Paris on a map of France while denying having conjured any mental image. What cognitive mechanisms underlie this dissociation? Some theories suggest aphantasia stems from impaired image generation, while others propose it reflects a lack of metacognitive awareness of visual mental imagery. This study examines oculomotor patterns in aphantasia and visualizers during a mental exploration task involving an imagined map of France. We tested four competing hypotheses: H1: reduced eye movements in aphantasia are due to absent mental images; H2: increased exploratory eye movements in aphantasia as a sensorimotor compensatory strategy; H3: typical eye movements in aphantasia are associated with impaired metacognitive access, or H4: heterogeneous eye movement patterns in aphantasia. Results revealed that aphantasic individuals tended to look toward imagined targets just as visualizers do, consistent with H3. This suggests that congenital aphantasia is not the absence of visual mental images but may instead reflect reduced metacognitive access to imagery or a reliance on effective non-visual strategies capable of producing performance patterns similar to those of visualizers.

Authors

  • Yusaku Takamura1
  • Sarah Coustaty1
  • Jianghao Liu9
  • Emaad Razzak1
  • Pierre Pouget1
  • Alfredo Spagna5
  • Paolo Bartolomeo11

Similar eye movements in aphantasia and visualizers during mental map exploration

DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2026.06.010
Tags:
Spatial ImageryTheory & Definitions
Takamura, Y., Coustaty, S., Liu, J., Razzak, E., Pouget, P., Spagna, A., & Bartolomeo, P. (2026). Similar eye movements in aphantasia and visualizers during mental map exploration. Cortex, 203, 48–73. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2026.06.010

Abstract

During visual mental imagery, our eyes tend to reproduce patterns of movement similar to those observed in visual perception, even in the absence of external stimuli. However, imagery vividness varies along a spectrum, with congenital aphantasia at the lower extreme, where individuals report a reduced or absent ability to visualize voluntarily. Nevertheless, they can typically state from memory that Bordeaux is to the left of Paris on a map of France while denying having conjured any mental image. What cognitive mechanisms underlie this dissociation? Some theories suggest aphantasia stems from impaired image generation, while others propose it reflects a lack of metacognitive awareness of visual mental imagery. This study examines oculomotor patterns in aphantasia and visualizers during a mental exploration task involving an imagined map of France. We tested four competing hypotheses: H1: reduced eye movements in aphantasia are due to absent mental images; H2: increased exploratory eye movements in aphantasia as a sensorimotor compensatory strategy; H3: typical eye movements in aphantasia are associated with impaired metacognitive access, or H4: heterogeneous eye movement patterns in aphantasia. Results revealed that aphantasic individuals tended to look toward imagined targets just as visualizers do, consistent with H3. This suggests that congenital aphantasia is not the absence of visual mental images but may instead reflect reduced metacognitive access to imagery or a reliance on effective non-visual strategies capable of producing performance patterns similar to those of visualizers.

Authors

  • Yusaku Takamura1
  • Sarah Coustaty1
  • Jianghao Liu9
  • Emaad Razzak1
  • Pierre Pouget1
  • Alfredo Spagna5
  • Paolo Bartolomeo11
Aphantasia Logo

What This Study Is About

Researchers investigated whether people with aphantasia—the inability to voluntarily create mental images—still show the same eye movement patterns as "visualizers" when exploring a map in their minds. The study aimed to determine if aphantasia is a total absence of mental imagery or a lack of conscious awareness of images that the brain is still processing.

How They Studied It

The study involved 24 French-speaking participants: 12 with aphantasia and 12 visualizers. Participants performed tasks involving a map of France under three conditions:
  • Pure Imagery: Imagining the map from memory and "looking" toward specific cities.
  • Imagery with Map Outline: Imagining cities while looking at a blank border of the country.
  • Audiovisual: Looking at an actual map with cities marked.
Researchers used eye-tracking technology to record exactly where participants looked while they answered questions about city locations.

What They Found

The researchers discovered that people with aphantasia moved their eyes toward the "imagined" locations of cities just as much as visualizers did. Even though the aphantasic group reported seeing no mental images, their eyes automatically tracked to the correct areas of the "mental map." This suggests that their brains were processing spatial information in a way that mirrored visual imagery, despite the lack of a subjective "picture" in their minds.

What This Might Mean

These findings suggest that aphantasia might not be a complete absence of mental imagery. Instead, it may reflect "reduced metacognitive access"—meaning the brain creates the "image" or spatial map, but the person isn't consciously aware of it. Alternatively, it could mean people with aphantasia use highly effective non-visual strategies that happen to trigger the same eye movements. While the study used a small group, the results provide strong evidence that the "mind's eye" may be working behind the scenes even when it feels blind.

One Interesting Detail

The eye-tracking patterns were so similar that in the "pure imagery" condition, the evidence for looking toward imagined targets was actually statistically stronger in the aphantasic group than in the visualizers.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain errors. Always refer to the original paper for accuracy.
Most-Cited Researchers
Top 10 researchers by number of papers published in Aphantasia
1

Joel Pearson

35
2

Merlin Monzel

30
3

Adam Zeman

20
4

Rebecca Keogh

17
5

Martin Reuter

16
6

Juha Silvanto

14
7

Paolo Bartolomeo

11
8

Carla Dance

10
9

Jianghao Liu

9
10

Fraser Milton

9
Recruit the largest aphantasia cohort on earth

97.8K+ users & subscribers across the imagery spectrum, plus 1.5M+ survey responses in our dataset. Skip the recruitment bottleneck and run your study with the community we've built for a decade.

Partner with us