Outlining a brain model of mental imaging abilities
Faw, B. (n.d.). Outlining a brain model of mental imaging abilities. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 21(3), 283–288. doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(96)00026-7
Abstract
This paper outlines a brain model of mental imaging abilities by reviewing neuropsychological evidence of the association and dissociation between mental imaging processes and known perceptual mechanisms; differentiating between visual-mode and auditory-mode thought systems; pointing to brain arousal systems involved in waking and dream imaging; and exploring pre-frontal involvement in deliberate imaging and cognitive state monitoring. In the process, the paper develops an emerging distinction between objective-imagery and subjective-imagery abilities. It ends by suggesting possible brain models for in-born and clinical loss of subjective imaging abilities.
Authors
- Bill Faw1
What This Study Is About
Bill Faw wanted to understand the "wiring" behind how we see pictures in our heads. He specifically looked at why some people (like himself) are "non-imagers"—people who can't visualize anything while awake, a condition we now call aphantasia.
How They Studied It
This wasn't a typical lab experiment with a group of volunteers. Instead, it was a "review paper." Faw gathered decades of existing research, including studies on brain-damaged patients, brain scans, and historical data. He even used his own experience as a non-imager to help build a map of how the brain handles mental imagery (the ability to picture things in your mind).
What They Found
Faw discovered that "seeing" with your eyes and "seeing" with your mind use many of the same brain pathways, but they aren't identical. Key findings include:
- The Big Split: You can "know" what an object looks like (objective imagery) without actually "seeing" it in your head (subjective imagery). It’s like a computer that knows all the data in a photo file but has the monitor turned off.
- The Dream Paradox: Many people who can’t visualize while awake still have vivid, colorful dreams. This suggests the brain has different "power sources" for dreaming versus intentional daydreaming.
- Control Centers: He proposed that the front part of the brain (the pre-frontal cortex) acts like a director, trying to pull images out of storage, while the back of the brain is where the "pictures" actually happen.
What This Might Mean
This research suggests that aphantasia isn't a "disability," but a different way the brain is organized. It implies that for aphantasics, the "director" in the front of the brain might have trouble "calling up" the images from the back.
A note of caution: Because this paper is a theoretical model based on older research from 1997, it doesn't prove exactly which neurons are responsible. It "suggests" a map for future scientists to follow rather than providing a final answer.
One Interesting Detail
Faw describes his own mind as having "blindsight." He can "feel" the spatial layout of a room in his mind and navigate it perfectly, but he does it all in total darkness without a single visual image!
This summary was generated by AI and may contain errors. Always refer to the original paper for accuracy.