Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Ask AI About This Paper
Ask AI About This Paper

Redefining the Distinction Between the Mind’s Ear and the Inner Voice

DOI: 10.1080/25742442.2026.2625168
Tags:
Inner Speech
Hubbard, T. L. (2026). Redefining the distinction between the mind’s ear and the inner voice. Auditory Perception & Cognition, 9(1), 7–33. doi:10.1080/25742442.2026.2625168

Authors

  • Timothy L. Hubbard1

Redefining the Distinction Between the Mind’s Ear and the Inner Voice

DOI: 10.1080/25742442.2026.2625168
Tags:
Inner Speech
Hubbard, T. L. (2026). Redefining the distinction between the mind’s ear and the inner voice. Auditory Perception & Cognition, 9(1), 7–33. doi:10.1080/25742442.2026.2625168

Authors

  • Timothy L. Hubbard1
Aphantasia Logo

What This Study Is About

This research explores the "inner voice" and the "mind’s ear," investigating how we imagine sounds and speech. It specifically looks at how our physical body—like tiny, silent movements in the throat—plays a role in creating these mental sounds.

How They Studied It

The author reviewed decades of existing research on auditory imagery (the ability to "hear" sounds in your mind). These studies involved various methods:
  • Brain Scans: Looking at which parts of the brain light up when people imagine music or speech.
  • Muscle Tracking: Using sensors to detect "subvocalization"—tiny movements in the larynx (voice box) and lips that happen even when a person is silent.
  • Interference Tests: Asking participants to perform tasks like humming or repeating a nonsense word to see if it blocks their ability to imagine other sounds.
  • Aphantasia Comparisons: Referencing studies that compare people with typical imagery to those with aphantasia (the inability to voluntarily create mental images).

What They Found

The research suggests that auditory imagery isn't just one thing; it involves two different pathways in the brain. One pathway (the "mind’s ear") identifies what a sound is, while the other (the "inner voice") is linked to the physical action of making that sound. Key findings include:
  • Physical Connection: When people imagine speaking or singing, their throat muscles often move as if they were actually making the sound.
  • Blocking Imagery: If you occupy your mouth or throat (by humming or chewing gum), it becomes much harder to experience "earworms" or imagine speech.
  • Aphantasia Links: People with aphantasia often report a weaker or non-existent inner voice, suggesting that the "blindness" of the mind's eye often extends to the mind's ear.

What This Might Mean

This suggests that mental imagery is "embodied," meaning it is deeply tied to our physical bodies and motor systems, not just abstract thoughts in the brain. For those with aphantasia or anauralia (the absence of an inner voice), it suggests their brains may process information without using these sensory-motor simulations. However, because much of this is based on self-reporting and indirect muscle measurements, more research is needed to understand the exact mechanics.

One Interesting Detail

Researchers found that "earworms"—those catchy songs that get stuck in your head—can often be stopped or weakened simply by chewing gum, as the physical movement interferes with the brain's ability to "play" the song using the inner voice pathway.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain errors. Always refer to the original paper for accuracy.
Most-Cited Researchers
Top 10 researchers by number of papers published in Aphantasia
1

Joel Pearson

35
2

Merlin Monzel

30
3

Adam Zeman

20
4

Rebecca Keogh

17
5

Martin Reuter

16
6

Juha Silvanto

14
7

Paolo Bartolomeo

11
8

Carla Dance

10
9

Jianghao Liu

9
10

Fraser Milton

9
Recruit the largest aphantasia cohort on earth

97.4K+ users & subscribers across the imagery spectrum, plus 1.5M+ survey responses in our dataset. Skip the recruitment bottleneck and run your study with the community we've built for a decade.

Partner with us