This research explores how musicians who cannot "hear" music in their minds—a condition called anauralia (auditory aphantasia)—are still able to learn, practice, and perform complex pieces. It investigates the alternative strategies these individuals use to think about sound when they lack a "mind's ear."
How They Studied It
The researcher conducted an in-depth study of musicians who report a complete absence of auditory imagery (the ability to mentally replay sounds). The study involved qualitative interviews and task-based observations to see how these musicians prepared for performances. Their experiences were compared against existing theories of musical cognition and data from "typical" imagers who can easily conjure melodies in their heads.
What They Found
The study found that musicians with anauralia do not need an internal "audio playback" to be successful. Instead, they rely on a combination of four "imagery-independent" strategies:
Kinesthetic scaffolding: Relying on the physical "feel" and muscle memory of playing an instrument.
Visual/Notational support: Using the mental or physical image of sheet music and finger patterns.
Verbal mediation: Using words or labels to describe musical structures.
Theoretical reasoning: Using an understanding of music theory to predict and organize what comes next.
What This Might Mean
This suggests that musical thinking is "multimodal," meaning it can be built from many different building blocks, not just sound. While traditional music education often tells students to "hear the note before you play it," this research indicates that such instructions may be unhelpful for those with anauralia. It highlights a need for more inclusive teaching methods that recognize different ways of processing music. However, the study notes that while these musicians are highly capable, they may feel less flexible in spontaneous situations, like jazz improvisation, where "inner hearing" is often heavily emphasized.
One Interesting Detail
The study points out that because people with anauralia often perform just as well as typical imagers on standard tests, their unique way of thinking is often "masked" or invisible to teachers and researchers until they are asked specifically about their internal experience.
This research explores how musicians who cannot "hear" music in their minds—a condition called anauralia (auditory aphantasia)—are still able to learn, practice, and perform complex pieces. It investigates the alternative strategies these individuals use to think about sound when they lack a "mind's ear."
You’ve used your five free reads
Members read everything here, and put their own questions to the researchers at live talks.
Every talk recorded, with the questions
The members’ Discord, between talks
The Aphantasia Explained course, with Annual
Prices in US dollars, plus tax where it applies. 30 days to change your mind.
This summary was written with AI and may contain errors. Check the original paper.
Tolman, D. (2026). Musical reasoning without a mind’s ear: a comparative case study. Auditory Perception & Cognition, 1–14. doi:10.1080/25742442.2026.2640817
A short note from our founder, Tom Ebeyer, every other week, plus occasional news and invitations to take part in studies. Change what you get from any email.
Seeing Scent in Sound: Exploratory Spontaneous Visual and Olfactory Mental Imagery Elicited by Musical Modes
Pimentel Aldaz and Spence · Multisensory Research
In an online study, 249 UK adults (almost all women) listened to short piano pieces in each of the seven Western musical modes and wrote down the scenes and smells each piece brought to mind. Major modes tended to bring up nature, daytime and flowers; minor modes brought up darkness, stress, damp and smoke, and people grouped the pieces along the same line. The study was exploratory and did not measure how well each person could imagine.
2026
Redefining the Distinction Between the Mind’s Ear and the Inner Voice
Hubbard · Auditory Perception & Cognition
This review questions the usual line between the mind's ear (imagining outside sounds) and the inner voice (imagining one's own voice), which holds that only the inner voice carries movement information. Brain and muscle studies find movement-related activity when people imagine melodies and instrument sounds too, so the review argues that line does not hold. It suggests widening the inner voice to any sound a person makes, and separating the two by whether a sound is mapped to meaning or to action. It also asks whether someone without auditory imagery could keep its movement side.
2025
“Unseen strategies” what can the experience of Aphantasia teach us about cognitive strategies in memory?
Hayes, Miles and Evans · New Ideas in Psychology
Five people with aphantasia described leaning on facts, a soundless inner voice, and notes, photos and other people to remember. The authors suggest these strategies help but only partly offset real memory difficulties.