Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Ask AI About This Paper
Ask AI About This Paper

VISUAL IMAGERY DIFFERENCES IN THE RECALL OF PICTURES

DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1973.tb01322.x
Tags:
MemoryVisualization
MARKS, D. F. (1973). Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. British Journal of Psychology, 64(1), 17–24. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1973.tb01322.x

Abstract

Male and female subjects who differed in their verbal reports of visual image vividness were tested for recall in three experiments involving coloured photographs as stimuli. In all three experiments subjects who reported vivid visual imagery were more accurate in recall than subjects who reported poor visual imagery. In the first two experiments, females recalled more accurately than males. On the assumption that vividness reports and recall were both mediated by the same covert event ‐ a visual image ‐ these results provide further evidence that images have an important role in memory.

Authors

  • David F. Marks3

VISUAL IMAGERY DIFFERENCES IN THE RECALL OF PICTURES

DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1973.tb01322.x
Tags:
MemoryVisualization
MARKS, D. F. (1973). Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. British Journal of Psychology, 64(1), 17–24. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1973.tb01322.x

Abstract

Male and female subjects who differed in their verbal reports of visual image vividness were tested for recall in three experiments involving coloured photographs as stimuli. In all three experiments subjects who reported vivid visual imagery were more accurate in recall than subjects who reported poor visual imagery. In the first two experiments, females recalled more accurately than males. On the assumption that vividness reports and recall were both mediated by the same covert event ‐ a visual image ‐ these results provide further evidence that images have an important role in memory.

Authors

  • David F. Marks3
Aphantasia Logo

What This Study Is About

Researchers wanted to know if people who report having vivid mental imagery—the ability to "see" pictures in their mind—are better at remembering details from photographs than those with dim or no mental imagery.

How They Studied It

The researcher conducted three experiments involving university students and teenagers. Participants first completed the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire (VVIQ), which asks people to rate the clarity of their mental images on a scale from 1 (perfectly clear) to 5 (no image at all).
Based on these scores, participants were divided into "good visualizers" and "poor visualizers." They were shown color photographs of scenes or groups of objects for 20 seconds. After a short delay where they performed a counting task to prevent simple verbal rehearsal, they were asked multiple-choice questions about specific details, such as the time on a clock or the position of an object.

What They Found

In all three experiments, "good visualizers" (those who reported vivid imagery) were significantly more accurate at recalling details than "poor visualizers." For example, in the first experiment, vivid imagers averaged about 3.17 correct answers out of 5, while poor imagers averaged 2.85. The study also found that females generally recalled more details than males in the first two experiments.

What This Might Mean

These results suggest that mental imagery plays a functional role in memory. If someone can create a vivid "mental photograph" of what they just saw, they may be able to "look" at that image later to retrieve specific details. While this suggests a strong link between imagery and memory, it does not mean that people with poor imagery (including those with aphantasia) cannot remember things; rather, they may use different strategies or be slightly less precise on tasks specifically designed to test visual detail.

One Interesting Detail

To make sure participants weren't just repeating the names of objects to themselves, the researchers made them count backward by threes (e.g., 794, 791, 788) while trying to keep the picture in their mind. Even with this distraction, the vivid imagers still performed better.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain errors. Always refer to the original paper for accuracy.
Most-Cited Researchers
Top 10 researchers by number of papers published in Aphantasia
1

Joel Pearson

35
2

Merlin Monzel

30
3

Adam Zeman

20
4

Rebecca Keogh

17
5

Martin Reuter

16
6

Juha Silvanto

14
7

Paolo Bartolomeo

11
8

Carla Dance

10
9

Jianghao Liu

9
10

Fraser Milton

9
Recruit the largest aphantasia cohort on earth

97.8K+ users & subscribers across the imagery spectrum, plus 1.5M+ survey responses in our dataset. Skip the recruitment bottleneck and run your study with the community we've built for a decade.

Partner with us