Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Ask AI About This Paper
Ask AI About This Paper

Mental Simulations and Action Language Are Impaired in Individuals with Aphantasia

DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_02084
Tags:
Theory & Definitions
Dupont, W., Papaxanthis, C., Lebon, F., & Madden-Lombardi, C. (2023). Mental simulations and action language are impaired in individuals with aphantasia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1–11. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_02084

Abstract

Action reading is thought to engage motor simulations, such as those involved during the generation of mental motor images. These simulations would yield modulations in activity of motor-related cortical regions and contribute to action language comprehension. To test these ideas, we measured corticospinal excitability during action reading, and reading comprehension ability, in individuals with normal and impaired imagery (i.e., phantasia and aphantasia, respectively). Thirty-four participants (17 phantasic and 17 aphantasic) were asked to read manual action sentences. By means of TMS, we triggered motor-evoked potentials in the target right index finger. Motor-evoked potential amplitude, a marker of corticospinal excitability, increased during action reading relative to rest for phantasic individuals, but not for aphantasic individuals. This result provides neurophysiological evidence that individuals living with aphantasia present a real neurophysiological deficit in motor system engagement during action reading. Furthermore, deep-level reading comprehension ability was impaired in individuals with aphantasia, who had difficulty selecting words that best fit the context of sentences. Altogether, these findings support the idea that motor simulations, along with the activation within the motor system, contribute to action language comprehension.

Authors

  • William Dupont2
  • Charalambos Papaxanthis2
  • Florent Lebon3
  • Carol Madden-Lombardi2

Mental Simulations and Action Language Are Impaired in Individuals with Aphantasia

DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_02084
Tags:
Theory & Definitions
Dupont, W., Papaxanthis, C., Lebon, F., & Madden-Lombardi, C. (2023). Mental simulations and action language are impaired in individuals with aphantasia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1–11. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_02084

Abstract

Action reading is thought to engage motor simulations, such as those involved during the generation of mental motor images. These simulations would yield modulations in activity of motor-related cortical regions and contribute to action language comprehension. To test these ideas, we measured corticospinal excitability during action reading, and reading comprehension ability, in individuals with normal and impaired imagery (i.e., phantasia and aphantasia, respectively). Thirty-four participants (17 phantasic and 17 aphantasic) were asked to read manual action sentences. By means of TMS, we triggered motor-evoked potentials in the target right index finger. Motor-evoked potential amplitude, a marker of corticospinal excitability, increased during action reading relative to rest for phantasic individuals, but not for aphantasic individuals. This result provides neurophysiological evidence that individuals living with aphantasia present a real neurophysiological deficit in motor system engagement during action reading. Furthermore, deep-level reading comprehension ability was impaired in individuals with aphantasia, who had difficulty selecting words that best fit the context of sentences. Altogether, these findings support the idea that motor simulations, along with the activation within the motor system, contribute to action language comprehension.

Authors

  • William Dupont2
  • Charalambos Papaxanthis2
  • Florent Lebon3
  • Carol Madden-Lombardi2
Aphantasia Logo

What This Study Is About

Researchers investigated whether aphantasia—the inability to create mental images—affects how the brain processes language about physical actions. They wanted to know if people who cannot "see" things in their mind also fail to "simulate" movements in their brain when reading words like "grasp" or "kick."

How They Studied It

The study included 32 participants: 16 with aphantasia and 16 "phantasics" (people with typical mental imagery). Participants read sentences describing visual scenes, physical actions, or abstract ideas. While they read, researchers used a technique called Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) to measure activity in the motor cortex—the part of the brain that controls body movement. This allowed them to see if the brain was "practicing" the movements it was reading about.

What They Found

In people who can visualize, reading about an action (like "turning a key") automatically triggered activity in the brain's movement center. However, for those with aphantasia, this "motor simulation" did not happen; their motor cortex remained quiet. Additionally, the aphantasic group reported almost no mental imagery while reading and scored lower on tests that required a deep, contextual understanding of the text, even though they were perfectly fine at remembering basic facts.

What This Might Mean

This suggests that aphantasia may be more than just a lack of "mental pictures." It might involve a broader "simulation" deficit where the brain doesn't internally mimic movements or sensations to help process information. This internal simulation appears to be a tool the brain uses to enrich the meaning of what we read. Because this was a small study, more research is needed to understand if these differences in reading comprehension affect aphantasic people in their daily lives or if they simply use different strategies to understand stories.

One Interesting Detail

While the group that could visualize showed a nearly 30% increase in brain activity related to movement while reading action sentences, the aphantasic group showed an increase of only about 3%, suggesting their brains process action words very differently.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain errors. Always refer to the original paper for accuracy.
Most-Cited Researchers
Top 10 researchers by number of papers published in Aphantasia
1

Joel Pearson

35
2

Merlin Monzel

30
3

Adam Zeman

20
4

Rebecca Keogh

17
5

Martin Reuter

16
6

Juha Silvanto

14
7

Paolo Bartolomeo

11
8

Carla Dance

10
9

Jianghao Liu

9
10

Fraser Milton

9
Recruit the largest aphantasia cohort on earth

97.4K+ users & subscribers across the imagery spectrum, plus 1.5M+ survey responses in our dataset. Skip the recruitment bottleneck and run your study with the community we've built for a decade.

Partner with us