Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Ask AI About This Paper
Ask AI About This Paper

The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness, Version 2 (MAIA-2)

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208034
Tags:
Measurement & Assessment
Mehling, W. E., Acree, M., Stewart, A., Silas, J., & Jones, A. (2018). The multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness, version 2 (maia-2). PLOS ONE, 13(12), e0208034. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0208034

Abstract

Interoception, the process by which the nervous system senses, interprets, and integrates signals originating from within the body, has become major research topic for mental health and in particular for mind-body interventions. Interoceptive awareness here is defined as the conscious level of interoception with its multiple dimensions potentially accessible to self-report. The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA) is an 8-scale state-trait questionnaire with 32 items to measure multiple dimensions of interoception by self-report and was published in November 2012. Its numerous applications in English and other languages revealed low internal consistency reliability for two of its scales. This study's objective was to improve these scales and the psychometrics of the MAIA by adding three new items to each of the two scales and evaluate these in a new sample. Data were collected within a larger project that took place as part of the Live Science residency programme at the Science Museum London, UK, where visitors to the museum (N = 1,090) completed the MAIA and the six additional items. Based on exploratory factor analysis in one-half of the adult participants and Cronbach alphas, we discarded one and included five of the six additional items into a Version 2 of the MAIA and conducted confirmatory factor analysis in the other half of the participants. The 8-factor model of the resulting 37-item MAIA-2 was confirmed with appropriate fit indices (RMSEA = 0.055 [95% CI 0.052-0.058]; SRMR = 0.064) and improved internal consistency reliability. The MAIA-2 is public domain and available (www.osher.ucsf.edu/maia) for interoception research and the evaluation of clinical mind-body interventions.

Authors

  • Wolf E. Mehling1
  • Michael Acree1
  • Anita Stewart1
  • Jonathan Silas1
  • Alexander Jones1

The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness, Version 2 (MAIA-2)

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208034
Tags:
Measurement & Assessment
Mehling, W. E., Acree, M., Stewart, A., Silas, J., & Jones, A. (2018). The multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness, version 2 (maia-2). PLOS ONE, 13(12), e0208034. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0208034

Abstract

Interoception, the process by which the nervous system senses, interprets, and integrates signals originating from within the body, has become major research topic for mental health and in particular for mind-body interventions. Interoceptive awareness here is defined as the conscious level of interoception with its multiple dimensions potentially accessible to self-report. The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA) is an 8-scale state-trait questionnaire with 32 items to measure multiple dimensions of interoception by self-report and was published in November 2012. Its numerous applications in English and other languages revealed low internal consistency reliability for two of its scales. This study's objective was to improve these scales and the psychometrics of the MAIA by adding three new items to each of the two scales and evaluate these in a new sample. Data were collected within a larger project that took place as part of the Live Science residency programme at the Science Museum London, UK, where visitors to the museum (N = 1,090) completed the MAIA and the six additional items. Based on exploratory factor analysis in one-half of the adult participants and Cronbach alphas, we discarded one and included five of the six additional items into a Version 2 of the MAIA and conducted confirmatory factor analysis in the other half of the participants. The 8-factor model of the resulting 37-item MAIA-2 was confirmed with appropriate fit indices (RMSEA = 0.055 [95% CI 0.052-0.058]; SRMR = 0.064) and improved internal consistency reliability. The MAIA-2 is public domain and available (www.osher.ucsf.edu/maia) for interoception research and the evaluation of clinical mind-body interventions.

Authors

  • Wolf E. Mehling1
  • Michael Acree1
  • Anita Stewart1
  • Jonathan Silas1
  • Alexander Jones1
Aphantasia Logo

What This Study Is About

This research focuses on improving how we measure "interoception"—the ability to sense and understand what is happening inside our own bodies, such as our heartbeat, breathing, or feelings of hunger and pain. The researchers wanted to update a popular questionnaire to ensure it accurately captures how different people experience these internal signals.

How They Studied It

The researchers collected data from 1,090 visitors at the Science Museum in London. These participants, ranging in age from 18 to 69, completed an updated version of a survey called the MAIA (Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness). The team added new questions to specific sections that had been confusing in the past, then used statistical tests to see if the new version provided more consistent and reliable results.

What They Found

The study successfully created an improved version of the tool, now called the MAIA-2. This version is better at measuring eight distinct aspects of body awareness, including how much a person trusts their bodily sensations and whether they tend to ignore or worry about physical discomfort. The researchers found that by adding just a few targeted questions, they could significantly improve the reliability of the "Non-Distracting" and "Not-Worrying" categories, which had been difficult to measure in previous versions.

What This Might Mean

Having a reliable way to measure internal body awareness is a crucial step for mind-body research. For those interested in aphantasia—the inability to create mental images—this tool allows researchers to investigate whether a lack of "mind's eye" imagery is linked to how people perceive their "inner world" of physical sensations. While this study proves the survey is a solid tool, it relies on self-reporting, meaning it measures how people think they perceive their bodies rather than their actual physical accuracy at tasks like heart-rate detection.

One Interesting Detail

The researchers found that "Not-Worrying" (the ability to stay calm when feeling pain or discomfort) is one of the most complex traits to measure because people’s emotional reactions to their bodies are highly personal and vary wildly from person to person.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain errors. Always refer to the original paper for accuracy.
Most-Cited Researchers
Top 10 researchers by number of papers published in Aphantasia
1

Joel Pearson

35
2

Merlin Monzel

30
3

Adam Zeman

20
4

Rebecca Keogh

17
5

Martin Reuter

16
6

Juha Silvanto

14
7

Paolo Bartolomeo

11
8

Carla Dance

10
9

Jianghao Liu

9
10

Fraser Milton

9
Recruit the largest aphantasia cohort on earth

97.4K+ users & subscribers across the imagery spectrum, plus 1.5M+ survey responses in our dataset. Skip the recruitment bottleneck and run your study with the community we've built for a decade.

Partner with us