Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Diversity of aphantasia revealed by multiple assessments of visual imagery, multisensory imagery, and cognitive style

Takahashi, J., Saito, G., Omura, K., Yasunaga, D., Sugimura, S., Sakamoto, S., Horikawa, T., & Gyoba, J. (2023). Diversity of aphantasia revealed by multiple assessments of visual imagery, multisensory imagery, and cognitive style. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1174873

Abstract

Aphantasia—a condition wherein individuals have a reduced or absent construction of voluntary visual imagery—is diagnosed using either the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire (VVIQ) or self-identification. However, a significant discrepancy exists between the proportions of aphantasia in the populations assessed using these two criteria. It is unclear why the reported proportions differ excessively and what percentage of people cannot form visual imagery. We investigated the replicability of the proportion of people with aphantasia using both criteria in the same population of participants. Therefore, we explored the potential causes of the discrepancy and characteristics of putative aphantasia in terms of multisensory imagery, cognitive style, and face recognition ability. First, we conducted an online sampling study (Study 1: N = 2,871) using the VVIQ, self-identification of a reduction in visual imagery, Questionnaire upon Mental Imagery (QMI), and Verbalizer-Visualizer Questionnaire (VVQ). We found that 3.7 and 12.1% fulfilled the VVIQ and self-identification criteria, respectively, roughly replicating the proportions reported in previous studies. The self-identification criterion—but not the VVIQ criterion—contains items related to face recognition; hence, we suspected that face recognition ability was factor contributing to this discrepancy and conducted another online sampling study (Study 2: N = 774). We found a significant correlation between VVIQ and face recognition ability in the control group with self-identification, but not in the group defined by low VVIQ (VVIQ ≤32). As the participants in the control group with self-identification tended to exhibit moderately high VVIQ scores but low face recognition ability, we reason that the discrepancy can be partially explained by the contamination of individual differences in face recognition ability. Additional analyses of Study 1 revealed that the aphantasia group included participants who lacked all types of sensory imagery or only visual imagery in multisensory imagery and exhibited a non-specific cognitive style. This study indicates that the VVIQ alone may be insufficient to diagnose individuals who report an inability to form visual imagery. Furthermore, we highlight the importance of multiple assessments—along with the VVIQ—to better understand the diversity of imagery in aphantasia.

Authors

  • Junichi Takahashi3
  • Godai Saito2
  • Kazufumi Omura3
  • Daichi Yasunaga2
  • Shinichiro Sugimura3
  • Shuichi Sakamoto2
  • Tomoyasu Horikawa3
  • Jiro Gyoba2

What This Study Is About

Researchers wanted to know why different tests for aphantasia often give totally different results. They also looked into whether aphantasia is just about "blindness" in the mind's eye or if it affects other senses, like sound and smell.

How They Studied It

The team surveyed nearly 3,000 people in Japan. Participants took several tests, including the VVIQ (the "gold standard" test for mental imagery—the ability to picture things in your mind). They also answered questions about whether they *felt* they had aphantasia and took tests measuring their ability to imagine sounds, smells, and even how well they recognize faces.

What They Found

The researchers discovered a massive "identity gap." While only 3.7% of people scored low enough on the official VVIQ test to be classified as having aphantasia, over 12% of people *self-identified* as having it.
Why the big difference? The study found that many people who struggle to recognize faces (a condition called prosopagnosia) often feel like they have aphantasia, even if they can still "see" other things in their mind. They also found that aphantasia isn't the same for everyone:
  • The "Total" Group: Some people couldn't imagine *any* senses (no mental pictures, sounds, or smells).
  • The "Visual-Only" Group: Others only lacked mental pictures but could still "hear" music or "smell" a rose in their heads.

What This Might Mean

This suggests that aphantasia is much more diverse than a simple "yes or no" condition. It’s more like a unique sensory fingerprint. It also shows that the way we currently diagnose aphantasia might be too narrow. However, since this study relied on people describing their own experiences (self-reporting), we have to be careful—people aren't always perfect at describing the "inside" of their heads!

One Interesting Detail

The researchers found that for some people, aphantasia is a "package deal"—if they couldn't picture a friend's face, they were also much more likely to say they couldn't imagine the sound of that friend's voice or the feeling of a breeze on their skin.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain errors. Always refer to the original paper for accuracy.