Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Ask AI About This Paper

Neuroradiological Insights into Visual Mental Imagery: Structural and Functional Imaging of Ventral and Dorsal Streams

DOI: 10.3390/brainsci16040345
Redžepi, S., Avdagić, E., Šahinović, A., & Pojskić, M. (2026). Neuroradiological insights into visual mental imagery: structural and functional imaging of ventral and dorsal streams. Brain Sciences, 16(4), 345. doi:10.3390/brainsci16040345

Abstract

Visual mental imagery, the ability to generate and manipulate internal visual experiences without direct sensory input, links perception with memory, planning, and higher cognition. In this targeted narrative review, we synthesize neuroimaging and lesion evidence on the brain basis of visual imagery, with a focus on neuroradiological correlates of the ventral and dorsal visual pathways. Unlike prior cognitive neuroscience reviews that primarily emphasize functional mechanisms, this review is neuroradiology-oriented and integrates lesion patterns and white-matter disconnection to support clinico-radiological interpretation of imagery complaints. Using a dual-stream framework, we contrast ventral occipito-temporal systems that preferentially support object imagery (appearance-based features such as form, faces/objects, and color, with texture remaining under-studied) with dorsal occipito-parietal systems that preferentially support spatial imagery (relations, transformations, and navigation). Across studies, imagery recruitment is strongly task- and stage-dependent: ventral regions are most often engaged during object-focused imagery, whereas parietal regions are prominent during spatial transformation tasks, with evidence for interaction between pathways when demands require both content and spatial operations. Structural and clinico-radiological findings indicate that imagery impairment can arise from focal posterior lesions and posterior neurodegenerative syndromes but also from network disruption affecting long-range connections that support top-down access to posterior representations. Finally, emerging work on aphantasia and hyperphantasia supports a network-level view in which imagery vividness relates to how effectively higher-order systems engage visual representations. We conclude that standardized, stream-sensitive tasks and multimodal approaches combining functional and structural imaging with lesion-based evidence are key to discovering clinically actionable biomarkers of imagery dysfunction.

Authors

  • Saleha Redžepi1
  • Edin Avdagić1
  • Ajša Šahinović1
  • Mirza Pojskić1
Ask AI About This Paper

Neuroradiological Insights into Visual Mental Imagery: Structural and Functional Imaging of Ventral and Dorsal Streams

DOI: 10.3390/brainsci16040345
Redžepi, S., Avdagić, E., Šahinović, A., & Pojskić, M. (2026). Neuroradiological insights into visual mental imagery: structural and functional imaging of ventral and dorsal streams. Brain Sciences, 16(4), 345. doi:10.3390/brainsci16040345

Abstract

Visual mental imagery, the ability to generate and manipulate internal visual experiences without direct sensory input, links perception with memory, planning, and higher cognition. In this targeted narrative review, we synthesize neuroimaging and lesion evidence on the brain basis of visual imagery, with a focus on neuroradiological correlates of the ventral and dorsal visual pathways. Unlike prior cognitive neuroscience reviews that primarily emphasize functional mechanisms, this review is neuroradiology-oriented and integrates lesion patterns and white-matter disconnection to support clinico-radiological interpretation of imagery complaints. Using a dual-stream framework, we contrast ventral occipito-temporal systems that preferentially support object imagery (appearance-based features such as form, faces/objects, and color, with texture remaining under-studied) with dorsal occipito-parietal systems that preferentially support spatial imagery (relations, transformations, and navigation). Across studies, imagery recruitment is strongly task- and stage-dependent: ventral regions are most often engaged during object-focused imagery, whereas parietal regions are prominent during spatial transformation tasks, with evidence for interaction between pathways when demands require both content and spatial operations. Structural and clinico-radiological findings indicate that imagery impairment can arise from focal posterior lesions and posterior neurodegenerative syndromes but also from network disruption affecting long-range connections that support top-down access to posterior representations. Finally, emerging work on aphantasia and hyperphantasia supports a network-level view in which imagery vividness relates to how effectively higher-order systems engage visual representations. We conclude that standardized, stream-sensitive tasks and multimodal approaches combining functional and structural imaging with lesion-based evidence are key to discovering clinically actionable biomarkers of imagery dysfunction.

Authors

  • Saleha Redžepi1
  • Edin Avdagić1
  • Ajša Šahinović1
  • Mirza Pojskić1
Most-Cited Researchers
Top 10 researchers by number of papers published in Aphantasia
1

Joel Pearson

33
2

Merlin Monzel

31
3

Adam Zeman

20
4

Rebecca Keogh

17
5

Martin Reuter

16
6

Juha Silvanto

14
7

Paolo Bartolomeo

11
8

Carla Dance

10
9

Jianghao Liu

10
10

Fraser Milton

9
Recruit from the largest aphantasia cohort on earth

94.6K+ users & subscribers across the imagery spectrum, plus 1.5M+ survey responsesin our dataset. Skip the recruitment bottleneck and run your study with the community we've built for a decade.

Partner with us
Aphantasia Logo

What This Study Is About

This research explores how the brain creates mental images and why some people lose this ability after a brain injury or medical condition. It looks at the "wiring" of the brain to understand how different regions work together to produce the pictures we see in our mind's eye.

How They Studied It

This was a comprehensive review of existing scientific literature rather than a single experiment. The researchers synthesized decades of data from brain scans (like fMRI), studies of patients with brain lesions (damaged areas), and clinical reports. They specifically focused on how the brain is organized into two main pathways: one for identifying "what" an object looks like (its color and shape) and another for "where" it is located or how it moves in space.

What They Found

The researchers found that mental imagery—the ability to picture things in your mind—depends on a complex network rather than just one "imagery center." They discovered that:
  • Ventral Stream: This pathway handles the "what." Damage here can make it impossible to visualize the color or shape of a sunset.
  • Dorsal Stream: This pathway handles the "where." Damage here might leave a person able to describe an object's appearance but unable to mentally rotate it or imagine its location.
  • Disconnection: Sometimes, the brain's "picture-making" areas are healthy, but the "cables" (white matter tracts) connecting them to the front of the brain are damaged. This "disconnection" can cause aphantasia even if the visual areas of the brain look normal on a standard scan.

What This Might Mean

This suggests that aphantasia (the absence of a mind's eye) can happen for different reasons. For some, it might be a problem with the brain's "storage" of visual memories; for others, it might be a "communication" failure between brain regions. This helps doctors better understand why a patient might lose their mental imagery after a stroke or injury, even if their actual eyesight remains perfect.

One Interesting Detail

The study highlights that "spatial imagery" (knowing where things are in your mind) and "object imagery" (seeing the details of those things) are so distinct that a person can lose one while keeping the other perfectly intact.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain errors. Always refer to the original paper for accuracy.