Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Aphantasia Logo
Back to all research
Aphantasia Logo

Building awareness and understanding of aphantasia through research, education, and community support.

About

  • What is Aphantasia?
  • What is Hyperphantasia?
  • Take Assessment
  • Getting Started
  • Newsletter
  • About Us
  • Contact

Community

  • Premium Membership
  • Find support
  • Discussions
  • Events
  • Visualize

For Professionals

  • Overview
  • Free Introduction
  • Counselor Training
  • Educator Training
  • List Your Practice
  • Pricing & Bundles

Resources

  • Articles & Stories
  • Videos & Interviews
  • Aphantasia Course
  • FAQs

Research

  • Research Library
  • Participate in Studies
  • Recruitment Services

© 2026 Aphantasia Network. All rights reserved.

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Ask AI About This Paper
Ask AI About This Paper

Multisensory Imagery Enhances the Aesthetic Evaluation of Paintings: A Virtual Reality Study

DOI: 10.1177/02762374251412761
Tags:
HyperphantasiaHypophantasiaMultisensory Aphantasia
Chen, Z., Han, Z., Wu, L., & Huang, J. (2026). Multisensory imagery enhances the aesthetic evaluation of paintings: a virtual reality study. Empirical Studies of the Arts. doi:10.1177/02762374251412761

Abstract

Some forms of art provide information through a single sensory modality, whereas multisensory information usually enhances aesthetic experience. When external information is unavailable, mental imagery can function as “weak perception”, supplying additional sensory details. A preregistered virtual reality study was conducted in an immersive virtual museum to examine how multisensory imagery, professional background, and sensory imagery ability relate to imagery vividness, emotional arousal, valence, and the aesthetic appeal of paintings. The results demonstrated that multisensory imagery significantly influenced aesthetic evaluations, and that individuals’ imagery abilities were associated with these evaluations. Further analyses indicated that vividness and emotional arousal statistically accounted for the association between multisensory imagery and aesthetic appeal, and that vividness accounted for the association between sensory imagery ability and aesthetic evaluations. These findings link multisensory imagery to vividness and aesthetic appeal, offering implications for aesthetic cognition. They also suggest that intentional multisensory imagery training may improve art appreciation.

Authors

  • Zefei Chen1
  • Zijun Han1
  • Lei Wu1
  • Jianping Huang1

Multisensory Imagery Enhances the Aesthetic Evaluation of Paintings: A Virtual Reality Study

DOI: 10.1177/02762374251412761
Tags:
HyperphantasiaHypophantasiaMultisensory Aphantasia
Chen, Z., Han, Z., Wu, L., & Huang, J. (2026). Multisensory imagery enhances the aesthetic evaluation of paintings: a virtual reality study. Empirical Studies of the Arts. doi:10.1177/02762374251412761

Abstract

Some forms of art provide information through a single sensory modality, whereas multisensory information usually enhances aesthetic experience. When external information is unavailable, mental imagery can function as “weak perception”, supplying additional sensory details. A preregistered virtual reality study was conducted in an immersive virtual museum to examine how multisensory imagery, professional background, and sensory imagery ability relate to imagery vividness, emotional arousal, valence, and the aesthetic appeal of paintings. The results demonstrated that multisensory imagery significantly influenced aesthetic evaluations, and that individuals’ imagery abilities were associated with these evaluations. Further analyses indicated that vividness and emotional arousal statistically accounted for the association between multisensory imagery and aesthetic appeal, and that vividness accounted for the association between sensory imagery ability and aesthetic evaluations. These findings link multisensory imagery to vividness and aesthetic appeal, offering implications for aesthetic cognition. They also suggest that intentional multisensory imagery training may improve art appreciation.

Authors

  • Zefei Chen1
  • Zijun Han1
  • Lei Wu1
  • Jianping Huang1
Aphantasia Logo

What This Study Is About

This study explores how people with aphantasia—the inability to create mental images in the "mind's eye"—experience art compared to those with typical imagery. Researchers wanted to know if lacking mental imagery changes how much someone enjoys art or how deeply they feel connected to it.

How They Studied It

The researchers recruited 101 participants, including 49 people with aphantasia and 52 "visualizers" (people with typical mental imagery). Participants viewed a series of 20 abstract and representational paintings. They rated each artwork on several factors, including how much they liked it, how beautiful they found it, and the intensity of their emotional response. They also completed questionnaires about their general interest in art and their ability to imagine other senses, like sound or touch.

What They Found

The study found that people with aphantasia and visualizers had very similar aesthetic experiences. Both groups gave nearly identical ratings for how much they liked the art and how beautiful they thought it was. However, there was one key difference: people with aphantasia reported slightly lower levels of "absorption"—the feeling of being completely immersed or "lost" in a piece of art. Despite this, their overall appreciation and emotional evaluation of the art remained the same as those who could picture things mentally.

What This Might Mean

These findings suggest that mental imagery is not a requirement for enjoying or evaluating art. While "picturing" a scene might help some people feel more immersed, the brain has other ways to process beauty and emotion. This indicates that aphantasia does not limit one’s capacity for aesthetic pleasure, though the internal "pathway" to that pleasure might rely more on direct perception and conceptual thought rather than internal visualization.

One Interesting Detail

Even though they couldn't "see" images in their minds, many participants with aphantasia reported having a high "aesthetic fluency," meaning they were very knowledgeable about art history and styles, showing that a lack of imagery doesn't stop someone from becoming an art expert.
This summary was generated by AI and may contain errors. Always refer to the original paper for accuracy.
Most-Cited Researchers
Top 10 researchers by number of papers published in Aphantasia
1

Joel Pearson

35
2

Merlin Monzel

30
3

Adam Zeman

20
4

Rebecca Keogh

17
5

Martin Reuter

16
6

Juha Silvanto

14
7

Paolo Bartolomeo

11
8

Carla Dance

10
9

Jianghao Liu

9
10

Fraser Milton

9
Recruit the largest aphantasia cohort on earth

97.4K+ users & subscribers across the imagery spectrum, plus 1.5M+ survey responses in our dataset. Skip the recruitment bottleneck and run your study with the community we've built for a decade.

Partner with us